Use what you can: storage, abstraction processes, and perceptual adjustments help listeners recognize reduced forms.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Three eye-tracking experiments tested whether native listeners recognized reduced Dutch words better after having heard the same reduced words, or different reduced words of the same reduction type and whether familiarization with one reduction type helps listeners to deal with another reduction type. In the exposure phase, a segmental reduction group was exposed to /b/-reductions (e.g., minderij instead of binderij, "book binder") and a syllabic reduction group was exposed to full-vowel deletions (e.g., p'raat instead of paraat, "ready"), while a control group did not hear any reductions. In the test phase, all three groups heard the same speaker producing reduced-/b/ and deleted-vowel words that were either repeated (Experiments 1 and 2) or new (Experiment 3), but that now appeared as ta
SUBMITTER: Poellmann K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4038950 | biostudies-literature | 2014
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA