Two methods provide similar signals for the need to update systematic reviews.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Apply and compare two methods that identify signals for the need to update systematic reviews, using three Evidence-based Practice Center reports on omega-3 fatty acids as test cases.

Study design and setting

We applied the RAND method, which uses domain (subject matter) expert guidance, and a modified Ottawa method, which uses quantitative and qualitative signals. For both methods, we conducted focused electronic literature searches of recent studies using the key terms from the original reports. We assessed the agreement between the methods and qualitatively assessed the merits of each system.

Results

Agreement between the two methods was "substantial" or better (kappa>0.62) in three of the four systematic reviews. Overall agreement between the methods was

SUBMITTER: Chung M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4141462 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature