Dataset Information

A phase 2 study of belinostat (PXD101) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia or patients over the age of 60 with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a California Cancer Consortium Study.

ABSTRACT: We performed a phase II study of belinostat in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this open label phase II study (NCT00357032), patients with relapsed/refractory AML, or newly diagnosed patients with AML over the age of 60, were eligible. Belinostat was administered intravenously (IV) at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) daily on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate, with secondary endpoints of overall response rate (CR + partial response [PR]), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival and safety. Twelve eligible patients with AML were enrolled, of whom six had received at least one prior line of therapy. No CR or PR was seen. Four patients had stable disease for at least five cycles. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicities occurred in four patients. Belinostat as monotherapy has minimal single-agent effect in AML on this dosing schedule.

SUBMITTER: Kirschbaum MH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4143479 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A phase 2 study of belinostat (PXD101) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia or patients over the age of 60 with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a California Cancer Consortium Study.

Kirschbaum Mark H MH Foon Kenneth A KA Frankel Paul P Ruel Christopher C Pulone Bernadette B Tuscano Joseph M JM Newman Edward M EM

Leukemia & lymphoma 20140224 10

We performed a phase II study of belinostat in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this open label phase II study (NCT00357032), patients with relapsed/refractory AML, or newly diagnosed patients with AML over the age of 60, were eligible. Belinostat was administered intravenously (IV) at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) daily on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate, with secondary endpoints of overall respon ...[more]

PMID: 24369094

Similar Datasets

Project description:Opinion statementRelapse is still a common scenario in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment and occurs in 40-50% of younger and the great majority of elderly patients. The prognosis in relapsed AML patients is generally poor but depends largely on the timing of relapse (early versus late) and the possibility of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). At the time of relapse, we again perform a mutational screening and cytogenetic analysis in all AML patients as clonal evolution of disease is frequent. Clinical trials should be first priority in all relapsed patients. In fit patients without prior transplant, we aim to perform HSCT after salvage therapy. In AML patients relapsing after HSCT and good performance status, intensive therapy can be considered with subsequent cellular therapy such as donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) or a second HSCT. However, less than 20% of these patients are alive after 5 years. For those patients that are unfit, the therapeutic aim is to prolong life with acceptable quality of life. Here, hypomethylating agents (HMA), low-dose AraC (LDAC), and solely cytoreductive therapy with hydroxurea are options depending on first-line therapy. For those patients that have not been treated with venetoclax in first line, the combination therapy of venetoclax with demethylating agents achieves encouraging response rates. Venetoclax is currently also studied in combination with intensive salvage therapy. Importantly, for patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2-mutated AML, ivosidenib, an IDH1 inhibitor, and enasidenib, an IDH2 inhibitor, present well-tolerated options in the setting of refractory or relapsed (r/r) disease even in elderly and heavily pre-treated patients with response rates of 30-40%. Both substances have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for r/r AML patients with IDH1/2 mutations (but not yet by the European Medicines Agency (EMA)). For patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations, treatment with the selective FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib is well tolerated and leads to improved outcome compared with standard salvage therapy. The approval has been granted by the FDA and the EMA. Generally, we would recommend targeted therapy for IDH1/2- and FLT3-mutated AML if available. In order to improve outcome in relapsed AML, it will be important to intelligently combine novel substances with each other as well as chemotherapy in prospective clinical trials. The development of therapies with bispecific antibodies or chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) are still in early development.

Dataset Information

A phase 2 study of belinostat (PXD101) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia or patients over the age of 60 with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a California Cancer Consortium Study.

Publications

A phase 2 study of belinostat (PXD101) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia or patients over the age of 60 with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a California Cancer Consortium Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets