Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Primary perineal wound closure after conventional abdominoperineal resection (cAPR) for rectal cancer has been the standard of care for many years. Since the introduction of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and the extralevator APR (eAPR), oncological outcome has been improved, but at the cost of increased rates of perineal wound healing problems and perineal hernia. This has progressively increased the use of biological meshes, although not supported by sufficient evidence. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of pelvic floor reconstruction using a biological mesh after standardized eAPR with neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure.Methods/design
In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, patients with a clin
SUBMITTER: Musters GD
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4158342 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature