Endoscopic lateral orbitotomy.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Lateral orbitotomy can be minimalized using contemporary endoscopy.Methods
Anatomy of the temporal fossa/orbital wall junction is described. The attachment of the temporal fascia is cut off from the orbital rim through a 1.5 cm skin incision in the lateral orbital wrinkle. The temporal muscle is detached from the bone to create a space for the telescope. An appropriate bone opening in the lateral orbital wall is created with the aid of neuronavigation to handle intraorbital pathology.Conclusion
Endoscopic lateral orbitotomy is an original alternative to the microsurgical Krönlein approach and yields good functional and cosmetic results.
SUBMITTER: Lyson T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4166432 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Endoscopic lateral orbitotomy.
Lyson Tomasz T Sieskiewicz Andrzej A Rogowski Marek M Mariak Zenon Z
Acta neurochirurgica 20140827 10
<h4>Background</h4>Lateral orbitotomy can be minimalized using contemporary endoscopy.<h4>Methods</h4>Anatomy of the temporal fossa/orbital wall junction is described. The attachment of the temporal fascia is cut off from the orbital rim through a 1.5 cm skin incision in the lateral orbital wrinkle. The temporal muscle is detached from the bone to create a space for the telescope. An appropriate bone opening in the lateral orbital wall is created with the aid of neuronavigation to handle intraor ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Many surgical methods are available for hallux valgus, but consensus regarding the best management has yet to be established. Minimally invasive techniques are gaining popularity with the potential advantages of better cosmetic outcome, less postoperative pain, and decreasing recovery time because surgical exposure and deep soft tissue dissection are less extensive and possibly gentler. Recently, techniques of the endoscopic distal soft tissue procedure have been reported, in which an endoscopic approach of the classic distal soft tissue procedure is described. The intermetatarsal ligament, adductor hallucis insertion, and the lateral capsuloligamentous complex of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is released during the endoscopic lateral release. However, the intermetatarsal ligament does not contribute to development of the hallux valgus deformity, and release of the ligament is not necessary for correction of the deformity. Instead, preservation of the intermetatarsal ligament may protect the interdigital nerve and reduce the risk of nerve injury during endoscopic lateral release. In this technical note, the technical details of supraligamentous approach of lateral release in endoscopic lateral soft tissue procedure (or EDSTP) is described. This approach can help to reduce the risk of injury to the interdigital nerve during endoscopic lateral release.
| S-EPMC9134000 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Posterior ankle pain is a common foot and ankle problem faced by orthopaedic surgeons. It can have many causes, including posterior ankle joint pathologies (synovitis or osteochondral lesion), ankle impingement (posterior, posterolateral, or posteromedial), flexor hallucis longus pathologies, peroneal tendon problems, posterior tibial tendinopathy, Achilles tendon pathology, posterior subtalar tarsal coalition, or tarsal tunnel syndrome. Most of these pathologies can be managed effectively by an endoscopic approach. The classic endoscopic approach is the 2-portal posterior ankle endoscopy with the portals at the medial and lateral side of the Achilles tendon. This is performed with the patient in prone position. In this technical note, we describe the details of endoscopic approach to the posterior ankle via lateral portals. This allow flexibility of patient positioning (supine, prone, or lateral). It is particularly effective for the management of posteromedial ankle impingement without the risk of injury to the posterior tibial neurovascular bundle. Moreover, any concomitant peroneal tendon pathology can be managed via the same lateral portals.
| S-EPMC7189622 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A ganglion is the most common soft-tissue mass in the foot and can cause pain, paresthesia, or footwear problems. A ganglion can extend from the dorsum into the plantar compartment of the foot in the form of a horseshoe at the borders of the foot or in the form of an hourglass through the intermetatarsal space. Initial conservative management of a ganglion may entail observation and the use of padding for comfort, manual rupture, aspiration of the cyst contents, and steroid injection or sclerotherapy into the cyst. When the lesion is recurrent or painful, surgical excision is recommended. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe the details of endoscopic resection of a horseshoe ganglion of the lateral midfoot. This technique has the advantages of being minimally invasive, with better cosmetic results and less surgical trauma to the soft tissue.
| S-EPMC11369950 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Synovial cysts on the lateral side of the knee can cause pain, limitation of joint mobility, compression of the neighboring neurovascular structures, rupture leading to compartment syndrome, infection, erosion of adjacent bone, and iliotibial band friction syndrome. Open resection is commonly performed for symptomatic cysts. We describe an alternative, endoscopic approach to cyst resection. This has the advantages of minimally invasive surgery of smaller wounds, better cosmesis, and less surgical trauma.
| S-EPMC4886518 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Bursal chondromatosis is synovial chondromatosis of the bursae. It is a rare disease entity that can involve the adventitial bursa of the lateral ankle. Complete synovectomy, removal of loose bodies, and bursectomy comprise the treatment of choice. Detailed preoperative radiologic assessment and surgical planning are the keys to success. Any accompanying synovial chondromatosis of the ankle or subtalar joint or tenosynovial chondromatosis of the peroneal tendon sheath should be treated together with the bursectomy. Endoscopic bursectomy can be performed through the bursal portal. The proximal and distal peroneal tendoscopy portals serve as viewing portals. The resection of the diseased tissues should be performed in a step-by-step zonal manner. Complete synovectomy and removal of loose bodies should be performed before bursectomy. Internal drainage of the bursal sac into the peroneal tendon sheath may be indicated if the sac is adherent to the skin. It should only be performed after complete synovectomy and removal of loose bodies.
| S-EPMC5020423 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLeg pain and back pain after lumbar laminectomy and spinal decompression fusion surgery are common and often related to persistent lumbar foraminal or lateral recess stenosis. Although persistent symptoms often stem from incomplete decompression during the primary index surgery, recurrent symptoms may also be the result of intervertebral cage subsidence due to loss of intervertebral and neuroforaminal height.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using the outpatient transforaminal decompression procedure as an alternative to inpatient open procedure in revision decompression surgery, with the intent of minimizing the incidence of perioperative and postoperative surgical complications while reducing both direct and indirect costs of surgical treatment, shortening time to patient postoperative narcotic independence, and shortening time of patient return to daily activities.MethodsA total of 48 patients with conclusive diagnostic imaging and interventional workup underwent endoscopic transforaminal and lateral recess decompression for both persistent or recurrent leg and/or low back pain following previous lumbar laminectomy (22 patients) or decompression fusion surgery (26 patients). In addition to radiographic studies, patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively, and clinical outcomes were evaluated with the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified Macnab criteria.ResultsAt final follow-up, patients with single- and 2-level prior surgeries reported an average ODI reduction following their secondary surgery of 44.6%, with an average final score of 14.8. Less favorable ODI score reductions following secondary surgery (23.8%) were reported by patients who had more than one or a complex prior multilevel surgery. According to the modified Macnab criteria, "excellent" and "good" results were obtained with the secondary surgery in 79.1% (38 of 48) of patients with no more than a single 1- or 2-level prior lumbar surgery. The mean VAS score decreased from 7.7 ± 1.8 preoperatively to 2.3 ± 1.1 at final follow-up (P < .01). Fair and poor results with the secondary surgery were seen in 20.9% (10 of 48) of patients with several prior surgeries or complex multilevel previous lumbar surgeries. The level distribution for secondary surgery was as follows: L4-5 segment (26 levels; 54.1%), L5-S1 (14 levels; 29.2%), L3-4 (7 levels; 14.6%), and the L2-3 level (1 level; 2.1%). Postoperative complications were limited to irritation of the dorsal root ganglion, which occurred in 25% (12 of 48) of patients. There were no wound infections, nerve root injuries, foot drop, or admissions to a hospital for further postoperative care. All patients with "excellent" and "good" outcomes measured by modified Macnab criteria, who were working before and after the primary and secondary surgeries (27 of 38), reported earlier return to work after the endoscopic outpatient surgery (2.6 ± 0.8 weeks) than with the prior inpatient open spinal surgery (8.1 ± 4.5 weeks). Based on the 2012 Medicare fee schedule for professional fees, direct costs were 40.6% and indirect costs were 37.1% lower with the secondary endoscopic surgery compared with primary open surgery.ConclusionsTransforaminal decompression is an effective alternative to open revision lumbar spinal surgery to treat symptomatic spinal stenosis after previous lumbar surgery in patients with persistent or recurrent leg and low back pain. It can be safely done in an outpatient setting, while realizing savings in direct and indirect costs.
| S-EPMC6159347 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThe aims of the study were to investigate if feline middle ear anatomy can be visualized using endoscopy via a lateral bulla approach and to determine if scope-assistance increases rates of successful entry into the hypotympanum during feline total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy (TECA-LBO).MethodsA total of 13 feline cadaver heads underwent CT to confirm the absence of pre-existing middle ear disease. For each head, an electronic coin toss was used to determine which ear would undergo endoscope-assisted TECA-LBO; a traditional TECA-LBO without the use of the scope was performed on the contralateral side. In endoscope-assisted procedures, a 1.9 mm scope was intermittently inserted into the tympanic bulla via a lateral bulla approach and used to identify middle ear structures, visualize the bony septum and confirm entry into the hypotympanum. After the bilateral TECA-LBO, the cadaver heads were imaged again and assessed for evidence of entry through the septum.ResultsSoft tissue and osseus structures of the middle ear were readily visualized with a 1.9 mm scope. Success rates for entry into the hypotympanum were high between both endoscope-assisted and traditional procedures, with entry confirmed for 12/13 ears in each group.Conclusions and relevanceEndoscope assistance can facilitate the identification and examination of middle ear structures but does not appear to increase the success rate of entry into the hypotympanum during feline TECA-LBO, as entry through the bony septum was consistently accomplished even without scope-assisted visualization. Alternative benefits to scope assistance may exist, and future studies to elucidate its impact on rates of intraoperative trauma to middle ear structures are indicated.
| S-EPMC10812025 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe extra-cervical lateral route endoscopic thyroidectomy (LRET) approaches such as the trans-axillary, breast and axillo-breast approaches are proved to be safe, feasible, esthetic, highly effective. The inherent difficulty and long learning curve of these techniques prevents its widespread application.MethodsBenefiting from the experience of more than 5 years in LRET approaches with CO2 insufflation, the authors developed ten surgical key steps and a critical view of safety (CVS) for performing thyroid lobectomy via LRET approaches. A detailed description and a video of the surgical technique is provided.ResultsApplication of these structured key steps and CVS was feasible and effective in achieving thyroid lobectomy in all selected cases with unilateral goiter up to 8 cm, even in cases with thyroiditis or controlled toxic adenoma, without any adverse events and with shorter operative time than the non-structured surgical technique.ConclusionThe described ten key steps and CVS are conclusive, applicable, easy to learn. Our video could act as a guide for promoting the standardized, safe, and wide application of LRET techniques.
| S-EPMC10229712 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveLateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a highly useful lumbar fusion surgical technique for degenerative spinal disease. However, many complications have already been reported. The purpose of this study is to report the concept, surgical technique, and clinical results of the first 70 consecutive cases treated with a safer and minimally invasive endoscopic-assisted LLIF (ELLIF).MethodsThis retrospective study included 70 cases involving 106 segments in which ELLIF was used to treat degenerative spinal disease. We examined the clinical progress, complications and analyzed radiographic images. Regarding the fusion rate, 49 cases involving 72 segments whose follow-up period was more than 7 months were evaluated.ResultsThe mean of preoperative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was 7.0 and postoperative NRS was 1.4. Postoperative NRS had a significant correlation with the number of fusion segments (p = 0.028). The mean of preoperative disc space height, foraminal height, sagittal rotation angle, whole lumbar lordosis and sagittal translation distance were 3.3 mm, 14.3 mm, 2.4°, 9.7°, and 3.2 mm, respectively. Postoperative values were 9.4 mm, 17.9 mm, -4.9°, 36.3°, and 0.7 mm. The fusion rate was 79.2%. Complications included, transient psoas muscle weakness 1, sensory disturbance in the thigh 2, retroperitoneal injury 1, postoperative ileus possibly involving a retroperitoneal injury 1, and cage migration 4.ConclusionUsing the ELLIF in the degenerative spinal disease, we obtained good radiological reduction and good clinical results. Our study confirms that ELLIF is safer and provides better results for degenerative spinal disease. However, the issue of cage migration remains to be resolved.
| S-EPMC6449819 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background/aimEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is typically performed in prone position. In cases of difficulty in prone position, ERCP can be performed in left lateral position. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of left lateral position for ERCP compared with those of prone position.Patients and methodsBetween August 2015 and March 2016, a total of 62 patients with native papilla who underwent ERCP were randomly assigned to undergo the procedure in left lateral position (n = 31) or prone position (n = 31). The outcomes of procedures were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the demographic data, indications for ERCP, comorbidities, anticoagulation agents, the types and doses of sedative agents, and procedural durations. The rates of technical success and adverse events were similar (96.8 and 40%, respectively, in left lateral group and 100 and 32.3%, respectively, in prone group). The rates of unintentional pancreatic duct (PD) cannulation and the acquisition of pancreatograms in left lateral group were significantly greater than those in prone group (9/30, 30.0% vs. 3/31, 9.7%, P = 0.046; 7/30, 23.3% vs. 1/31, 3.2%, P = 0.020, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (6/30, 20% vs. 5/31, 16.1%, P = 0.694).ConclusionThe left lateral position for ERCP can be as effective and safe as prone position. Due to increased rates of unintended PD cannulation and contrast injection, the initial use of left lateral position may be limited to cases that exhibit difficulty in prone position.
| S-EPMC5625367 | biostudies-literature