Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To understand how often 'breakthroughs,' that is, treatments that significantly improve health outcomes, can be developed.Design
We applied weighted adaptive kernel density estimation to construct the probability density function for observed treatment effects from five publicly funded cohorts and one privately funded group.Data sources
820 trials involving 1064 comparisons and enrolling 331,004 patients were conducted by five publicly funded cooperative groups. 40 cancer trials involving 50 comparisons and enrolling a total of 19,889 patients were conducted by GlaxoSmithKline.Results
We calculated that the probability of detecting treatment with large effects is 10% (5-25%), and that the probability of detecting treatment with very large treatment effects is 2% (0.3-10%). Researchers themselves judged that they discovered a new, breakthrough intervention in 16% of trials.Conclusions
We propose these figures as the benchmarks against which future development of 'breakthrough' treatments should be measured.
SUBMITTER: Miladinovic B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4208055 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Miladinovic Branko B Kumar Ambuj A Mhaskar Rahul R Djulbegovic Benjamin B
BMJ open 20141021 10
<h4>Objective</h4>To understand how often 'breakthroughs,' that is, treatments that significantly improve health outcomes, can be developed.<h4>Design</h4>We applied weighted adaptive kernel density estimation to construct the probability density function for observed treatment effects from five publicly funded cohorts and one privately funded group.<h4>Data sources</h4>820 trials involving 1064 comparisons and enrolling 331,004 patients were conducted by five publicly funded cooperative groups. ...[more]