Handling missing data in RCTs; a review of the top medical journals.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Missing outcome data is a threat to the validity of treatment effect estimates in randomized controlled trials. We aimed to evaluate the extent, handling, and sensitivity analysis of missing data and intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in top tier medical journals, and compare our findings with previous reviews related to missing data and ITT in RCTs.

Methods

Review of RCTs published between July and December 2013 in the BMJ, JAMA, Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine, excluding cluster randomized trials and trials whose primary outcome was survival.

Results

Of the 77 identified eligible articles, 73 (95%) reported some missing outcome data. The median percentage of participants with a missing outcome was 9% (rang

SUBMITTER: Bell ML 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4247714 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature