Deprescribing for older patients.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Frank C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4259770 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Deprescribing for older patients.
Frank Christopher C Weir Erica E
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 20140902 18
Similar Datasets
Project description:Polypharmacy is an important issue in older patients affected by dementia because they are very vulnerable to the side effects of drugs'. Between October 2021 and September 2022, we randomly assessed 205 old-aged outpatients. The study was carried out in a Center for Dementia in collaboration with a university center. The primary outcomes were: (1) deprescribing inappropriate drugs through the Beers and STOPP&START criteria; (2) assessing duplicate drugs and the risk of iatrogenic damage due to drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. Overall, 69 men and 136 women (mean age 82.7 ± 7.4 years) were assessed. Of these, 91 patients were home care patients and 114 were outpatient. The average number of the drugs used in the sample was 9.4 drugs per patient; after the first visit and the consequent deprescribing process, the average dropped to 8.7 drugs per patient (p = 0.04). Overall, 74 potentially inappropriate drugs were used (36.1%). Of these, long half-life benzodiazepines (8.8%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (3.4%), tricyclic antidepressants (3.4%), first-generation antihistamines (1.4%), anticholinergics (11.7%), antiplatelet drugs (i.e., ticlopidine) (1.4%), prokinetics in chronic use (1.4%), digoxin (>0.125 mg/day) (1.4%), antiarrhythmics (i.e., amiodarone) (0.97%), and α-blockers (1.9%) were included. The so-called "duplicate" drugs were overall 26 (12.7%). In total, ten potentially dangerous prescriptions were found for possible interactions (4.8%). We underline the importance of checking all the drugs taken periodically and discontinuing drugs with the lowest benefit-to-harm ratio and the lowest probability of adverse reactions due to withdrawal. Computer tools and adequately trained teams (doctors, nurses, and pharmacists) could identify, treat, and prevent possible drug interactions.
| S-EPMC10961769 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We conduct a systematic review to investigate current deprescribing practices and evaluate outcomes and adverse events with deprescribing of preventive medications in older patients with either an end-of-life designation or residing in long-term care facilities with cardiometabolic conditions. Studies were identified using a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov.uk, CINAHLS, and the Cochrane Register from inception to March 2022. Studies reviewed included observational studies and randomised control trials (RCTs). Data was extracted on baseline characteristics, deprescribing rates, adverse events and outcomes, and quality of life indicators, and was discussed using a narrative approach. Thirteen studies were identified for inclusion. Deprescribing approaches included complete withdrawal, dose reduction or tapering, or switching to an alternative medication, for at least one preventive medication. Deprescribing success rates ranged from 27 to 94.7%. The studies reported no significant changes in laboratory values or adverse outcomes but did find mixed outcomes for hospitalisations and a slight increase in mortality rates when comparing the intervention and control groups. Lack of good-quality randomised control trials suggests that deprescribing in the older population residing in long-term care facilities with cardiometabolic conditions and multimorbidity is feasible when controlled and regularly monitored by an appropriate healthcare clinician, and that the benefits outweigh the potential harm in this cohort of patients. Due to the limited evidence and the heterogeneity of studies, a meta-analysis was not performed and as such further research is required to assess the benefits of deprescribing in this patient population. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021291061.
| S-EPMC10643631 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Deprescribing, an integral component of a continuum of good prescribing practices, is the process of medication withdrawal or dose reduction to correct or prevent medication-related complications, improve outcomes, and reduce costs. Deprescribing is particularly applicable to the commonly encountered multimorbid older adult with cardiovascular disease and concomitant geriatric conditions such as polypharmacy, frailty, and cognitive dysfunction-a combination rarely addressed in current clinical practice guidelines. Triggers to deprescribe include present or expected adverse drug reactions, unnecessary polypharmacy, and the need to align medications with goals of care when life expectancy is reduced. Using a framework to deprescribe, this review addresses the rationale, evidence, and strategies for deprescribing cardiovascular and some noncardiovascular medications.
| S-EPMC6724706 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOvertreatment with cardiometabolic medication in older patients can lead to major adverse events. Timely deprescribing of these medications is therefore essential. Self-reported willingness to stop medication is usually high among older people, still overtreatment with cardiometabolic medication is common and deprescribing is rarely initiated. An important barrier for deprescribing reported by general practitioners is the patients' unwillingness to stop the medication. More insights are needed into the influence of patients' characteristics on their attitudes towards deprescribing and differences in these attitudes between cardiometabolic medication groups.MethodsA survey in older people using cardiometabolic medication using the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire was performed. Participants completed the general rPATD and an adapted version for four medication groups. Linear and ordinal logistic regression were used to assess the influence of age, sex, therapeutic area and number of medications used on the patients' general attitudes towards deprescribing. Univariate analysis was used to compare differences in deprescribing attitudes towards sulfonylureas, insulins, antihypertensive medication and statins.ResultsOverall, 314 out of 1143 invited participants completed the survey (median age 76 years, 54% female). Most participants (80%) were satisfied with their medication and willing to stop medications if their doctor said it was possible (88%). Age, sex and therapeutic area had no influence on the general attitudes towards deprescribing. Taking more than ten medicines was significantly associated with a higher perceived medication burden. Antihypertensive medication and insulin were considered more appropriate than statins, and insulin was considered more appropriate than sulfonylureas not favouring deprescribing.ConclusionsThe majority of older people using cardiometabolic medication are willing to stop one of their medicines if their doctor said it was possible. Health care providers should take into account that patients perceive some of their medication as more appropriate than other medication when discussing deprescribing.
| S-EPMC8207766 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDeprescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can be considered in situations where the drug may no longer be necessary; however, this requires a careful discussion between patients and healthcare providers, often general practitioners (GPs). The aim of our study was to explore how GPs discuss PPI deprescribing with patients and compare that to how older patients would like to discuss this decision.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with GPs (n = 11) and patients aged ≥65 years who were taking PPIs (n = 4). Analysis of interviews was based on systematic text condensation.ResultsWe identified four main themes: (1) Reasons PPI deprescribing comes up, (2) Considering PPI deprescribing, (3) Discussion topics, and (4) Incorporating patient preferences into PPI deprescribing decisions. We found that PPI deprescribing often comes up during consultations for other problems or due to concern about medication burden in general. GPs discussed topics related to symptom control, such as the possibility of rebound symptoms, the need to taper PPIs, and what to do if symptoms returned. This aligned with what patients felt was important to discuss. Some GPs routinely incorporated patient preferences into decisions, whereas others did not.ConclusionWhen discussing PPI deprescribing, the GPs in our study generally focused on topics related to symptom control. There was variability in how and if patient preferences were discussed. Greater focus may be needed on developing mechanisms to elicit and incorporate patient preferences into PPI deprescribing decisions. Future research could also explore more systematic approaches to reassess ongoing PPI use in an effort to curb unnecessary long-term use of PPIs.
| S-EPMC7415175 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPsychoactive drugs represent a major contributor to falls in older people. This study aims to evaluate the prescribing practice of psychoactive drugs in older people hospitalized for hip fracture (HF) and to explore independent correlates of deprescribing.MethodsMulticenter prospective observational study including patients with HF admitted to 13 Orthogeriatric wards of the Italian Group of Orthogeriatrics (July 2019-August 2022). Patients underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment. The use of psychoactive drugs associated with a higher risk of falls was assessed using a dedicated checklist. Deprescribing was defined as any reduction in the number of psychoactive drugs upon discharge, and independent correlates of deprescribing were explored using logistic regression analyses. Cluster analysis by Partitioning around Medoids was also performed in the hypothesis that selected clusters of characteristics could be associated with deprescribing.ResultsOne thousand eight hundred fifty-four older individuals (mean age 84 years, 77% females) were studied; 1190 (64%) were not prescribed any psychoactive drug, while 474 (26%), 129 (7%), and 61 (3%) took 1, 2, 3 or more psychoactive drugs, respectively. Among 664 patients on psychoactive drugs on admission, 177 (27%) had fewer prescriptions at discharge, mainly anxiolytics from 89 to 10 (50-6%), antipsychotics from 49 to 12 (28-7%) and antidepressants from 98 to 28 (55-16%). On the other count, 51 (8%) were prescribed more psychoactive drugs, mostly antidepressants from 25 to 45 (49-88%) and antipsychotics from 7 to 17 (14-17%). Functional autonomy (ADL aOR 0.87 [95%CI 0.78-0.97] p < 0.001), polipharmacy (aOR 1.15 [95%CI 1.03-1.29] p < 0.001) and the occurrence of post-operative delirium (aOR 1.71 [95%CI 1.09-2.66] p < 0.017) were independent correlates of deprescribing. More specifically, the clustering procedure could not improve the characterization of deprescribing; conversely, the deprescribing propensity significantly depended upon the center-specific prescriptive practice, not explained by other clinical-epidemiological factors.ConclusionOnly a small proportion of patients hospitalized for HF undergoes deprescribing of psychoactive drugs, with considerable heterogeneity among centers, suggesting that the physician's attitude rather than patient-related factors affects deprescribing.
| S-EPMC11871694 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Polypharmacy, commonly defined as ≥5 medications, is a rising public health concern due to its many risks of harm. One commonly recommended strategy to address polypharmacy is medication reviews, with subsequent deprescription of inappropriate medications. In this review, we explore the intersection of older age, polypharmacy, and deprescribing in a contemporary context by appraising the published literature (2012-2022) to identify articles that included new primary data on deprescribing medications in patients aged ≥65 years currently taking ≥5 medications. We found 31 articles were found which describe the current perceptions of clinicians towards deprescribing, the identified barriers, key enabling factors, and future directions in approaching deprescribing. Currently, clinicians believe that deprescribing is a complex process, and despite the majority of clinicians reporting feeling comfortable in deprescribing, fewer engage with this process regularly. Common barriers cited include a lack of knowledge and training around the deprescribing process, a lack of time, a breakdown in communication, perceived 'abandonment of care', fear of adverse consequences, and resistance from patients and/or their carers. Common enabling factors of deprescribing include recognition of key opportunities to instigate this process, regular medication reviews, improving lines of communication, education of both patients and clinicians and a multidisciplinary approach towards patient care. Addressing polypharmacy requires a nuanced approach in a generally complex group of patients. Key strategies to reducing the risks of polypharmacy include education of patients and clinicians, in addition to improving communication between healthcare providers in a multidisciplinary approach.
| S-EPMC10806180 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceBetter understanding of patients' attitudes toward deprescribing specific medications will inform future deprescribing interventions.ObjectiveTo investigate older adults' attitudes toward deprescribing by investigating which medications they would like to have deprescribed, the reasons why, and patient factors associated with interest in deprescribing.Design, setting, and participantsThis survey study was conducted from May 2022 to December 2023 in primary care settings in 14 countries. Patients aged 65 years or older taking 5 or more medications were consecutively recruited by their general practitioner (GP) and completed the questionnaire.ExposuresPatient characteristics, including gender, number of medications, GP gender, education level, financial status, confidence in completing medical forms, self-rated health, satisfaction with medications, trust in the GP, and country.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcomes were patient attitudes toward deprescribing specific medications, as measured by responses to the question, "Thinking about your current medication list, are there any medications that you would like to stop taking or reduce the dose of?" Multilevel multivariable logistic regression analysis was used, adjusted for clustering effect at the country level, to investigate the association between patient characteristics and interest in deprescribing.ResultsOf 1340 patients (mean [SD], 96 [47] patients per country), 736 (55%) were women, 580 (44%) had secondary school as their highest level of education, 1089 (82%) were satisfied with their medications, and 589 (44%) expressed they would like to deprescribe 1 or more of their medications. Patients expressed interest in deprescribing specific medications at varying levels, from 79% (86 of 109 patients) in Poland to 23% (21 of 96 patients) in Bulgaria. The 3 most reported medications patients would like to have deprescribed were diuretics (111 of 1002 medications [11%]), lipid-modifying agents (109 of 1002 medications [11%]), and agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system (83 of 1002 medications [8%]). The odds of naming at least 1 specific medication for deprescribing were lower for patients with higher medication satisfaction (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.21-0.47) and for patients with higher trust in their GP (odds ratio, 0.960; 95% CI, 0.930-0.998).Conclusions and relevanceIn this survey study with primary care patients aged 65 years and older, patient attitudes toward deprescribing specific medications varied across countries, demonstrating that deprescribing interventions could be more impactful when adapted to specific settings and contexts. These findings highlight the importance of patient-practitioner communication in ensuring appropriate medication use.
| S-EPMC11811803 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDeprescribing has been recommended for managing polypharmacy but deprescribing preventive medication in older patients is still uncommon. We aimed to investigate older patients' barriers to and enablers of deprescribing cardiometabolic medication.MethodsTwo focus groups were conducted among patients ≥70 years with polypharmacy, including cardiometabolic medication. Purposive sampling through four community pharmacies was used in two regions in the Netherlands. A topic list was developed using literature and the theoretical domains framework (TDF). The meetings were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded using thematic coding, attribute coding and the TDF. In addition, patients were categorized on attitudes towards medication and willingness to stop.ResultsThe meetings were attended by 17 patients and 1 caregiver (71 to 84 years). In total 15 barriers and 13 enablers were identified within four themes, partly related to beliefs, fears and experiences regarding using or stopping medication, and partly related to the relationship with the health care professional and the conditions to stop. Some patients attributed their wellbeing to their medication and were therefore unwilling to stop. Reducing cardiometabolic medication because of less strict treatment targets confused some patients and was a barrier to deprescribing. Having options to monitor clinical measurements and restart medication were enablers. Patients were only willing to stop cardiometabolic medication when this was proposed by a HCP they trusted. Patients with a positive attitude towards medication varied in their willingness to stop cardiometabolic medication. Patients with a negative attitude towards medication were generally willing to stop medication but still perceived several barriers and may consider some medication as being essential.ConclusionFears, beliefs, and experiences regarding using and stopping medication as well as trust in the HCP influence willingness to have medication deprescribed. Attitudes towards medication in general do not necessarily translate into willingness or unwillingness to stop specific medication. For deprescribing cardiometabolic medication, patient involvement when setting new treatment targets and monitoring the effects on short-term outcomes are important.
| S-EPMC7468428 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAdverse anticholinergic drug reactions are common, yet evidence on how to reduce exposure to anticholinergic activity and reliably measure successful deprescribing is still scant. This study proposes an algorithm-based approach to evaluate and reduce anticholinergic load, and reports the results of its pilot testing.MethodsBased on published evidence and expert opinion, a list of 85 anticholinergic drugs and 21 algorithms for reducing anticholinergic load, e.g., by recommending alternative drugs with lower risk, were developed. An accompanying test battery was assembled by focusing on instruments that sensitively reflect anticholinergic load and may be sensitive to depict changes (Neuropsychological Assessment Battery to measure memory and attention, validated assessments for constipation, urinary symptoms, and xerostomia, as well as blood biomarkers). The approach was pilot-tested in a geriatric rehabilitation unit, with clinician feedback as the primary outcome and characterization of anticholinergic symptoms as the secondary outcome. The intervention was delivered by a pharmacist and a clinical pharmacologist who used the algorithms to generate personalized recommendation letters.ResultsWe included a total of 20 patients, 13 with anticholinergic drugs and 7 without. Recommendations were made for 22 drugs in nine patients from the intervention group, of which seven letters (78%) were considered helpful and 8/22 (36%) anticholinergic drugs were discontinued, reducing anticholinergic load in seven patients. In contrast to patients without drug change, memory assessment in patients with reduced anticholinergic load improved significantly after 2 weeks (6 ± 3 vs. -1 ± 6 points).ConclusionsThe approach was well received by the participating physicians and might support standardized anticholinergic deprescribing.
| S-EPMC10869417 | biostudies-literature