Fairness violations elicit greater punishment on behalf of another than for oneself.

ABSTRACT: Classic psychology and economic studies argue that punishment is the standard response to violations of fairness norms. Typically, individuals are presented with the option to punish the transgressor or not. However, such a narrow choice set may fail to capture stronger alternative preferences for restoring justice. Here we show, in contrast to the majority of findings on social punishment, that other forms of justice restoration (for example, compensation to the victim) are strongly preferred to punitive measures. Furthermore, these alternative preferences for restoring justice depend on the perspective of the deciding agent. When people are the recipient of an unfair offer, they prefer to compensate themselves without seeking retribution, even when punishment is free. Yet when people obs

SUBMITTER: FeldmanHall O 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4266485 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature