Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Classically, studies adopting non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation have placed greater importance on the position of the primary "stimulating" electrode than the secondary "reference" electrode. However, recent current density modeling suggests that ascribing a neutral role to the reference electrode may prove an inappropriate oversimplification.Hypothesis
We set out to test the hypothesis that the behavioral effects of transcranial electrical stimulation are critically dependent on the position of the return ("reference") electrode.Methods
We examined the effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation (sinusoidal waveform with no direct current offset at a peak-to-peak amplitude of 2000 μA and a frequency matched to each participant's
SUBMITTER: Mehta AR
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4319690 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Mar-Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature