Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To systematically review outcomes after mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repairs in women with apical prolapse.Data sources
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 4, 2012.Methods of study selection
For anatomic and functional analyses, we included studies comparing mesh sacrocolpopexy to native tissue vaginal repairs with at least 6 months follow-up. The primary outcome was anatomic "success" after surgery. Secondary outcomes were reoperation and symptom outcomes. We included large case series and comparative studies with shorter follow-up to increase power for adverse event analyses.Tabulation, integration, and results
Evidence quality was assessed
SUBMITTER: Siddiqui NY
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4352548 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature