A new comparison of nested case-control and case-cohort designs and methods.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Existing literature comparing statistical properties of nested case-control and case-cohort methods have become insufficient for present day epidemiologists. The literature has not reconciled conflicting conclusions about the standard methods. Moreover, a comparison including newly developed methods, such as inverse probability weighting methods, is needed. Two analytical methods for nested case-control studies and six methods for case-cohort studies using proportional hazards regression model were summarized and their statistical properties were compared. The answer to which design and method is more powerful was more nuanced than what was previously reported. For both nested case-control and case-cohort designs, inverse probability weighting methods were more powerful than the standard m
SUBMITTER: Kim RS
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4374014 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA