Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke have had inconsistent results. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy in published RCTs.Methods
We performed a systematic review of RCTs of endovascular therapy with thrombolytic or mechanical reperfusion compared with interventions without endovascular therapy. Primary outcome was the frequency of good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0-2 at 90 days) and secondary outcomes were mortality at 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Random-effects meta-analysis was performed and the Cochrane risk of bias assessment was used to evaluate quality of evidence.Results
Ten studies involving 1,612 subjects were included. End
SUBMITTER: Osanai T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4410940 | biostudies-literature | 2015
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature