Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Previous research looking at published systematic reviews has shown that their search strategies are often suboptimal and that librarian involvement, though recommended, is low. Confidence in the results, however, is limited due to poor reporting of search strategies the published articles.Objectives
To more accurately measure the use of recommended search methods in systematic reviews, the levels of librarian involvement, and whether librarian involvement predicts the use of recommended methods.Methods
A survey was sent to all authors of English-language systematic reviews indexed in the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) from January 2012 through January 2014. The survey asked about their use of search methods recommended by the Institut
SUBMITTER: Koffel JB
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4418838 | biostudies-literature | 2015
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature