Unknown

Dataset Information

Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants.


ABSTRACT: We compared whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in six unrelated individuals. In the regions targeted by WES capture (81.5% of the consensus coding genome), the mean numbers of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions/deletions (indels) detected per sample were 84,192 and 13,325, respectively, for WES, and 84,968 and 12,702, respectively, for WGS. For both SNVs and indels, the distributions of coverage depth, genotype quality, and minor read ratio were more uniform for WGS than for WES. After filtering, a mean of 74,398 (95.3%) high-quality (HQ) SNVs and 9,033 (70.6%) HQ indels were called by both platforms. A mean of 105 coding HQ SNVs and 32 indels was identified exclusively by WES whereas 692 HQ SNVs and 105 indels were identified exclusively by

SUBMITTER: Belkadi A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4418901 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Sorry, this publication's infomation has not been loaded in the Indexer, please go directly to PUBMED or Altmetric.

Similar Datasets