Project description:BackgroundExpansion of health insurance coverage, and hence clinical preventive services (CPS), provides an opportunity for improvements in the health of adults. The degree to which expansion of health insurance coverage affects the use of CPS is unknown.ObjectiveTo assess whether Massachusetts health reform was associated with changes in healthcare access and use of CPS.DesignWe used a difference-in-differences framework to examine change in healthcare access and use of CPS among working-aged adults pre-reform (2002-2005) and post-reform (2007-2010) in Massachusetts compared with change in other New England states (ONES).SettingPopulation-based, cross-sectional Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys.ParticipantsA total of 208,831 survey participants aged 18 to 64 years.InterventionMassachusetts health reform enacted in 2006.MeasurementsFour healthcare access measures outcomes and five CPS.Key resultsThe proportions of adults who had health insurance coverage, a healthcare provider, no cost barrier to healthcare, an annual routine checkup, and a colorectal cancer screening increased significantly more in Massachusetts than those in the ONES. In Massachusetts, the prevalence of cervical cancer screening in pre-reform and post-reform periods was about the same; however, the ONES had a decrease of -1.6 percentage points (95 % confidence interval [CI] -2.5, -0.7; p <0.001). As a result, the prevalence of cervical cancer screening in Massachusetts was increased relative to the ONES (1.7, 95 % CI 0.2, 3.2; p = 0.02). Cholesterol screening, influenza immunization, and breast cancer screening did not improve more in Massachusetts than in the ONES.LimitationsData are self-reported.ConclusionsHealth reform may increase healthcare access and improve use of CPS. However, the effects of health reform on CPS use may vary by type of service and by state.
Project description:BackgroundPersons with Down syndrome (DS) require preventive care that addresses their age-/gender- and syndrome-specific needs. Yet, adolescents and adults with DS do not receive these preventive care services as recommended.Objective/hypothesisTo identify factors that predict receipt of age-/gender- and syndrome-specific preventive healthcare among adolescents and adults with DS. We hypothesized that more healthcare encounters and greater medical complexity would increase receipt of preventive care due to more opportunities to complete these activities.MethodsUsing Medicaid claims (2006-2010) for California, Colorado, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adolescents and adults with DS (≥12 years old). We modeled receipt of both ≥1 wellness examination and ≥1 thyroid function test (TFT) in 2009-2010 as a function of receipt of those same healthcare activities in 2006-08, adjusting for demographics, key comorbidities, and medical complexity using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsIn this cohort of 3487 adolescents and adults with DS accessing Medicaid, 17% received both ≥1 wellness examination and ≥1 TFT in 2006-2008, 15% in 2009-2010, and only 7% during both time periods. Despite medical complexity and frequent healthcare interactions, the best predictor of future receipt of these activities was past receipt. State of residence variably impacted receipt of these preventive activities.ConclusionsAlthough past receipt of wellness examination and TFT was the best predictor of future receipt of these activities, overall rates were quite low in this cohort of adolescents and adults with DS. Further work is needed to improve preventive healthcare delivery to this vulnerable population.
Project description:IntroductionThis study aims to evaluate the trends in the impact of Medicaid expansion on the use of selected recommended clinical preventive services and examine the differences in use by income level over time.MethodsThe data were obtained from the 2011-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and were analyzed in 2021. This study conducted a difference-in-differences analysis of the association between Medicaid expansion and the use of 5 clinical preventive services, including colon/breast/cervical cancer screenings, HIV testing, and influenza vaccination. Annual percentage change was applied to assess the trends in the impact of Medicaid expansion on the use of clinical preventive services.ResultsThe use of all the 5 clinical preventive services varied over time. In almost every year, the use of 4 clinical preventive services (all but HIV testing) among Medicaid expansion states was higher than that among the nonexpansion states. People with lower income used 4 clinical preventive services (all but HIV testing) less frequently than those with higher income, regardless of their residence in expansion or nonexpansion groups. Among the lower-income group, the use of 5 clinical preventive services increased after Medicaid expansion almost every year, with the use of colon cancer screening and HIV testing reaching statistical significance and the impact of Medicaid expansion in the use of each clinical preventive service kept stable from 2014 to 2019.ConclusionsThese findings provide evidence that Medicaid expansion may be associated with sustainably increased use of the selected recommended clinical preventive services among the lower-income population and that Medicaid expansion to reduce financial barriers may be an effective strategy to improve population health.
Project description:AimTo investigate the use of general practitioners and urgent care centres (UCC) among children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP) compared to a control group, and per gross motor function level.MethodData on children with CP born 1996 to 2014 were collected from the Norwegian Quality and Surveillance Registry for Cerebral Palsy. A control group was extracted from Statistics Norway. The date and diagnosis codes for general practitioner and UCC contacts from 2006 to 2015 were collected from the Norwegian Control and Payment of Health Reimbursement Database. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) for the number of contacts per person-year with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Poisson regression. Risk differences with 95% CI were used to compare cumulative diagnosis incidences between children with CP and the control group.ResultsThe study included 2510 children (1457 males; 58.1%) with CP and 12 041 (7003 males; 58.2%) without CP (mean age in both groups 7 years 2 months, SD 4 years 8 months, range 0-19 years), with 336 250 contacts. Children with CP had more general practitioner (IRR 1.47; 95% CI 1.29-1.67) and UCC (IRR 1.30; 95% CI 1.13-1.50) contacts than children without CP, for all ages. IRRs remained unchanged when comparing children with CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I and II to children without CP. Among children with CP, contact increased as GMFCS levels increased, and they were in contact most often for respiratory and general and unspecified diagnoses. The risk for epilepsy was highest for those in contact with general practitioners.InterpretationChildren with CP, including those with less severe motor impairments, contacted general practitioners and UCCs more than children without CP. However, contact increased as gross motor impairment increased. They had contact for many diagnoses, mostly respiratory.
Project description:BackgroundIn Germany, various preventive services are offered to children and adolescents. These include regular standardized examinations (so called U/J examinations) and several vaccinations. Although strongly recommended, most of them are not mandatory. Our aim is to identify factors associated with the use of U/J examinations and vaccination against diphtheria, hepatitis B, Hib, pertussis, polio, and tetanus. While previous research has focused on sociodemographic factors, we also include socioeconomic, behavioral, and psychosocial factors.MethodsWe analyzed cross-sectional data from 15,023 participants (aged 0-17 years) of the nationwide representative KiGGS Wave 2 Survey. Participation in U/J examinations was assessed using a questionnaire, filled out by participants and/or their parents. Information on vaccination status was drawn from the participants' vaccination booklets. To identify relevant determinants for the use of preventive examinations and vaccinations, unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were employed with up to 16 different independent variables.ResultsVarious independent variables showed an association with the use of preventive services. Higher socioeconomic status, absence of migration background, and lower household size were associated with significantly higher utilization of U examinations. Parents' marital status, area of residence, behavioral and psychosocial factors yielded insignificant results for most U/J examinations. Higher vaccination rates were found for children with no migration background, with residence in eastern Germany, lower household size, and with married parents.ConclusionThis study attempted to depict the influence of sociodemographic, psychosocial, and behavioral factors on the use of several preventive services. Our results indicate that predominantly sociodemographic variables influence the use of preventive services. Further efforts should be made to investigate the interplay of different determinants of healthcare use in children and adolescents.
Project description:ObjectiveAlthough a growing body of research shows that life satisfaction is linked with enhanced health behaviors and physical health, no study has examined life satisfaction's association with use of preventive health care services. From prior research the authors hypothesized that people with higher life satisfaction would be more proactive in taking care of their health, hence more likely to use preventive health care services.MethodMultiple logistic regression models were used to examine the association between life satisfaction and preventive services. Participants were drawn from the Health and Retirement Study, a prospective and nationally representative panel study of adults (age >50). Participants' use of preventive services was collected over 2 years of follow-up.ResultsIn models adjusting for sociodemographic factors, each standard deviation increase in life satisfaction was associated with a higher likelihood that people would obtain a cholesterol test. Further, women with higher life satisfaction were more likely to obtain a mammogram-x-ray or pap smear and also regularly check their breasts for lumps, whereas men were more likely to obtain a prostate exam.ConclusionHigher life satisfaction was associated with higher use of several preventive services. A growing body of randomized controlled trials targeting life satisfaction has shown that levels of life satisfaction are modifiable. Thus, if these findings are replicated, life satisfaction may provide an important target for interventions aimed at enhancing preventive behaviors and health.
Project description:Purpose in life has been linked with better health (mental and physical) and health behaviors, but its link with patterns of health care use are understudied. We hypothesized that people with higher purpose would be more proactive in taking care of their health, as indicated by a higher likelihood of using preventive health care services. We also hypothesized that people with higher purpose would spend fewer nights in the hospital. Participants (n = 7,168) were drawn from the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative panel study of American adults over the age of 50, and tracked for 6 y. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, each unit increase in purpose (on a six-point scale) was associated with a higher likelihood that people would obtain a cholesterol test [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.29] or colonoscopy (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.99-1.14). Furthermore, females were more likely to receive a mammogram/X-ray (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.16-1.39) or pap smear (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.06-1.28), and males were more likely to receive a prostate examination (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.18-1.45). Each unit increase in purpose was also associated with 17% fewer nights spent in the hospital (rate ratio = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.77-0.89). An increasing number of randomized controlled trials show that purpose in life can be raised. Therefore, with additional research, findings from this study may inform the development of new strategies that increase the use of preventive health care services, offset the burden of rising health care costs, and enhance the quality of life among people moving into the ranks of our aging society.
Project description:ImportanceAutomated external defibrillator (AED) use is increasing, but use in children is uncommon. A growing literature of use in children by lay rescuers warrants review.ObjectiveA systematic review of AED effectiveness in children experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).Data sourcesPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials.Study selectionChildren, ages 0-18, experiencing OHCA with an AED applied by a lay rescuer. Control population: children with no AED application.Data extraction and synthesisResults are reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Two authors independently reviewed all titles and abstracts of references identified by the search strategy, then generated a subset which all authors reviewed.Main outcomes and measuresCritical outcomes were survival with Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-2 at hospital discharge or 30 days and survival to hospital discharge.ResultsPopulation: age categories: <1 year, 1-12 years, 13-18 years. Lay rescuer AED application resulted in improved survival with CPC 1-2 at hospital discharge or 30 days to hospital discharge in age groups 1-12 and 13-18 years (RR 3.84 [95 % CI 2.69-5.5], RR 3.75 [95 %CI 2.97-4.72]), respectively and hospital discharge in both groups(RR 3.04 [95 % CI 2.18-4.25], RR 3.38 [95 % CI 2.17-4.16]), respectively. AED use with CPR improved CPC 1-2 at hospital discharge and hospital discharge (RR 1.49 [95 % CI 1.11-1.97], RR 1.55[1.12-2.12]).ConclusionsAED application by lay rescuers is associated with improved survival with a CPC of 1-2 at 30 days, and improved survival to hospital discharge for children 1-18 years. There are limited data for children < 1 year.
Project description:The Healthy Aging Partnerships in Prevention Initiative (HAPPI) is a multisectoral collaboration that aims to increase use of recommended cancer screening and other clinical preventive services (CPS) among underserved African American and Latino adults aged 50 and older in South Los Angeles. HAPPI uses the principles of the evidence-based model Sickness Prevention Achieved through Regional Collaboration to increase capacity for the delivery of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening, as well as influenza and pneumococcal immunizations, and cholesterol screening. This article describes HAPPI's collaborative efforts to enhance local capacity by training personnel from community health centers (CHCs) and community-based organizations (CBOs), implementing a small grants program, and forming a community advisory council. HAPPI demonstrates that existing resources in the region can be successfully linked and leveraged to increase awareness and receipt of CPS. Five CHCs expanded quality improvement efforts and eight CBOs reached 2,730 older African Americans and Latinos through locally tailored educational programs that encouraged community-clinic linkages. A community council assumed leadership roles to ensure HAPPI sustainability. The lessons learned from these collective efforts hold promise for increasing awareness and fostering the use of CPS by older adults in underserved communities.
Project description:ObjectiveTo determine the association between enrollment in patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) and the receipt of preventive services among adolescents and young adults.MethodsRetrospective cohort study including patients of Hennepin County aged 10 to 24 who had face-to-face or telephone encounters with health care providers between 2010 and 2014 at clinics with PCMHs at the Hennepin County Medical Center, Minnesota. Exposure was enrollment in PCMHs. Outcomes were receipt of (1) preventive visits; (2) prescriptions for influenza, meningococcal, and human papillomavirus vaccinations; (3) screening for sexually transmitted infections; (4) prescription of any contraceptive and long-acting reversible contraceptives; and (5) cervical cancer screening. Generalized mixed effect models in a propensity-score-matched sample were used for data analysis.ResultsOverall, 21 704 patients were included. Most patients were female, US-born, Hispanic/Latino, with an average age of 20.8 years. Patients enrolled in PCMH (n = 729) were more likely to be Latino, students, and have health insurance (P < .001). Adjusted odds ratios (99% confidence intervals) comparing the receipt of preventive services of patients enrolled in PCMHs to youth who did not receive these services were as follows: (1) preventive visits 1.10 (0.93-1.29); (2) influenza 0.89 (0.74-1.07), meningococcal 1.53 (1.30-1.80), and human papillomavirus vaccinations 1.53 (1.28-1.84); (3) screening for sexually transmitted infections 1.69 (1.28-2.24); (4) prescription of any type of contraception 2.18 (1.56-3.03) and long-acting reversible contraceptives 2.66 (1.89-3.74); and (5) cervical cancer screening 1.14 (0.87-1.48).ConclusionsOverall, patients enrolled in PCMHs had higher odds of receiving multiple preventive services.