Event representations constrain the structure of language: Sign language as a window into universally accessible linguistic biases.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: According to a theoretical tradition dating back to Aristotle, verbs can be classified into two broad categories. Telic verbs (e.g., "decide," "sell," "die") encode a logical endpoint, whereas atelic verbs (e.g., "think," "negotiate," "run") do not, and the denoted event could therefore logically continue indefinitely. Here we show that sign languages encode telicity in a seemingly universal way and moreover that even nonsigners lacking any prior experience with sign language understand these encodings. In experiments 1-5, nonsigning English speakers accurately distinguished between telic (e.g., "decide") and atelic (e.g., "think") signs from (the historically unrelated) Italian Sign Language, Sign Language of the Netherlands, and Turkish Sign Language. These results were not due to partic
SUBMITTER: Strickland B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4434776 | biostudies-literature | 2015 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA