Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To determine whether, given a limited budget, a state's low-income uninsured population would have greater benefit from a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program using colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical testing (FIT).Data sources/study setting
South Carolina's low-income, uninsured population.Study design
Comparative effectiveness analysis using microsimulation modeling to estimate the number of individuals screened, CRC cases prevented, CRC deaths prevented, and life-years gained from a screening program using colonoscopy versus a program using annual FIT in South Carolina's low-income, uninsured population. This analysis assumed an annual budget of $1 million and a budget availability of 2 years as a base case.Principal findings
The annual FIT
SUBMITTER: van der Steen A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4450929 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature