Dataset Information

Alternative Ultrasound Gel for a Sustainable Ultrasound Program: Application of Human Centered Design.

ABSTRACT: This paper describes design of a low cost, ultrasound gel from local products applying aspects of Human Centered Design methodology. A multidisciplinary team worked with clinicians who use ultrasound where commercial gel is cost prohibitive and scarce. The team followed the format outlined in the Ideo Took Kit. Research began by defining the challenge "how to create locally available alternative ultrasound gel for a low-resourced environment? The "End-Users," were identified as clinicians who use ultrasound in Democratic Republic of the Congo and Ethiopia. An expert group was identified and queried for possible alternatives to commercial gel. Responses included shampoo, oils, water and cornstarch. Cornstarch, while a reasonable solution, was either not available or too expensive. We then sought deeper knowledge of locally sources materials from local experts, market vendors, to develop a similar product. Suggested solutions gleaned from these interviews were collected and used to create ultrasound gel accounting for cost, image quality, manufacturing capability. Initial prototypes used cassava root flour from Great Lakes Region (DRC, Rwanda, Uganda, Tanzania) and West Africa, and bula from Ethiopia. Prototypes were tested in the field and resulting images evaluated by our user group. A final prototype was then selected. Cassava and bula at a 32 part water, 8 part flour and 4 part salt, heated, mixed then cooled was the product design of choice.

SUBMITTER: Salmon M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4529075 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Alternative Ultrasound Gel for a Sustainable Ultrasound Program: Application of Human Centered Design.

Salmon Margaret M Salmon Christian C Bissinger Alexa A Muller Mundenga Mutendi MM Gebreyesus Alegnta A Geremew Haimanot H Wendel Sarah K SK Azaza Aklilu A Salumu Maurice M Benfield Nerys N

PloS one 20150807 8

This paper describes design of a low cost, ultrasound gel from local products applying aspects of Human Centered Design methodology. A multidisciplinary team worked with clinicians who use ultrasound where commercial gel is cost prohibitive and scarce. The team followed the format outlined in the Ideo Took Kit. Research began by defining the challenge "how to create locally available alternative ultrasound gel for a low-resourced environment? The "End-Users," were identified as clinicians who us ...[more]

PMID: 26252003

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHuman-centered design, or design thinking, offers an extensive toolkit of methods and strategies for user-centered engagement that lends itself well to intervention development and implementation. These methods can be applied to the fields of public health and medicine to design interventions that may be more feasible and viable in real-world contexts than those developed with different methods.ObjectiveThe design team aimed to develop approaches to building food skills among caregivers of children aged 0-5 years who are eligible for a federal food assistance program while they were in the grocery store.MethodsThey applied 3 specific human-centered design methods-Extremes and Mainstreams, Journey Mapping, and Co-Creation Sessions-to collaboratively develop intervention approaches to enhance Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education (SNAP-Ed) reach and impact across food retail settings. Extremes and Mainstreams is a specific kind of purposive sampling that selects individuals based on characteristics beyond demographics. Journey Mapping is a visual tool that asks individuals to identify key moments and decision points during an experience. Co-Creation Sessions are choreographed opportunities for individuals to explicitly contribute to the design of a solution alongside research or design team members.ResultsTen caregivers with diverse lived experiences were selected to participate in remote design thinking workshops and create individual journey maps to depict their grocery store experiences. Common happy points and pain points were identified. Nine stakeholders, including caregivers, SNAP-Ed staff, and grocery store dieticians, cocreated 2 potential intervention approaches informed by caregivers' experiences and needs: a rewards program and a meal box option.ConclusionsThese 3 human-centered design methods led to a meaningful co-design process where proposed interventions aligned with caregivers' wants and needs. This case study provides other public health practitioners with specific examples of how to use these methods in program development and stakeholder engagement as well as lessons learned when adapting these methods to remote settings.

Project description:BackgroundHuman-centered design (HCD) approaches to health care strive to support the development of innovative, effective, and person-centered solutions for health care. Although their use is increasing, there is no integral overview describing the details of HCD methods in health innovations.ObjectiveThis review aims to explore the current practices of HCD approaches for the development of health innovations, with the aim of providing an overview of the applied methods for participatory and HCD processes and highlighting their shortcomings for further research.MethodsA narrative review of health research was conducted based on systematic electronic searches in the PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts (2000-2020) databases using keywords related to human-centered design, design thinking (DT), and user-centered design (UCD). Abstracts and full-text articles were screened by 2 reviewers independently based on predefined inclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on the methodology used throughout the research process, the choice of methods in different phases of the innovation cycle, and the level of engagement of end users.ResultsThis review summarizes the application of HCD practices across various areas of health innovation. All approaches prioritized the user's needs and the participatory and iterative nature of the design process. The design processes comprised several design cycles during which multiple qualitative and quantitative methods were used in combination with specific design methods. HCD- and DT-based research primarily targeted understanding the research context and defining the problem, whereas UCD-based work focused mainly on the direct generation of solutions. Although UCD approaches involved end users primarily as testers and informants, HCD and DT approaches involved end users most often as design partners.ConclusionsWe have provided an overview of the currently applied methodologies and HCD guidelines to assist health care professionals and design researchers in their methodological choices. HCD-based techniques are challenging to evaluate using traditional biomedical research methods. Previously proposed reporting guidelines are a step forward but would require a level of detail that is incompatible with the current publishing landscape. Hence, further development is needed in this area. Special focus should be placed on the congruence between the chosen methods, design strategy, and achievable outcomes. Furthermore, power dimensions, agency, and intersectionality need to be considered in co-design sessions with multiple stakeholders, especially when including vulnerable groups.

Project description:BackgroundSmart glasses have emerged as a promising solution for enhancing communication and care coordination among distributed medical teams. While prior research has explored the feasibility of using smart glasses to improve prehospital communication between emergency medical service (EMS) providers and remote physicians, a research gap remains in understanding the specific requirements and needs of EMS providers for smart glass implementation.ObjectiveThis study aims to iteratively design and evaluate a smart glass application tailored for prehospital communication by actively involving prospective users in the system design process.MethodsGrounded in participatory design, the study consisted of 2 phases of design requirement gathering, rapid prototyping, usability testing, and prototype refinement. In total, 43 distinct EMS providers with diverse backgrounds participated in this 2-year long iterative design process. All qualitative data (eg, transcribed interviews and discussions) were iteratively coded and analyzed by at least 2 researchers using thematic analysis. Quantitative data, such as System Usability Scale (SUS) scores and feature ratings, were analyzed using statistical methods.ResultsOur research identified challenges in 2 essential prehospital communication activities: contacting online medical control (OLMC) physicians for medical guidance and notifying receiving hospital teams of incoming patients. The iterative design process led to the identification of 5 key features that could potentially address the identified challenges: video call functionality with OLMC physicians, call priority indication for expedited OLMC contact, direct communication with receiving hospitals, multimedia patient information sharing, and touchless interaction methods for operating the smart glasses. The SUS score for our system design improved from a mean of 74.3 (SD 11.3) in the first phase (classified as good usability) to 80.3 (SD 13.1) in the second phase (classified as excellent usability). This improvement, along with consistently high ratings for other aspects (eg, willingness to use and feature design), demonstrated continuous enhancement of the system's design across the 2 phases. Additionally, significant differences in SUS scores were observed between EMS providers in urban areas (median 85, IQR 76-94) and rural areas (median 72.5, IQR 66-83; Mann-Whitney U=43; P=.17), as well as between paramedics (median 72.5, IQR 70-80) and emergency medical technicians (median 85, IQR: 74-98; Mann-Whitney U=44.5; P=.13), suggesting that EMS providers in urban settings and those with less training in treating patients in critical conditions perceived the smart glass application as more useful and user-friendly. Finally, the study also identified several concerns regarding the adoption of the smart glass application, including technical limitations, environmental constraints, and potential barriers to workflow integration.ConclusionsUsing a participatory design approach, this study provided insights into designing user-friendly smart glasses that address the current challenges EMS providers face in dynamic prehospital settings.

Dataset Information

Alternative Ultrasound Gel for a Sustainable Ultrasound Program: Application of Human Centered Design.

Publications

Alternative Ultrasound Gel for a Sustainable Ultrasound Program: Application of Human Centered Design.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets