How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals.

ABSTRACT: Delays in peer reviewed publication may have consequences for both assessment of scientific prowess in academics as well as communication of important information to the knowledge receptor community. We present an analysis on the perspectives of authors publishing in conservation biology journals regarding their opinions on the importance of speed in peer-review as well as how to improve review times. Authors were invited to take part in an online questionnaire, of which the data was subjected to both qualitative (open coding, categorizing) and quantitative analyses (generalized linear models). We received 637 responses to a total of 6,547 e-mail invitations sent. Peer-review speed was generally perceived as slow, with authors experiencing a typical turnaround time of 14 weeks while their

SUBMITTER: Nguyen VM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4533968 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature