Dataset Information

Health-related quality of life and hospital costs following esophageal resection: a prospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT: The incidence rates for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus are increasing while the prognosis has only improved slightly. There is no apparent benefit in short- and long-term survival after different surgical strategies, but surgery is associated with significant morbidity. The goal of this study is to prospectively assess the quality of life and hospital costs after esophageal resections depending on the development of complications.Prospective data was collected from 47 patients undergoing an esophageal resection for esophageal cancer participating in the prospective LAParotomy or LAParoscopy and Adhesions (LAPAD) study (clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT01236625). A comparison was made between patients who developed major complications and minor or no complications regarding quality of life and hospital costs.Thirteen patients developed major complications while 34 patients developed only minor or no complications. Patients with major complications had a mean hospital cost of $16,369 vs $12,409 for patients without or with minor complications. We found no difference in quality of life between the two groups 6 months after surgery.In our cohort, major complications did not seem to have a detrimental effect on postoperative quality of life 6 months after surgery but they increased costs associated with esophageal resection.

SUBMITTER: Strik C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4558724 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Health-related quality of life and hospital costs following esophageal resection: a prospective cohort study.

Strik C C ten Broek R P RP van der Kolk M M van Goor H H Bonenkamp J J JJ

World journal of surgical oncology 20150904

<h4>Background</h4>The incidence rates for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus are increasing while the prognosis has only improved slightly. There is no apparent benefit in short- and long-term survival after different surgical strategies, but surgery is associated with significant morbidity. The goal of this study is to prospectively assess the quality of life and hospital costs after esophageal resections depending on the development of complications.<h4>Methods</h4>Prospective data was collected ...[more]

PMID: 26338109

Similar Datasets

Project description:Interventions: Elective or emergent colonic resection, defined using the procedural ICD-10 codes: 32000-00 Limited excision of large intestine with formation of stoma 32000-01 Right hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32000-02 Laparoscopic limited excision of large intestine with formation of stoma 32000-03 Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32003-00 Limited excision of large intestine with anastomosis 32003-01 Right hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32003-02 Laparoscopic limited excision of large intestine with anastomosis 32003-03 Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32004-00 Subtotal colectomy with formation of stoma 32004-01 Extended right hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32004-02 Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with formation of stoma 32004-03 Laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32005-00 Subtotal colectomy with anastomosis 32005-01 Extended right hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32005-02 Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with anastomosis 32005-03 Laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32006-00 Left hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32006-01 Left hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32006-02 Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with anastomosis 32006-03 Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with formation of stoma 32009-00 Total colectomy with ileostomy 32009-01 Laparoscopic total colectomy with ileostomy 32012-00 Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis 32012-01 Laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis The procedures were performed at the Austin Hospital, a tertiary hospital with colorectal expertise, over the period of January 2013 and June 2018. Patients were followed-up for 30 days following discharge from the index admission. If no subsequent readmissions occurred within this period, follow-up ceased. If a patient was readmitted within the 30-day period, then the readmission was included, and followi Primary outcome(s): Costs of complications (as a composite outcome) following Colon resections. Costs of complications defined as cost of patients with complications less the cost of patients without complications (ie by comparison of patients with and without complications). All costs related to the index admission for colon resection and any consequent readmissions are included. Costs related to preoperative course are not considered. Allocation of costs will be calculated using an activity-based costing methodology. Only in-hospital costs are considered, with both direct and indirect costs assessed to produce a total cost for each patient. Costs for each patient will be obtained from the Austin Health Department of Finance, which maintain an itemised prospective database of all hospital expenses related to each patient.[Costs will be calculated from day of surgery to hospital discharge. Readmissions are considered within 30 days of discharge from the index admission.] Study Design: Purpose: Natural history;Duration: Longitudinal;Selection: Defined population;Timing: Retrospective

Project description:Interventions: There is no participant involvement. Only the de-identified hospital medical record of patients who have undergone surgery will be reviewed. We will review the following ICD Codes: 30515-03 Ileocolic resection with anastomosis 30515-04 Laparoscopic ileocolic resection with anastomosis 30515-05 Ileocolic resection with formation of stoma 30515-06 Laparoscopic ileocolic resection with formation of stoma 30565-00 Resection of small intestine with formation of stoma 30566-00 Resection of small intestine with anastomosis The procedures were performed at the Austin Hospital, a tertiary hospital with small bowel expertise, over the period of January 2013 and June 2018. Patients were followed-up for 30 days following discharge from the index admission. If no subsequent re-admissions occurred within this period, follow-up ceased. If a patient was readmitted within the 30-day period, then the readmission was included, and following discharge from the readmission or end of the original 30-day period, whichever was later, follow-up ceased. Primary outcome(s): Costs of complications as a composite outcome defined as cost of patients with complications less the cost of patients without complications (i.e. by comparison of patients with and without complications). All costs related to the index admission for small bowel resections and any consequent readmissions are included. Costs related to preoperative course are not considered. Allocation of costs will be done based on service volume, and costs calculated using an activity-based costing methodology. Only in-hospital costs are considered, with both direct and indirect costs assessed to produce a total cost for each patient. Costs for each patient will be obtained from the Austin Health Department of Finance, which maintain an itemised prospective database of all hospital expenses related to each patient.[Costs will be calculated from day of surgery to hospital discharge. Readmissions are considered within 30 days of discharge from the index admission.] Study Design: Purpose: Natural history;Duration: Longitudinal;Selection: Defined population;Timing: Retrospective

Dataset Information

Health-related quality of life and hospital costs following esophageal resection: a prospective cohort study.

Publications

Health-related quality of life and hospital costs following esophageal resection: a prospective cohort study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure