Study on Equity and Efficiency of Health Resources and Services Based on Key Indicators in China.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
This study aims to evaluate the dialectical relationship between equity and efficiency of health resource allocation and health service utilization in China.Methods
We analyzed the inequity of health resource allocation and health service utilization based on concentration index (CI) and Gini coefficient. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used to evaluate the inefficiency of resource allocation and service utilization. Factor Analysis (FA) was used to determine input/output indicators.Results
The CI of Health Institutions, Beds in Health Institutions, Health Professionals and Outpatient Visits were -0.116, -0.012, 0.038, and 0.111, respectively. Gini coefficient for the 31 provinces varied between 0.05 and 0.43; out of these 23 (742%) were observed to be technically efficient constituting the "best practice frontier". The other 8 (25.8%) provinces were technically inefficient.Conclusions
Health professionals and outpatient services are focused on higher income levels, while the Health Institutions and Beds in Health Institutions were concentrated on lower income levels. In China, a few provinces attained a basic balance in both equity and efficiency in terms of current health resource and service utilization, thus serving as a reference standard for other provinces.
SUBMITTER: Zhang X
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4683010 | biostudies-literature | 2015
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Study on Equity and Efficiency of Health Resources and Services Based on Key Indicators in China.
Zhang Xinyu X Zhao Lin L Cui Zhuang Z Wang Yaogang Y
PloS one 20151217 12
<h4>Background</h4>This study aims to evaluate the dialectical relationship between equity and efficiency of health resource allocation and health service utilization in China.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed the inequity of health resource allocation and health service utilization based on concentration index (CI) and Gini coefficient. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used to evaluate the inefficiency of resource allocation and service utilization. Factor Analysis (FA) was used to determine input ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundA reasonable allocation of health resources is often characterized by equity and high efficiency. This study aims to evaluate the equity and efficiency of maternal and child health (MCH) resources allocation in Hunan Province, China.MethodsData related to MCH resources and services was obtained from the Hunan maternal and child health information reporting and management system. The Gini coefficient and data envelopment analysis (DEA) were employed to evaluate the equity and efficiency of MCH resources allocation, respectively.ResultsThe MCH resources allocation in terms of demographic dimension were in a preferred equity status with the Gini values all less than 0.3, and the Gini values for each MCH resources' allocation in terms of the geographical dimension ranged from 0.1298 to 0.4256, with the highest values in the number of midwives and medical equipment (≥ CNY 10,000), which exceeds 0.4, indicating an alert of inequity. More than 40% regions in Hunan were found to be relatively inefficient with decreased return to scale in the allocation of MCH resources, indicating those inefficient regions were using more inputs than needed to obtain the current output levels.ConclusionsThe equity of MCH resources by population size is superior by geographic area and the disproportionate distribution of the number of medical equipment (≥ CNY 10,000) and midwives between different regions was the main source of inequity. Policy-makers need to consider the geographical accessibility of health resources among different regions to ensure people in different regions could get access to available health services. More than 40% of regions in Hunan were found to be inefficient, with using more health resources than needed to produce the current amount of health services. Further investigations on factors affecting the efficiency of MCH resources allocation is still needed to guide regional health plans-making and resource allocation.
| S-EPMC7158093 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo analyze the equity and efficiency of public health resource allocation in China from 2018 to 2022, and to provide a scientific basis for promoting the development of public health resources in China.MethodsData on public health resources of 31 provincial-level administrative regions in mainland China were extracted from 2018 to 2022, and descriptive analysis, Theil index, and health resource agglomeration degree (HRAD) were used to analyze the equity, and data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used to analyze the efficiency.ResultsThe Theil index of public health resource allocation by population in China ranges from 0.006 to 0.049, and the Theil index contribution rate of the number of beds, health technicians, licensed (assistant) physicians, and registered nurses within region is less than 28.76%. The Theil index of public health resource allocation by geography in China ranges from 0.274 to 0.624, and the Theil index contribution rate of the number of institutions, the number of beds, health technicians, licensed (assistant) physicians, and registered nurses within region is more than 77.05%. The HRAD of public health resources is more than 2.18 in the eastern and central regions, while the HRAD of public health resources is less than 1 in the northeastern and western regions. The overall HRAD/population agglomeration degree (PAD) is less than 1 in the northeastern and eastern regions, and greater than 1 in the central and western regions overall. The scale efficiency and overall efficiency of public health resource allocation in China are not 1, the returns to scale are decreasing, and the DEA is relatively ineffective from 2019 to 2022.ConclusionThe equity by geography is slightly worse than the equity by population, and the inequity by population mainly comes from between regions, while the inequity by geography mainly comes from within regions. There is a contradiction in the equity by population and by geography allocation in the eastern and western regions, and a congruence in the equity by population and by geography allocation in the northeastern and central regions. The DEA of public health resource allocation in China is relatively ineffective in 2019-2022.
| S-EPMC11755805 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Many developed countries use environmental public health tracking to gain a better understanding of the link between environmental hazards and public health. To respond to complicated environmental health issues, the National Institute of Environmental Health (NIEH), Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC), has begun to build a Chinese Environmental Public Health Tracking (CEPHT) system. On behalf of the CEPHT, authors provide insight into the CEPHT's development, current status, and future plans. In the initial stage of CEPHT, an indicator framework linking environment and public health that included a list of publicly available data sources regarding environmental hazards, public health outcomes, and risk factors in China was developed. An analysis of data availability, along with a comparison between CEPHT's indicator system and other tracking networks, revealed the existence of barriers and gaps in data integration that affect China's ability to track environmental public health. The lack of access to data, combined with inadequate data quality, has led to difficulties linking environmental hazards to their effects on public health. Current CEPHT efforts will help integrate environmental factors and exposure data with public health outcomes. For the near future, CEPHT plans to focus on increasing collaboration among data tracking agencies, improving data quality, and expanding proper data sharing. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4319.
| S-EPMC6785224 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundJiangsu was one of the first four pilot provinces to engage in comprehensive health care reform in China, which has been on-going for the past 5 years. This study aims to evaluate the equity, efficiency and productivity of health care resource allocation in Jiangsu Province using the most recent data, analyse the causes of deficiencies, and discuss measures to solve these problems.MethodsData were extracted from the Jiangsu Health/Family Planning Statistical Yearbook (2015-2019) and Jiangsu Statistical Yearbook (2015-2019). The Gini coefficient (G), Theil index (T) and health resource density index (HRDI) were chosen to study the fairness of health resource allocation in Jiangsu Province. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the Malmquist productivity index (MPI) were used to analyse the efficiency and productivity of this allocation.ResultsFrom 2014 to 2018, the total amount of health resources in Jiangsu Province increased. The G of primary resource allocation by population remained below 0.15, and that by geographical area was between 0.14 and 0.28; additionally, the G of health financial resources was below 0.26, and that by geographical area was above 0.39. T was consistent with the results for G and Lorenz curves. The HRDI shows that the allocated amounts of health care resources were the highest in southern Jiangsu, except for the number of health institutions. The average value of TE was above 0.93, and the DEA results were invalid for only two cities. From 2014 to 2018, the mean TFPC in Jiangsu was less than 1, and the values exceeded 1 for only five cities.ConclusionThe equity of basic medical resources was better than that of financial resources, and the equity of geographical allocation was better than that of population allocation. The overall efficiency of health care resource allocation was high; however, the total factor productivity of the whole province has declined due to technological regression. Jiangsu Province needs to further optimize the allocation and increase the utilization efficiency of health care resources.
| S-EPMC7694921 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundChina's National Essential Public Health Service (NEPHS) Program was launched in 2009 to deliver population-based public health and individual health management services to all residents at 800,000 primary health-care centers nationwide. This study assessed NEPHS utilization data and evaluated usage inequities using comprehensive nationwide data.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted, selecting 16 indicators (out of 18) from 12 service packages to evaluate inequity. These included 4 indicators for services provided to all residents and 12 for pregnant women, new mothers, children aged 0-6 years, and patients with hypertension, diabetes, severe mental disorders, or tuberculosis. Data on service utilization and target populations for these indicators across the 31 provinces and 453 cities in mainland China were obtained from the NEPHS database and management platform for the period January 1 to December 31, 2019. Service utilization rates and bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine utilization. Inequities were assessed using the Gini coefficient and Sitthiyot-Holasut composite inequality index at the national and provincial levels, and the Theil index was employed to decompose overall inequity into within-region and between-region subgroups.ResultsThe NEPHS collected health records for 88.25% of China's permanent residents (95% CI: 79.23%-98.82%). The nationwide vaccination coverage rate was 97.44% (95% CI: 91.33%-99.91%). Newborn visit and child health management rates for children aged 0-6 years were 92.08% (95% CI: 74.85%-98.34%) and 90.87% (95% CI: 82.49%-98.47%), respectively. At the national level, NEPHS service utilization in 2019 was generally equitable, with Gini coefficients below 0.4 for the 15 indicators. Potential large equity gaps were observed in the provision of health education services in Shanghai [Gini coefficient = 0.358 (95% CI: 0.219, 0.444)], Inner Mongolia [Gini coefficient = 0.370 (95% CI: 0.073, 0.440)] and Xinjiang [Gini coefficient = 0.457 (95% CI: 0.217, 0.502)]. Additionally, the utilization of family planning education and sanitation inspection services also indicated potential large and severe equity gap in 13 provinces. The Theil indices revealed that inequities primarily existed within rather than between regions. Province-level results indicated perfect equity in health record management and vaccination coverage, while several provinces showed potential equity gaps in health education and family planning services. Potential equity gaps were also observed in health management services for patients with hypertension and diabetes, particularly in Beijing, Hunan and Xinjiang.ConclusionsThis study provides evidence for health planning in China's primary health sector and guidance for analyzing equity in national health programs similar to the NEPHS Program.
| S-EPMC11874626 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10914297 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo better meet people's growing demand for medical and health services, 21 cities in Guangdong Province were involved in the reform of public hospitals in 2017. This paper evaluates the equity and efficiency of public hospitals' health resource allocation in Guangdong Province and explores ways to change the current situation.MethodsData were collected from the Guangdong Health Statistical Yearbook 2016-2020 and Guangdong Statistical Yearbook 2017-2021. The Gini coefficient (G), Theil index (T), and health resource density index (HRDI) were used to measure the equity of health resource allocation. An improved three-stage DEA method was applied in efficiency evaluation. The entropy weight method was employed to calculate the weight of different indicators to obtain a comprehensive indicator representing the overall volume of health resources in each city. A two-dimensional matrix was drawn between the HRDI of the comprehensive indicator and efficiency and the per capita government financial subsidies and efficiency to observe the coordination of equity and efficiency across regions.ResultsFrom 2016 to 2020, the G of public hospital, bed, and health technician allocation by population remained below 0.2, while that by geographical area ranged from 0.4 to 0.6; the G of government financial subsidies by population was above 0.4, while that by geographical area was greater than 0.7. The results for T showed that inequality mainly comes from intraregional differences, and the Pearl River Delta contributes most to the overall differences. Although the HRDI of the Pearl River Delta is far greater than that of other regions, obvious differences exist across cities in the region. Only 38.1% of cities were found to be efficient in 2020. The Pearl River Delta was in the first quadrant, and the other three regions were in the third quadrant, accounting for a large proportion.ConclusionThe equity of government financial subsidies allocation was the worst, and there were distinct regional differences in the geographical distribution of health resources. The development of healthcare within the Pearl River Delta was highly unbalanced. The development of healthcare was uneven between the Pearl River Delta, eastern, western, and mountainous regions. In addition, most cities in the eastern, western, and mountainous regions bore the dual pressures of relatively insufficient health resources and inefficiency.
| S-EPMC9493174 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAs the second most populous country in the world, China has a huge demand for health human resources. Over the past decade, the Chinese government has continuously increased investment in the health sector and implemented relevant policies and systems in an attempt to enhance the overall quantity and equity of health human resources. This study aims to analyze the equity and developmental trends in the allocation of health human resources in China from 2012 to 2021, providing reference and theoretical support for the government's further optimization of health human resources allocation.MethodsThis study collected health human resources data from 31 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions in China from 2012 to 2021. The methods employed included Lorenz curves, Gini coefficients, and agglomeration degree analysis, which examined the developmental trends and equity of health human resources from the perspectives of population and geographical.ResultsThis study found that over the past decade, there has been a significant increase in the total quantity of health human resources in China, accompanied by an improvement in equity, although disparities still exist. There are notable variations in the distribution of health human resources based on geographical area, with disparities between different regions. Relative shortages of health human resources are observed in western regions, while some areas in the eastern and central regions exhibit an abundance or surplus of health human resources.ConclusionOverall, health human resources in China have experienced stable development, with an incremental improvement in allocation equity, yet there remains considerable room for progress. It is imperative to continue strengthening policy guidance and regulation to facilitate the rational flow of health human resources, narrow regional disparities, and achieve the goal of universal health coverage.
| S-EPMC11460223 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The purpose of this study was to develop a core set of indicators that could be used for measuring and monitoring the performance of primary health care organizations' capacity and strategies for enhancing equity-oriented care.Indicators were constructed based on a review of the literature and a thematic analysis of interview data with patients and staff (n = 114) using procedures for qualitatively derived data. We used a modified Delphi process where the indicators were circulated to staff at the Health Centers who served as participants (n = 63) over two rounds. Indicators were considered part of a priority set of health equity indicators if they received an overall importance rating of>8.0, on a scale of 1-9, where a higher score meant more importance.Seventeen indicators make up the priority set. Items were eliminated because they were rated as low importance (<8.0) in both rounds and were either redundant or more than one participant commented that taking action on the indicator was highly unlikely. In order to achieve health care equity, performance at the organizational level is as important as assessing the performance of staff. Two of the highest rated "treatment" or processes of care indicators reflects the need for culturally safe and trauma and violence-informed care. There are four indicators that can be used to measure outcomes which can be directly attributable to equity responsive primary health care.These indicators and subsequent development of items can be used to measure equity in the domains of treatment and outcomes. These areas represent targets for higher performance in relation to equity for organizations (e.g., funding allocations to ongoing training in equity-oriented care provision) and providers (e.g., reflexive practice, skill in working with the health effects of trauma).
| S-EPMC4257722 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundMeasuring hospital efficiency is a systematic process to optimizing performance and resource allocation. The current review study has investigated the key input, process, and output indicators that are commonly used in measuring the technical efficiency of the hospital to promote the accuracy of the results.MethodsTo conduct this systematic review, the electronic resources and databases MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Ovid, Proquest, Google Scholar, and reference lists of the selected articles were used for searching articles between 2010 and 2019. After in-depth reviews based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, among 1,537 studies, 144 articles were selected for the final assessment. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Checklist was used for evaluating the quality of the articles. The main findings of studies have been extracted using content analysis.ResultsAfter the final analysis, the Context/Input indicators that were commonly considered by studies in analyzing hospital technical efficiency include different variables related to Hospital Capacity, Structure, Characteristics, Market concentration, and Costs. The Process/Throughput indicators include different variables related to Hospital Activity or services-oriented process Indicators, Hospital Quality-oriented process indicators, and Hospital Educational processes. Finally, the Output/Outcome indicators include different variables related to Hospital Activity-related output variables and Quality-related output/outcomes variables.ConclusionThis study has identified that it is necessary to mix and assess a set of input, process, and output indicators of the hospital with both quantitative and qualitative indicators for measuring the technical efficiency of hospitals comprehensively.
| S-EPMC8964142 | biostudies-literature