Non-inferiority of retrospective data collection for assessing perioperative morbidity.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background. Postoperative morbidity has immediate and delayed consequences for surgical patients, including excess risk of premature death. Capturing these data objectively and routinely in large electronic databases using tools such as the Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) would offer tremendous clinical and translational potential. However, POMS has thus far only utilised prospective data collection by research staff. We hypothesised that retrospective data collection from routinely collated hospital data from paper and electronic charts, medical and nursing notes was non-inferior to prospective data collection requiring research staff capturing POMS-defined morbidity in real-time. Methods. Morbidity was recorded by a trained investigator as defined by POMS prospectively on postopera
SUBMITTER: Patel AB
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4699777 | biostudies-literature | 2015
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA