Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To compare cost and efficacy of tubal anastomosis to in vitro fertilization (IVF) in women who desired fertility after a tubal ligation.Design
Cost-effectiveness analysis.Setting
Not applicable.Patient(s)
Not applicable.Intervention(s)
Not applicable.Main outcome measure(s)
Cost per ongoing pregnancy.Result(s)
Cost per ongoing pregnancy for women after tubal anastomosis ranged from $16,446 to $223,482 (2014 USD), whereas IVF ranged from $32,902 to $111,679 (2014 USD). Across maternal age groups <35 and 35-40, years tubal anastomosis was more cost effective than IVF for ongoing pregnancy. Sensitivity analyses validated these findings across a wide range of ongoing pregnancy probabilities as well as costs per procedure.Con
SUBMITTER: Messinger LB
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4710374 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature