Automaticity of Conceptual Magnitude.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: What is bigger, an elephant or a mouse? This question can be answered without seeing the two animals, since these objects elicit conceptual magnitude. How is an object's conceptual magnitude processed? It was suggested that conceptual magnitude is automatically processed; namely, irrelevant conceptual magnitude can affect performance when comparing physical magnitudes. The current study further examined this question and aimed to expand the understanding of automaticity of conceptual magnitude. Two different objects were presented and participants were asked to decide which object was larger on the screen (physical magnitude) or in the real world (conceptual magnitude), in separate blocks. By creating congruent (the conceptually larger object was physically larger) and incongruent (the con
SUBMITTER: Gliksman Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4754897 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA