Homogeneous case subgroups increase power in genetic association studies.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Genome-wide association studies of clinically defined cases against controls have transformed our understanding of the genetic causes of many diseases. However, there are limitations to the simple clinical definitions used in these studies, and GWAS analyses are beginning to explore more refined phenotypes in subgroups of the existing data sets. These analyses are often performed ad hoc without considering the power requirements to justify such analyses. Here we derive expressions for the relative power of such subgroup analyses and determine the genotypic relative risks (GRRs) required to achieve equivalent power to a full analysis for relevant scenarios. We show that only modest increases in GRRs may be required to offset the reduction in power from analysing fewer cases, implying that a
SUBMITTER: Traylor M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4795054 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA