Dataset Information

Vitamin D deficiency as adverse drug reaction? A cross-sectional study in Dutch geriatric outpatients.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Adverse drug reactions as well as vitamin D deficiency are issues of public health concern in older people. However, relatively little is known about the impact of drug use on vitamin D status. Our primary aim is to explore associations between drug use and vitamin D status in older people. Furthermore, prevalences of drug use and vitamin D deficiency are estimated.

Methods

In a population of 873 community-dwelling Dutch geriatric outpatients, we explored the cross-sectional relationships of polypharmacy (≥5 medications concomitantly used), severe polypharmacy (≥10 medications), and use of twenty-one specific drug groups, with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) by analysis of covariance.

Results

Overall prevalence of polypharmacy was 65 %, of severe polypharmacy 22 %. Depending on the cut-off value, prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 49 % (<50 nmol/l) or 77 % (<75 nmol/l). Of the patients using a vitamin D supplement, 17 % (<50 nmol/l) or 49 % (<75 nmol/l) were still deficient. In non-users of supplemental vitamin D, after adjustment for age and gender, negative associations were found for severe polypharmacy, metformin, sulphonamides and urea derivatives (SUDs), vitamin K antagonists, cardiac glycosides, loop diuretics, potassium-sparing diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and serotonin reuptake inhibitors; for non-selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors (NSMRIs) the association was positive. The most extreme impacts of drug use on adjusted mean 25(OH)D were -19 nmol/l for SUDs and +18 nmol/l for NSMRIs.

Conclusion

Drug use should be considered a risk factor for vitamin D deficiency amongst geriatric outpatients.

SUBMITTER: van Orten-Luiten AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4834096 | biostudies-literature | 2016 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Vitamin D deficiency as adverse drug reaction? A cross-sectional study in Dutch geriatric outpatients.

van Orten-Luiten A C B AC Janse A A Dhonukshe-Rutten R A M RA Witkamp R F RF

European journal of clinical pharmacology 20160212 5

<h4>Purpose</h4>Adverse drug reactions as well as vitamin D deficiency are issues of public health concern in older people. However, relatively little is known about the impact of drug use on vitamin D status. Our primary aim is to explore associations between drug use and vitamin D status in older people. Furthermore, prevalences of drug use and vitamin D deficiency are estimated.<h4>Methods</h4>In a population of 873 community-dwelling Dutch geriatric outpatients, we explored the cross-section ...[more]

PMID: 26873590

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAdverse drug reactions (ADRs) are important causes of morbidity and mortality in the healthcare system; however, there are no studies reporting on the magnitude and risk factors associated with ADR-related hospitalisation in Ethiopia.ObjectivesTo characterise the reaction types and the drugs implicated in admission to Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia, and to identify risk factors associated with ADR-related hospitalisation.MethodsA prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2015 to August 2016 among consenting patients aged ≥18 years consecutively admitted to medical wards taking at least one medication prior to admission. ADR-related hospitalisations were determined through expert review of medical records, laboratory tests, patient interviews and physical observation. ADR causality was assessed by the Naranjo algorithm followed by consensus review with internal medicine specialist. ADR preventability was assessed using Schumock and Thornton's criteria. Only definite and probable ADRs that provoked hospitalisation were considered. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of ADR-related hospitalisation.ResultsOf 1,001 patients, 103 (10.3%) had ADR-related admissions. Common ADRs responsible for hospitalisation were hepatotoxicity (35, 29.4%) and acute kidney injury (27, 22.7%). The drug classes most frequently implicated were antitubercular agents (45, 25.0%) followed by antivirals (22, 12.2%) and diuretics (19, 10.6%). Independent predictors of ADR-related hospitalisation were body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m2 (adjusted odd ratio [AOR] = 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-2.62; p = 0.047), pre-existing renal disease (AOR = 2.84; 95%CI = 1.38-5.85, p = 0.004), pre-existing liver disease (AOR = 2.61; 95%CI = 1.38-4.96; p = 0.003), number of comorbidities ≥4 (AOR = 2.09; 95%CI = 1.27-3.44; p = 0.004), number of drugs ≥6 (AOR = 2.02; 95%CI = 1.26-3.25; p = 0.004) and history of previous ADRs (AOR = 24.27; 95%CI = 11.29-52.17; p<0.001). Most ADRs (106, 89.1%) were preventable.ConclusionsADRs were a common cause of hospitalisation. The majority of ADRs were preventable, highlighting the need for monitoring and review of patients with lower BMI, ADR history, renal and liver diseases, multiple comorbidities and medications. ADR predictors should be integrated into clinical pathways and pharmacovigilance systems.

Project description:ObjectivesGeriatric hip fractures, known as osteoporotic fractures, are associated with nutritional deficiencies such as vitamin D (VitD). However, the relationship between other vitamins besides VitD and fracture is still lacking. Therefore, we intended to identify various vitamin levels and deficiencies in elderly patients with hip fractures and compared those with healthy elderly individuals.MethodsA total of 210 geriatric hip fracture continuous patients and 402 healthy elderly individuals aged ≥65 years old and with complete serum vitamin records were enrolled in this study. The levels of serum VitA, VitB1, VitB2, VitB3, VitB5, VitB6, VitB9, VitE, VitK1, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-HO-VitD) and nutritional markers, such as prognostic nutritional index (PNI), were compared between geriatric hip fracture patients and healthy control. The correlation between vitamin level and the nutritional markers was explored. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between vitamin levels and hip fracture.ResultsThe levels of VitA, VitB1, VitB3, VitB5, VitB9, 25-HO-VitD, 25-HO-VitD3, E, and K1 were all lower in the hip fracture group (p < 0.05). More than 80% of older persons suffered 25-HO-VitD deficiency in both healthy and fracture groups. A positive correlation between levels of VitA and nutritional markers existed in the fracture and healthy groups. In regression analysis, the association strength between standardized vitamin levels and fracture was the most significant in VitB9 (β = -0.94; 95%CI, -1.15 to -0.73; p < 0.001), VitA (β = -0.83; 95%CI, -1.04 to -0.61; p < 0.001), and VitK1 (β = -0.80; 95%CI, -1.02 to -0.58; p < 0.001), with no significant statistic difference found in VitB2, VitB9, 25-HO-VitD2, and 25-HO-VitD3.ConclusionVitamin D deficiency is common in elderly people with or without fracture. The levels of VitA, VitB9, and VitK1, instead of VitD, were much lower in fracture patients than in the healthy control, even controlling age and gender. VitA is a potential target for hip fracture prevention.

Project description:BackgroundHealth care professionals who are frequently coping with traumatic events have an increased risk of developing a posttraumatic stress disorder. Research among physicians is scarce, and obstetrician-gynecologists may have a higher risk. Work-related traumatic events and posttraumatic stress disorder among obstetricians-gynecologists and the (desired) type of support were studied.MethodsA questionnaire was emailed to all members of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, which included residents, attending, retired and non-practicing obstetricians-gynecologists. The questionnaire included questions about personal experiences and opinions concerning support after work-related events, and a validated questionnaire for posttraumatic stress disorder.ResultsThe response rate was 42.8% with 683 questionnaires eligible for analysis. 12.6% of the respondents have experienced a work-related traumatic event, of which 11.8% met the criteria for current posttraumatic stress disorder. This revealed an estimated prevalence of 1.5% obstetricians-gynecologists with current posttraumatic stress disorder. 12% reported to have a support protocol or strategy in their hospital after adverse events. The most common strategies to cope with emotional events were: to seek support from colleagues, to seek support from family or friends, to discuss the case in a complication meeting or audit and to find distraction. 82% would prefer peer-support with direct colleagues after an adverse event.ConclusionsThis survey implies that work-related events can be traumatic and subsequently can lead to posttraumatic stress disorder. There is a high prevalence rate of current posttraumatic stress disorder among obstetricians-gynecologists. Often there is no standardized support after adverse events. Most obstetrician-gynecologists prefer peer-support with direct colleagues after an adverse event. More awareness must be created during medical training and organized support must be implemented.

Project description:Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe the knowledge, attitudes and practices of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) reporting among healthcare professionals at Teaching Hospital Karapitiya (THK), a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at THK. The healthcare professionals working in THK who were available during the study period were invited to the study. A self-administered pre-tested questionnaire was administered to the participants. Respondents were evaluated for their knowledge, attitudes and practices related to ADR reporting. The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software. Results: Of the total 444 respondents, 31% were doctors and 69% were nurses. The majority of respondents, 90% (n = 400) were aware of the term ADR, while 64.8% (n = 288) could correctly define it. Among the respondents, 30.8% (n = 137) knew about the types of ADR and only 15.5% (n = 70) were able to mention a drug that is banned due to ADR correctly. Among the respondents, only 38.7% (n = 172) were aware of a formal process of reporting ADR and, only 35.3% (n = 157) stated that they had seen the ADR reporting form. Further, only 33.7% (n = 150) respondents have recognized ADR during their clinical practice and only a small proportion 18.2% (n = 81) have ever reported an ADR during their practice. Regarding attitudes toward ADR reporting, overall 84.1 (n = 373) had positive attitudes toward ADR reporting, while 13.54% (n = 60) of them stayed neutral and 2.25% (n = 10) had negative attitudes toward ADR reporting. Conclusions: Although the majority were aware of ADR , the knowledge and practices regarding spontaneous reporting of ADR are inadequate. However, most respondents have shown a positive attitude toward ADR reporting. A sincere and sustained effort should be made by concerned bodies to enhance the healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding ADR reporting.

Dataset Information

Vitamin D deficiency as adverse drug reaction? A cross-sectional study in Dutch geriatric outpatients.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Vitamin D deficiency as adverse drug reaction? A cross-sectional study in Dutch geriatric outpatients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets