Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
The World Health Organization has solicited rapid and minimally invasive techniques to facilitate scale-up of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC).Study design
Non-blinded randomized controlled field trial with 2:1 allocation ratio.Participants
75 adult male volunteers.Setting
Outpatient primary care clinic.Intervention
Open surgical circumcision under local anesthetic with suturing vs. Unicirc disposable instrument under topical anesthetic and wound sealing with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive.Primary outcome
Intraoperative duration.Secondary outcomes
Intraoperative and postoperative pain; adverse events; time to healing; patient satisfaction; cosmetic result.Results
The intraoperative time was less with the Unicirc technique (median 12 vs. 25 min, p < 0.001). Wound healing and cosmetic results were superior in the Unicirc group. Adverse events were similar in both groups.Conclusions
VMMC with Unicirc under topical anesthetic and wound sealing with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive is rapid, heals by primary intention with superior cosmetic results, and is potentially safer and more cost-effective than open surgical VMMC.Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02443792.
SUBMITTER: Shenje J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4907451 | biostudies-literature | 2016
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Shenje Justin J Millard Peter S PS
PloS one 20160614 6
<h4>Introduction</h4>The World Health Organization has solicited rapid and minimally invasive techniques to facilitate scale-up of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC).<h4>Study design</h4>Non-blinded randomized controlled field trial with 2:1 allocation ratio.<h4>Participants</h4>75 adult male volunteers.<h4>Setting</h4>Outpatient primary care clinic.<h4>Intervention</h4>Open surgical circumcision under local anesthetic with suturing vs. Unicirc disposable instrument under topical anesthe ...[more]