Dimethyl fumarate may still have a role in progressive multiple sclerosis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Plantone D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4916520 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Dimethyl fumarate may still have a role in progressive multiple sclerosis.
Plantone Domenico D De Angelis Floriana F Doshi Anisha A Chataway Jeremy J
Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders 20160406 4
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThere is limited data analyzing the safety and effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) population.ObjectiveTo analyze the safety and effectiveness of DMF in patients with PMS.MethodsWe used Cox proportional hazards models to compare the time to confirmed worsening and improvement on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) between patients treated with DMF and glatiramer acetate (GA) for at least one year.ResultsWe included 46 patients treated with DMF and 42 patients treated with GA. The safety and tolerability of GA and DMF were consistent with established profiles. There was no difference in confirmed EDSS progression. A trend towards reduced T25FW was seen in the DMF compared to GA after adjustment (HR = 0.86; 95% CI:0.37, 1.98; p = 0.72 and HR = 0.60; 95% CI:0.27, 1.34; p = 0.21, respectively).ConclusionDimethyl fumarate showed a trend towards reduction in T25FW but no evidence of clinically significant impact on EDSS. The small sample precluded definitive determination.
| S-EPMC8108088 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10663978 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To study whether dimethyl fumarate is superior to placebo in decreasing CSF concentrations of neurofilament light chain (NFL) in patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS). In the double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study dimethyl FUMArate treatment in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (FUMAPMS), patients with PPMS were randomly assigned to treatment with 240 mg dimethyl fumarate or placebo in a 1:1 ratio for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in concentration of NFL in the CSF. Secondary endpoints included other CSF biomarkers and clinical and MRI measures. Efficacy was evaluated for the full data set by multiple imputations to account for missing data. Safety was assessed for the full data set. Fifty-four patients (mean age 54.9 years [SD 6.1], median Expanded Disability Status Scale 4.0 [nterquartile range 4.0-6.0], disease duration 14.1 [SD 9.4], and 21 [39%] female) were randomized to either placebo (n = 27) or dimethyl fumarate (n = 27) therapy. At screening CSF concentrations, adjusted for age and sex, of NFL, myelin basic protein (MBP), soluble CD27, chitinase 3-like 1, and B-cell maturation antigen were higher than in a group of symptomatic controls. Twenty-six patients (96%) in the dimethyl fumarate group and 24 patients (89%) in the placebo group completed the randomized phase. Mean change in CSF concentrations of NFL did not differ between groups (mean difference 99 ng/L; 95% CI -292 to 491 ng/L). MBP in CSF decreased in the treatment group (-182 ng/L, 95% CI -323 to -41 ng/L compared with placebo). The difference observed in the multiple imputation data set was not significant in a per protocol analysis. This was nominally significant in the multiple imputation data set but not in the per protocol analysis This was not found in the per protocol analysis Other secondary and tertiary outcomes were not affected. Various infections, lymphopenia, flushing, and gastrointestinal side effects were more frequent in the dimethyl fumarate group. Serious adverse events were similar between groups. Dimethyl fumarate treatment for 48 weeks had no effect on any of the investigated efficacy measures in patients with PPMS. We did not observe adverse events not anticipated for dimethyl fumarate treatment. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02959658. This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with PPMS, dimethyl fumarate treatment has no effect on CSF NFL levels compared with placebo treatment.
| S-EPMC8407149 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo compare 2-year effectiveness and discontinuation of natalizumab (NTZ) versus fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS).MethodsPatients prescribed NTZ, FTY, or DMF at the Rocky Mountain MS Center at University of Colorado were identified. Clinician-reported data were retrospectively collected. Outcomes include a composite effectiveness measure consisting of new T2 lesion, gadolinium-enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse, individual effectiveness outcomes and discontinuation over 2 years. Logistic regression was used for data analysis on patients matched by propensity scores and using ATT doubly robust weighting estimator.ResultsA total of 451, 271, and 342 patients were evaluated on NTZ, FTY, and DMF over 2 years, respectively. Patients had a mean age of 39.8 (NTZ), 42.5(FTY), and 45.8 (DMF) years; were predominantly female (76.7% NTZ; 72.0% FTY; 69.6% DMF); and had a mean MS disease duration of 11-12 years for all groups. At ≤24 months, 22.2%, 34.7%, and 33.6% experienced a new T2 lesion, gadolinium-enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse on NTZ, FTY, and DMF, respectively. Using ATT doubly robust weighting estimator, FTY versus NTZ and DMF versus NTZ had an odds ratio of 2.00 (95%CI:[1.41-2.85], P < 0.001) and 2.38 [95% CI: 1.68-3.37], P < 0.001) respectively, for experiencing a new T2 lesion, gadolinium enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse. At ≤24 months, 32.6%, 34.3%, and 47.1% discontinued NTZ, FTY, and DMF, respectively. The majority of discontinuations were due to becoming JCV positive(12.6%) for NTZ and due to adverse events for both FTY(17%) and DMF(24.0%).InterpretationNTZ appears to be more effective and tolerable than FTY and DMF.
| S-EPMC6389745 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveIn this study, we compared the effectiveness of teriflunomide (TRF) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) on both clinical and MRI outcomes in patients followed prospectively in the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques.MethodsA total of 1,770 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) (713 on TRF and 1,057 on DMF) with an available baseline brain MRI were included in intention to treat. The 1- and 2-year postinitiation outcomes were relapses, increase of T2 lesions, increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale score, and reason for treatment discontinuation. Propensity scores (inverse probability weighting) and logistic regressions were estimated.ResultsThe confounder-adjusted proportions of patients were similar in TRF- compared to DMF-treated patients for relapses and disability progression after 1 and 2 years. However, the adjusted proportion of patients with at least one new T2 lesion after 2 years was lower in DMF compared to TRF (60.8% vs 72.2%, odds ratio [OR] 0.60, p < 0.001). Analyses of reasons for treatment withdrawal showed that lack of effectiveness was reported for 8.5% of DMF-treated patients vs 14.5% of TRF-treated patients (OR 0.54, p < 0.001), while adverse events accounted for 16% of TRF-treated patients and 21% of DMF-treated patients after 2 years (OR 1.39, p < 0.001).ConclusionsAfter 2 years of treatment, we found similar effectiveness of DMF and TRF in terms of clinical outcomes, but with better MRI-based outcomes for DMF-treated patients, resulting in a lower rate of treatment discontinuation due to lack of effectiveness.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that for patients with RRMS, TRF and DMF have similar clinical effectiveness after 2 years of treatment.
| S-EPMC6715507 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionLimited comparative effectiveness data for rituximab (RTX) versus natalizumab (NTZ), fingolimod (FTY), and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) exist.MethodsClinician-reported data on patients prescribed RTX, NTZ, FTY, or DMF for the treatment of MS at the Rocky Mountain MS Center at the University of Colorado were retrospectively collected. Outcomes included a composite effectiveness measure consisting of clinical relapse, contrast-enhancing lesions, and/or new T2 lesions, individual effectiveness outcomes, and discontinuation. Logistic regression was used on patients matched by propensity scores and using average treatment effect on treated doubly robust weighting estimator.ResultsA total of 182, 451, 271, and 342 patients initiated RTX, NTZ, FTY, and DMF and were followed for 2 years. Before and after adjustment, the odds of experiencing disease activity was significantly higher for FTY [adjusted OR (aOR) = 3.17 (95% CI: 1.81-5.55), P < 0.001].and DMF [aOR = 2.68 (95% CI:1.67-4.29), P < 0.001], and similar for NTZ [aOR = 1.36 (95% CI:0.83-2.23), P = 0.216] versus RTX. When examining months 6-24, NTZ demonstrated higher odds of disease activity compared to RTX [aOR = 2.21 (95% CI: 1.20-4.06), P = 0.007]. Similar odds of discontinuation were seen between NTZ and RTX [aOR = 1.39 (95% CI: 0.88-2.20), P = 0.157]; however, FTY [aOR = 2.02 (95% CI: 1.24-3.30), P = 0.005] and DMF [aOR = 3.27 (95% CI: 2.15-4.97), P < 0.001] had greater odds of discontinuation than RTX.InterpretationRTX demonstrated superior effectiveness and discontinuation outcomes compared to FTY and DMF. Although RTX demonstrated similar effectiveness and discontinuation compared to NTZ, RTX had superior effectiveness during months 6-24 and fewer discontinuations when excluding discontinuations due to insurance issues. Results suggest superiority of RTX in reducing disease activity and maintaining long-term treatment in a real-world MS cohort.
| S-EPMC7480919 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDimethyl fumarate (DMF) alters the phenotype of circulating immune cells and causes lymphopenia in a subpopulation of treated multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.ObjectiveTo phenotypically characterize circulating leukocytes in DMF-treated MS patients.MethodsCross-sectional observational comparisons of peripheral blood from DMF-treated MS patients (n = 17 lymphopenic and n = 24 non-lymphopenic), untreated MS patients (n = 17) and healthy controls (n = 23); immunophenotyped using flow cytometry. Longitudinal samples were analyzed for 13 DMF-treated patients.ResultsLymphopenic DMF-treated patients had significantly fewer circulating CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells, CD56(dim) natural killer (NK) cells, CD19(+) B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells when compared to controls. CXCR3(+) and CCR6(+) expression was disproportionately reduced among CD4(+) T cells, while the proportion of T-regulatory (T-reg) cells was unchanged. DMF did not affect circulating CD56(hi) NKcells, monocytes or myeloid dendritic cells. Whether lymphopenic or not, DMF-treated patients had a lower proportion of circulating central and effector memory T cells and concomitant expansion of naïve T cells compared to the controls.ConclusionsDMF shifts the immunophenotypes of circulating T cells, causing a reduction of memory cells and a relative expansion of naïve cells, regardless of the absolute lymphocyte count. This may represent one mechanism of action of the drug. Lymphopenic patients had a disproportionate loss of CD8(+) T-cells, which may affect their immunocompetence.
| S-EPMC4829494 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is one of the newer additions to the armamentarium of potent immunomodulators for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). After more than 2 years of real-world experience and more than 190,000 patients currently treated with DMF worldwide, it is a good timepoint to review the experience gathered so far and to re-evaluate the potential of this first-line oral multiple sclerosis (MS) drug. Post-hoc analyses of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, some comprising more than 6 years of drug exposure including patients from the clinical trials, and the overall notion in clinical practice widely confirm the good efficacy of DMF in RRMS. Despite an overall good safety profile, it became also clear that the necessary clinical vigilance while using DMF may not be neglected. So far, four reported cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a towering shadow over many MS therapies, warrant proper attention in newly-updated risk management plans. This review recapitulates efficacy and safety aspects of DMF therapy in relation to reported data from the pivotal clinical trials. In addition, we summarize recent insights into DMF mechanisms of action drawn from the field of basic research which may have important implications for clinical practice.
| S-EPMC4935836 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The gut microbiota is involved in the development of the immune system and can modulate the risk for immune-mediated disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Dysbiosis has been demonstrated in MS patients and its restoration by disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) is hypothesized. We aimed to study the changes in gut microbiota composition during the first 6 months of treatment with dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an oral DMT, and to identify the microorganisms associated with DMF side effects. We collected and analyzed the gut microbiota of 19 MS patients at baseline and after 1, 3, and 6 months of DMF treatment. We then cross-sectionally compared gut microbiota composition according to the presence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and flushing. Overall, the gut microbiota biodiversity showed no changes over the 6-month follow-up. At the genus level, DMF was associated with decreased Clostridium abundance after 6 months. In subjects reporting side effects, a higher abundance of Streptococcus, Haemophilus, Clostridium, Lachnospira, Blautia, Subdoligranulum, and Tenericutes and lower of Bacteroidetes, Barnesiella, Odoribacter, Akkermansia, and some Proteobacteria families were detected. Our results suggest that gut microbiota may be involved in therapeutic action and side effects of DMF, representing a potential target for improving disease course and DMT tolerability.
| S-EPMC9917003 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of dimethyl fumarate (DMF; Tecfidera, Biogen, Weston, MA) on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell subsets in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).MethodsPeripheral lymphocyte subsets, including CD4(+) and CD8(+) memory cells and T helper (TH) cells TH1, TH2, TH17, and peripheral regulatory T cell (pTreg) subpopulations were analyzed before and 6 months after onset of DMF treatment.ResultsCD4(+) and CD8(+) memory T cells were preferentially decreased compared to naive CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell populations. Within the CD4(+) memory T cell population, frequencies of TH1 cells were decreased, whereas those of TH2 cells were increased and those of TH17 cells remained unaltered. Accordingly, we observed decreased production of interferon γ, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, tumor necrosis factor α, and interleukin (IL)-22 by CD4(+) T cells under DMF treatment, whereas the frequency of IL-4- and IL-17A-producing CD4(+) T cells remained unchanged. With regard to regulatory T cells, proportions of pTreg increased following DMF treatment.ConclusionOur data demonstrate that DMF treatment of patients with MS affects predominantly memory T cells accompanied by a shift in TH cell populations, resulting in a shift toward anti-inflammatory responses. These findings indicate that monitoring of memory subsets might enhance vigilance of impaired antiviral immunity and that patients with TH1-driven disease might preferentially benefit from DMF treatment.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that DMF might preferentially reduce CD4(+) and CD8(+) memory T cells in MS.
| S-EPMC4701136 | biostudies-literature