Dataset Information

Physical activity levels in adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review.

ABSTRACT: Despite evidence that inactivity is a major factor causing ill health in people with intellectual disabilities (pwID) there are gaps in our knowledge of their physical activity (PA). To date, there is no published systematic review of their PA levels. Therefore, we performed a systematic review from January-October 2015, comprising studies from across the globe to establish PA levels, determine how they were measured, and what factors influenced PA in adults with intellectual disabilities (awID). Five databases were searched. Studies were included if written in English, peer-reviewed, had primary research data, and measured PA levels of awID. Quality was assessed using a 19-item checklist. Meta-summary of the findings was performed and a meta-analysis of factors influencing PA using multiple regression. Fifteen studies were included consisting of 3159 awID, aged 16-81 years, 54% male and 46% female. Only 9% of participants achieved minimum PA guidelines. PA levels were measured using objective and subjective methods. ID severity, living in care, gender, and age were independently significantly correlated with the number of participants achieving PA guidelines with the strongest predictor being ID severity (Beta 0.631, p < 0.001). Findings should be in the context that most of the participants were in the mild/moderate range of ID severity and none of the studies objectively measured PA in people with profound ID. To inform measurement and intervention design for improved PA, we recommend that there is an urgent need for future PA studies in awID population to include all disability severity levels. PROSPERO registration number CRD42015016675.

SUBMITTER: Dairo YM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4929079 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Physical activity levels in adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review.

Dairo Yetunde Marion YM Collett Johnny J Dawes Helen H Oskrochi G Reza GR

Preventive medicine reports 20160608

Despite evidence that inactivity is a major factor causing ill health in people with intellectual disabilities (pwID) there are gaps in our knowledge of their physical activity (PA). To date, there is no published systematic review of their PA levels. Therefore, we performed a systematic review from January-October 2015, comprising studies from across the globe to establish PA levels, determine how they were measured, and what factors influenced PA in adults with intellectual disabilities (awID) ...[more]

PMID: 27413684

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPeople with intellectual disabilities (ID) have lower levels of physical activity and quality of life and they have a lot of barriers to face when taking part in physical activity. Other problems are the poor adherence to physical activity such people have so this study is designed to improve adherence to physical activity for people with intellectual disabilities with the assistance of an application for smartphones. The aim of the study will be to improve physical activity and physical condition after multimodal intervention and to analyse the promotion of adherence to physical activity through a multimodal intervention and an app intervention (mHealth) in people with ID.MethodsA two-stage study will be conducted. In stage 1 a multimodal intervention will take place will be done with physical activity and educational advice over eight weeks, two days a week. Data will be measured after and before the intervention. In stage 2 a randomized controlled trial will be conducted. In the intervention group we will install an application to a smartphone; this application will be a reminder to do a physical activity and they have to select whether they have or haven't done a physical activity every day. This application will be installed for 18 weeks. Data will be measured after and before the application is installed in two groups. We will measure results 10 weeks later when the two groups don't have the reminder. The principal outcome used to measure the adherence to physical activity will be the International Physical Activity Questionnaire; secondary outcomes will be a fun-fitness test and self-report survey about quality of life, self-efficacy and social support. Samples will be randomized by sealed envelope in two groups, with approximately 20 subjects in each group. It's important to know that the therapist will be blinded and won't know the subjects of each group.DiscussionOffering people with ID a multimodal intervention and tool to increase the adherence to a physical activity may increase the levels of physical activity and quality of life. Such a scheme, if beneficial, could be implemented successfully within public health sense.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01915381.

Project description:Background: Adults with intellectual disabilities are a particularly inactive sub-population who experience disproportionally poorer health and social exclusion when compared with the wider general population. This systematic review aimed to identify whether community-based exercise interventions were theoretically underpinned, whether they had an active single- or multi-exercise component, and how the interventions were objectively and/or subjectively measured, as well as deducing if they improved the health of this population. Method: A systematic search of five databases was conducted up to May 2024. The study was registered in PROSPERO and followed PRISMA reporting guidelines. Study methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Risk of bias was determined using the Cochrane collaboration tools ROB 2 and ROB 2 CRT. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they recruited adults with intellectual disability, were community-based, had an active exercise component and measured physical activity (PA) levels as an outcome measure. Results: In total, 9034 records were identified, with five studies meeting the eligibility criteria. All studies used a feasibility RCT or RCT methodology and all focused on weight loss or PA levels as the primary outcome measure. Two studies focused on walking as a single exercise, two combined walking with nutrition/weight loss, and one combined walking with aerobics. One multi-component walking and aerobics intervention led to statistically significant improvements in PA. Multi-component community-based exercise interventions led to statistically significant improvements in body composition measures. No studies showed statistically significant improvements in quality of life. Risk of bias was rated moderate to high across all included studies. Conclusions: Caution should be taken in drawing firm conclusions due to the small number of included studies, small sample sizes and high risk of bias. Multi-component community-based interventions are more effective at improving PA levels in adults with intellectual disabilities than walking-only studies. Future studies should be theoretically underpinned and explore the use of peer and student models of social support. The use of fitness facilities such as leisure centres and gyms requires further exploration in this population.

Project description:IntroductionPhysical activity in the early years is necessary for setting the foundation for healthy growth and development in later childhood and adolescence. While most published evidence to date focuses on typically developing children, prevalence rates of physical activity among children with disabilities have been less studied. This protocol paper documents the plan of a systematic review, which aims to synthesise the evidence regarding physical activity levels among young children with disabilities.Methods and analysisSearches are anticipated to commence in May 2022. Empirical quantitative studies will be considered for inclusion if they present intervention or observational data on non-therapeutic (ie, leisure time) physical activity among children <5.99 years with physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments. Data sources will be retrieved via electronic database searches (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EBSCO Sports Medicine Database (SPORTDiscus), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Elsevier Bibliographic Database (Scopus), Psychological Abstracts (PsycINFO), Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC) and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE)). Additional strategies to identify relevant studies will include manual searching and citation tracking of included articles. Titles and abstracts of identified studies will be screened for inclusion, followed by full-text reviews. Three independent reviewers will conduct quality appraisal using the Downs and Black checklist. A summary of included studies will describe the study designs, participant and activity characteristics, and outcomes.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review involves a secondary analysis of previously published data; therefore, this review does not require ethical approval. The proposed paper will summarise the current evidence base on physical activity levels among young children with a diagnosed disability. The findings from this systematic review will identify gaps to be explored by future research studies and inform future investigations among the paediatric disability population.Prospero registration numberCRD42021266585.

Dataset Information

Physical activity levels in adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review.

Publications

Physical activity levels in adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets