Dataset Information

Telephone-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women With Vasomotor Symptoms: A MsFLASH Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Effective, practical, nonpharmacologic therapies are needed to treat menopause-related insomnia symptoms in primary and women's specialty care settings.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) vs menopause education control (MEC).

Design, setting, and participants

A single-site, randomized clinical trial was conducted from September 1, 2013, to August 31, 2015, in western Washington State among 106 perimenopausal or postmenopausal women aged 40 to 65 years with moderate insomnia symptoms (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] score, ≥12) and 2 or more daily hot flashes. Blinded assessments were conducted at baseline, 8, and 24 weeks postrandomization. An intent-to-treat analysis was conducted.

Interventions

Six CBT-I or MEC telephone sessions in 8 weeks. Participants submitted weekly electronic sleep diaries and received group-specific written educational materials. The CBT-I sessions included sleep restriction, stimulus control, sleep hygiene education, cognitive restructuring, and behavioral homework; MEC sessions provided information about menopause and women's health.

Main outcomes and measures

Primary outcome was scores on the ISI (score range, 0-28; scores ≥15 indicate moderate to severe insomnia). Secondary outcome was scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (score range, 0-21; higher scores indicate worse sleep quality). Additional outcomes included sleep and hot flash diary variables and hot flash interference.

Results

At 8 weeks, ISI scores had decreased 9.9 points among 53 women receiving CBT-I (mean [SD] age, 55.0 [3.5] years) and 4.7 points among 53 women receiving MEC (age, 54.7 [4.7] years), a mean between-group difference of 5.2 points (95% CI, -6.1 to -3.3; P < .001). Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores decreased 4.0 points in women receiving CBT-I and 1.4 points in women receiving MEC, a mean between-group difference of 2.7 points (95% CI, -3.9 to -1.5; P < .001). Significant group differences were sustained at 24 weeks. At 8 and 24 weeks, 33 of 47 women (70%) and 37 of 44 (84%) in the CBT-I group, respectively, had ISI scores in the no-insomnia range compared with 10 of 41 (24%) and 16 of 37 (43%) in the MEC group, respectively. The CBT-I group also had greater improvements in diary-reported sleep latency, wake time, and sleep efficiency. There were no between-group differences in frequency of daily hot flashes, but hot flash interference was significantly decreased at 8 weeks for the CBT-I group (-15.7; 95% CI, -20.4 to -11.0) compared with the MEC group (-7.1; 95% CI, -14.6 to 0.4) (P = .03), differences that were maintained at 24 weeks for the CBT-I group (-22.8; 95% CI, -28.6 to -16.9) and MEC group (-11.6; 95% CI, -19.4 to -3.8) (P = .003).

Conclusions and relevance

Telephone-based CBT-I improved sleep in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with insomnia and hot flashes. Results support further development and testing of centralized CBT-I programs for treating menopausal insomnia.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01936441.

SUBMITTER: McCurry SM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4935624 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Telephone-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women With Vasomotor Symptoms: A MsFLASH Randomized Clinical Trial.

McCurry Susan M SM Guthrie Katherine A KA Morin Charles M CM Woods Nancy F NF Landis Carol A CA Ensrud Kristine E KE Larson Joseph C JC Joffe Hadine H Cohen Lee S LS Hunt Julie R JR Newton Katherine M KM Otte Julie L JL Reed Susan D SD Sternfeld Barbara B Tinker Lesley F LF LaCroix Andrea Z AZ

JAMA internal medicine 20160701 7

<h4>Importance</h4>Effective, practical, nonpharmacologic therapies are needed to treat menopause-related insomnia symptoms in primary and women's specialty care settings.<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the efficacy of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) vs menopause education control (MEC).<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>A single-site, randomized clinical trial was conducted from September 1, 2013, to August 31, 2015, in western Washington State among 106 p ...[more]

PMID: 27213646

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOsteoarthritis-related insomnia is the most common form of comorbid insomnia among older Americans. A randomized clinical trial found that six sessions of telephone-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) improved sleep outcomes in this population. Using these data, we evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness of CBT-I from a healthcare sector perspective.MethodsThe study was based on 325 community-dwelling older adults with insomnia and osteoarthritis pain enrolled with Kaiser Permanente of Washington State. We measured quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) using the EuroQol 5-dimension scale. Arthritis-specific quality of life was measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Insomnia-specific quality of life was measured using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and nights without clinical insomnia (i.e., "insomnia-free nights"). Total healthcare costs included intervention and healthcare utilization costs.ResultsOver the 12 months after randomization, CBT-I improved ISI and WOMAC by -2.6 points (95% CI: -2.9 to -2.4) and -2.6 points (95% CI: -3.4 to -1.8), respectively. The ISI improvement translated into 89 additional insomnia-free nights (95% CI: 79 to 98) over the 12 months. CBT-I did not significantly reduce total healthcare costs (-$1072 [95% CI: -$1968 to $92]). Improvements in condition-specific measures were not reflected in QALYs gained (-0.01 [95% CI: -0.01 to 0.01]); at a willingness-to-pay of $150,000 per QALY, CBT-I resulted in a positive net monetary benefit of $369 with substantial uncertainty (95% CI: -$1737 to $2270).ConclusionCBT-I improved sleep and arthritis function without increasing costs. These findings support the consideration of telephone CBT-I for treating insomnia among older adults with comorbid OA. Our findings also suggest potential limitations of the general quality of life measures in assessing interventions designed to improve sleep and arthritis outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundPerimenopausal insomnia (PMI) has a high global incidence, which is common in middle-aged women and is more severe than nonmenopausal insomnia. Effective treatments with fewer side effects and more consistent repeatable results are needed. Acupuncture, a therapy based on traditional Chinese medicine, is safe and may be effective for PMI. It is widely accepted in Western countries, and evidence supports the use of acupuncture as a main or supplementary therapy. Cognitive behavioral therapy is also used to improve sleep quality. It has structured sessions and has been recommended as a first-line treatment for insomnia (cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia [CBT-I]) by the American Association of Physicians. However, few randomized controlled trials have been conducted to compare the effectiveness of these 2 therapies. This study will be performed in perimenopausal women with insomnia to determine the efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) versus CBT-I.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the preliminary effectiveness and safety of EA and CBT-I for PMI through a randomized controlled noninferiority study design.MethodsThis study is designed as an assessor-blinded, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. A total of 160 eligible participants with PMI will be randomly divided into 2 groups to receive either EA or CBT-I. Participants in the EA group will receive electroacupuncture for 8 weeks. The intervention will be delivered 3 times weekly for a total of 12 sessions and 2 times weekly for the next 4 weeks. Meanwhile, participants in the control group will undergo CBT-I (once a week) for 8 weeks. Treatment will use 7 main acupoints (GV20, DU24, EX-HN3, EX-HN18, EX-CA1, RN6, and RN4) and an extra 4 acupoints based on syndrome differentiation. The primary outcome is the Insomnia Severity Index. The secondary outcome measures are the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; Menopause-Specific Quality of Life; Menopause Rating Scale; Hamilton Depression Scale; Hamilton Anxiety Scale; hot flash score; and the level of estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone in serum. Sleep architecture will be assessed using polysomnograms.ResultsParticipants are currently being recruited. The first participant was enrolled in January 2023, marking the initiation of the recruitment phase. The recruitment process is expected to continue until January 2025, at which point data collection will commence.ConclusionsThis trial represents a pioneering effort to investigate the efficacy and safety of EA and CBT-I as interventions for PMI. It is noteworthy that this study is conducted solely within a single center and involves Chinese participants, which is a limitation. Nonetheless, the findings of this study are expected to contribute valuable insights for clinicians engaged in the management of PMI.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300070981; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=194561.International registered report identifier (irrid)DERR1-10.2196/51767.

Project description:IntroductionDepression increases during menopause, and subclinical depressive symptoms increase risk for major depression. Insomnia is common among postmenopausal women and increases depression-risk in this already-vulnerable population. Recent evidence supports the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTI) to treat menopausal insomnia, but it remains unclear whether treating insomnia also alleviates co-occurring depressive symptoms and depressogenic features. This trial tested whether CBTI improves depressive symptoms, maladaptive thinking, and somatic hyperarousal in postmenopausal women with insomnia; as well as whether sleep restriction therapy (SRT)-a single component of CBTI-is equally efficacious.Materials and methodsSingle-site, randomized controlled trial. 117 postmenopausal women (56.34 ± 5.41 years) with peri-or-postmenopausal onset of chronic insomnia were randomized to three treatment conditions: sleep hygiene education control (SHE), SRT, and CBTI. Blinded assessments were performed at baseline, posttreatment, and six-month follow-up.ResultsCBTI produced moderate-to-large reductions in depressive symptoms, whereas SRT produced moderate reductions but not until six months posttreatment. Treatment effects on maladaptive thinking were mixed. CBTI and SRT both produced large improvements in dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, but weaker influences on presleep cognitive arousal, rumination, and worry. Presleep somatic arousal greatly improved in the CBTI group and moderately improved in the SRT group. Improvements in depression, maladaptive thinking, and hyperarousal were linked to improved sleep. SHE produced no durable treatment effects.ConclusionsCBTI and SRT reduce depressive symptoms, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, and presleep somatic hyperarousal in postmenopausal women, with CBTI producing superior results. Despite its cognitive emphasis, cognitive arousal did not respond strongly or durably to CBTI. NAME: Behavioral Treatment of Menopausal Insomnia: Sleep and Daytime Outcomes. URL: clinicaltrials.gov.RegistrationNCT01933295.

Dataset Information

Telephone-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women With Vasomotor Symptoms: A MsFLASH Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance

Objective

Design, setting, and participants

Interventions

Main outcomes and measures

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Trial registration

Publications

Telephone-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women With Vasomotor Symptoms: A MsFLASH Randomized Clinical Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets