Dataset Information

Femoral cam deformity due to anterior capsular force: A theoretical model with MRI and cadaveric correlation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cam deformity is associated with epiphyseal extension onto the anterosuperior femoral head-neck before physeal closure. A century ago, anatomists speculated that this femoral prominence acts as a pulley bar to withstand capsular compression in hip extension with pressure concentrated where the zona orbicularis (ZO) joins the iliofemoral ligament (IFL). An animal model has shown that growth plates deflect laterally and distally when exposed to forces perpendicular to growth. These observations raise the question of whether capsular pressure against the epiphysis can stimulate cam formation.

Purpose

The purposes are to measure: (1) the distance from the ZO/IFL confluence to the maximal epiphyseal extension (MEE) and cam apex; and (2) acetabular depth at this location, since less coverage increases capsular contact on the physis.

Methods

MRI scans of 39 subjects (47 hips) were measured. Acetabular depth was compared between those with and without a cam deformity. Secondarily, anatomic findings were correlated on a cadaveric specimen.

Results

The cam apex and MEE were adjacent to the ZO/IFL confluence in all subjects (mean, 6.3 mm). Controlling for sex, acetabular depth was less (12.5%, p = 0.012) in the group with cam deformity. Contact points were confirmed in the specimen.

Conclusions

The cam apex and MEE occur at the ZO/IFL confluence in the thickest region of the anterosuperior capsule and vary with acetabular depth. This supports a theoretical model postulating that capsular forces against an immature epiphysis may induce cam formation, particularly in individuals who repetitively tension the anterior capsule.

SUBMITTER: Lee CB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4936501 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Femoral cam deformity due to anterior capsular force: A theoretical model with MRI and cadaveric correlation.

Lee Cara Beth CB Spencer Hillard T HT Nygaard Kirsten F KF

Journal of orthopaedics 20160705 4

<h4>Background</h4>Cam deformity is associated with epiphyseal extension onto the anterosuperior femoral head-neck before physeal closure. A century ago, anatomists speculated that this femoral prominence acts as a pulley bar to withstand capsular compression in hip extension with pressure concentrated where the zona orbicularis (ZO) joins the iliofemoral ligament (IFL). An animal model has shown that growth plates deflect laterally and distally when exposed to forces perpendicular to growth. Th ...[more]

PMID: 27418747

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn some hips with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), we observed a morphology resembling a more subtle form of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Theoretically, the morphology in these hips should differ from hips with a primary cam-type deformity.Questions/purposesWe asked if (1) head-neck offset; (2) epiphyseal angle; and (3) tilt angle differ among hips with a slip-like morphology, idiopathic cam, hips after in situ pinning of SCFE, and normal hips; and (4) what is the prevalence of a slip-like morphology among cam-type hips?MethodsWe retrospectively compared the three-dimensional anatomy of hips with a slip-like morphology (29 hips), in situ pinning for SCFE (eight hips), idiopathic cam deformity (171 hips), and 30 normal hips using radial MRI arthrography. Normal hips were derived from 17 asymptomatic volunteers. All other hips were recruited from a series of 277 hips (243 patients) seen at a specialized academic hip center between 2006 and 2010. Forty-one hips with isolated pincer deformity were excluded. Thirty-six of 236 hips had a known cause of cam impingement (secondary cam), including eight hips after in situ pinning of SCFE (postslip group). The 200 hips with a primary cam were separated in hips with a slip-like morphology (combination of positive fovea sign [if the neck axis did not intersect with the fovea capitis] and a tilt angle [between the neck axis and perpendicular to the basis of the epiphysis] exceeding 4°) and hips with an idiopathic cam. We evaluated offset ratio, epiphyseal angle (angle between the neck axis and line connecting the center of the femoral head and the point where the physis meets the articular surface), and tilt angle circumferentially around the femoral head-neck axis. Prevalence of slip-like morphology was determined based on the total of 236 hips with cam deformities.ResultsOffset ratio was decreased anterosuperiorly in idiopathic cam, slip-like, and postslip (eg, 1 o'clock position with a mean offset ranging from 0.00 to 0.14; p < 0.001 for all groups) compared with normal hips (0.25 ± 0.06 [95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.37]) and increased posteroinferiorly in slip-like (eg, 8 o'clock position, 0.5 ± 0.09 [0.32-0.68]; p < 0.001) and postslip groups (0.55 ± 0.12 [0.32-0.78]; p < 0.001) and did not differ in idiopathic cam (0.32 ± 0.09 [0.15-0.49]; p = 0.323) compared with normal (0.31 ± 0.07 [0.18-0.44]) groups. Epiphyseal angle was increased anterosuperiorly in the slip-like (eg, 1 o'clock position, 70° ± 9° [51°-88°]; p < 0.001) and postslip groups (75° ± 13° [49°-100°]; p = 0.008) and decreased in idiopathic cam (50° ± 8° [35°-65°]; p < 0.001) compared with normal hips (58° ± 8° [43°-74°]). Posteroinferiorly, epiphyseal angle was decreased in slip-like (eg, 8 o'clock position, 54° ± 10° [34°-74°]; p < 0.001) and postslip (44° ± 11° [23°-65°]; p < 0.001) groups and did not differ in idiopathic cam (76° ± 8° [61°-91°]; p = 0.099) compared with normal (73° ± 7° [59°-88°]) groups. Tilt angle increased in slip-like (eg, 2/8 o'clock position, 14° ± 8° [-1° to 30°]; p < 0.001) and postslip hips (29° ± 10° [9°-48°]; p < 0.001) and decreased in hips with idiopathic cam (-7° ± 5° [-17° to 4°]; p < 0.001) compared with normal (-1° ± 5° [-10° to 8°]) hips. The prevalence of a slip-like morphology was 12%.ConclusionsThe slip-like morphology is the second most frequent pathomorphology in hips with primary cam deformity. MRI arthrography of the hip allows identifying a slip-like morphology, which resembles hips after in situ pinning of SCFE and distinctly differs from hips with idiopathic cam. These results support previous studies reporting that SCFE might be a risk factor for cam-type FAI.

Dataset Information

Femoral cam deformity due to anterior capsular force: A theoretical model with MRI and cadaveric correlation.

Background

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Femoral cam deformity due to anterior capsular force: A theoretical model with MRI and cadaveric correlation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets