Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The continual reassessment method (CRM) requires an underlying model of the dose-toxicity relationship ("prior skeleton") and there is limited guidance of what this should be when little is known about this association. In this manuscript the impact of applying the CRM with different prior skeleton approaches and the 3 + 3 method are compared in terms of ability to determine the true maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and number of patients allocated to sub-optimal and toxic doses.Methods
Post-hoc dose-escalation analyses on real-life clinical trial data on an early oncology compound (AZD3514), using the 3 + 3 method and CRM using six different prior skeleton approaches.Results
All methods correctly identified the true MTD. The 3 + 3 method allocated six patien
SUBMITTER: James GD
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5007718 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature