Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
About 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30% in contrast to 90% for local disease. This has prompted search for early detection biomarkers. For initial testing, specimens taken months or years before ovarian cancer diagnosis are the best source of information to evaluate early detection biomarkers. Here we evaluate the most promising ovarian cancer screening biomarkers in prospectively collected samples from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study.Experimental design
We measured CA125, HE4, CA72.4, and CA15.3 in 810 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,939 controls. We calculated the sensitivity at 95% and 98% specificity as well as area under the receiver operator curve (C-statistic) for each marker individually and in combination. In addition, we evaluated marker performance by stage at diagnosis and time between blood draw and diagnosis.Results
We observed the best discrimination between cases and controls within 6 months of diagnosis for CA125 (C-statistic = 0.92), then HE4 (0.84), CA72.4 (0.77), and CA15.3 (0.73). Marker performance declined with longer time between blood draw and diagnosis and for earlier staged disease. However, assessment of discriminatory ability at early stage was limited by small numbers. Combinations of markers performed modestly, but significantly better than any single marker.Conclusions
CA125 remains the single best marker for the early detection of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, but can be slightly improved by combining with other markers. Identifying novel markers for ovarian cancer will require studies including larger numbers of early-stage cases. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4664-75. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Skates, p. 4542.
SUBMITTER: Terry KL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5026545 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Terry Kathryn L KL Schock Helena H Fortner Renée T RT Hüsing Anika A Fichorova Raina N RN Yamamoto Hidemi S HS Vitonis Allison F AF Johnson Theron T Overvad Kim K Tjønneland Anne A Boutron-Ruault Marie-Christine MC Mesrine Sylvie S Severi Gianluca G Dossus Laure L Rinaldi Sabina S Boeing Heiner H Benetou Vassiliki V Lagiou Pagona P Trichopoulou Antonia A Krogh Vittorio V Kuhn Elisabetta E Panico Salvatore S Bueno-de-Mesquita H Bas HB Onland-Moret N Charlotte NC Peeters Petra H PH Gram Inger Torhild IT Weiderpass Elisabete E Duell Eric J EJ Sanchez Maria-Jose MJ Ardanaz Eva E Etxezarreta Nerea N Navarro Carmen C Idahl Annika A Lundin Eva E Jirström Karin K Manjer Jonas J Wareham Nicholas J NJ Khaw Kay-Tee KT Byrne Karl Smith KS Travis Ruth C RC Gunter Marc J MJ Merritt Melissa A MA Riboli Elio E Cramer Daniel W DW Kaaks Rudolf R
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 20160408 18
<h4>Purpose</h4>About 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30% in contrast to 90% for local disease. This has prompted search for early detection biomarkers. For initial testing, specimens taken months or years before ovarian cancer diagnosis are the best source of information to evaluate early detection biomarkers. Here we evaluate the most promising ovarian cancer screening biomarkers in prospectively collected samples from the European Prospect ...[more]