The dimensional nature of eating pathology: Evidence from a direct comparison of categorical, dimensional, and hybrid models.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Eating disorders are conceptualized as categorical rather than dimensional in the current major diagnostic system (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Association, 2013) and in many previous studies. However, previous research has not critically evaluated this assumption or tested hybrid models (e.g., modeling latent variables with both dimensional and categorical features). Accordingly, the current study directly compared categorical, dimensional, and hybrid models for eating pathology in a large, population-based sample. Participants included 3,032 female and male twins (ages 9-30 years) from the Michigan State University Twin Registry. The Minnesota Eating Behaviors Survey was used to assess disordered eating symptoms including body dissa
SUBMITTER: Luo X
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5050027 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA