Dataset Information

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Plus ¹³¹I-Labelled Metuximab versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Alone in Intermediate/Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus ¹³¹I-labelled metuximab with TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database with published date from the earliest to February 29th, 2016. No language restrictions were applied, but only prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-RCTs were eligible for a full-text review. The primary outcome was the overall survival (OS) and effective rate (the rate of partial atrophy or complete clearance of the tumor lesion). The odds ratios (ORs) were combined using either the fixed-effects model or random-effects model.

Results

Eight trials (3 RCTs and 5 non-RCTs) were included, involving a total of 1121 patients. Patients receiving combined therapy of TACE plus ¹³¹I-labelled metuximab showed significant improvement in effective rate {OR = 4.00, (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.40-6.66), p < 0.001}, 1-year OS (OR = 2.03 [95% CI: 1.55-2.67], p < 0.001) and 2-year OS (OR = 2.57 [95% CI: 1.41-4.66], p = 0.002].

Conclusion

TACE plus ¹³¹I-labelled metuximab is more beneficial for treating advanced HCCs than TACE alone in terms of tumor response and OS. Large, multi-center, and blinded randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.

SUBMITTER: Zhu ZX

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5102916 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Nov-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Plus <sup>131</sup>I-Labelled Metuximab versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Alone in Intermediate/Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zhu Ze-Xin ZX Liao Ming-Heng MH Wang Xiao-Xue XX Huang Ji-Wei JW

Korean journal of radiology 20161031 6

<h4>Objective</h4>The aim of the study was to compare transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus <sup>131</sup>I-labelled metuximab with TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database with published date from the earliest to February 29th, 2016. No language restrictions we ...[more]

PMID: 27833404

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer worldwide and prognosis for patients with the disease remains poor. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and are only eligible for palliative therapy. As a novel vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR2-TKI), apatinib has a certain antitumor effect for a variety of solid tumors. In clinical practice, clinicians have attempted to treat intermediate- to advanced-stage HCC patients with a combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and apatinib. However, a consensus on the therapeutic effects of this treatment is yet to be reached. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the therapeutic efficacy and clinical safety of the combination therapy of TACE plus apatinib with that of TACE alone in patients with intermediate- to advanced-stage HCC.MethodsRelevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP) and the reference lists of retrieved articles up to July 31, 2019. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to express the therapeutic effects of TACE plus apatinib versus TACE on survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, progressive disease rate and adverse events using a mixed-effect model. Subgroup analyses of study type, dosage of apatinib, TACE regimen, study sample size between treatment groups and control groups were performed. Publication bias was assessed using fail-safe N, Begg-Mazumdar test and Egger's test.ResultsFrom 23 eligible studies, a total of 1,342 patients were included in this review and meta-analysis. Among these studies, 18 were randomized clinical trials and 5 were case-control studies. Compared with those being treated with TACE alone, patients receiving TACE plus apatinib showed significantly better half-year survival (OR, 2.741, 95% CI, 1.745-4.306) and 1-year survival (OR, 2.284, 95% CI, 1.442-3.620). The superiority of TACE and apatinib over TACE monotherapy was evident in the disease control rate (OR, 2.919, 95% CI, 2.184-3.903), objective response rate (OR, 2.683, 95% CI, 2.099-3.429) and progressive disease rate (OR, 0.341, 95% CI, 0.255-0.456), respectively.ConclusionsThe combination treatment of apatinib and TACE provides better survival benefits for intermediate- to advanced-stage HCC patients when compared to TACE monotherapy and should be recommended for suitable patients with unresectable HCC. However, further investigation into future prospective clinical studies is warranted.

Dataset Information

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Plus ¹³¹I-Labelled Metuximab versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Alone in Intermediate/Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Plus <sup>131</sup>I-Labelled Metuximab versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Alone in Intermediate/Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Dataset Information

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Plus 131I-Labelled Metuximab versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Alone in Intermediate/Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Plus <sup>131</sup>I-Labelled Metuximab versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Alone in Intermediate/Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Plus ¹³¹I-Labelled Metuximab versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Alone in Intermediate/Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.