Project description:ObjectiveFor degenerative mitral disease, repair is superior to replacement; however, the best operative strategy for rheumatic mitral disease remains unclear. We evaluated the association between decision-making in choosing repair versus replacement and outcomes across 2 decades of rheumatic mitral surgery.MethodsPatients undergoing isolated, first-time rheumatic mitral surgery were identified. Era 1 (1997-2008) and Era 2 (2009-2018) were distinguished by intraoperative assessment of anterior leaflet mobility/calcification (Era 2) in deciding between mitral repair versus replacement. Primary outcome was a composite of death, reoperation, and severe valve dysfunction.ResultsAmong 180 patients, age was 59 ± 14 years, and ejection fraction was 58% ± 10%. A higher proportion in Era 1 (n = 56) compared with Era 2 (n = 124) had preoperative atrial fibrillation (68% vs 46%; P = .006); the groups were otherwise similar. Primary indication was mitral stenosis in 69% (124 out of 180; pure = 35, mixed = 89) and did not differ by era (P = .67). During Era 1, 70% (39 out of 56) underwent repair, compared with 33% (41 out of 124) during Era 2 (P < .001). Freedom from death, reoperation, or severe valve dysfunction at 5 years was higher in Era 2 (72% ± 9%) than Era 1 (54% ± 13%; P = .04). Five-year survival was higher in Era 2 than Era 1, but did not differ between repair versus replacement. Five-year cumulative incidence of reoperation with death as a competing risk did not differ by era, but was higher after repair than replacement.ConclusionsCareful assessment of anterior leaflet mobility/calcification to determine mitral repair or replacement was associated with improved outcomes. This decision-making strategy may alter the threshold for rheumatic mitral replacement in the current valve-in-valve era.
Project description:The surgical management of rheumatic mitral valve disease remains a challenge for cardiac surgeons. Durability of mitral valve repair (MVr) is likely compromised not simply due to high technical demand, but surgeon reluctance, despite boasting copious advantages over MV replacement. This comprehensive review aims to evoke a deeper understanding of MVr concepts necessary to abate these limitations and shift mindset towards a more holistic approach to repair. Details of commonly utilized techniques in contemporary MVr for rheumatic heart disease will be discussed. Of importance, the reparative procedures will be mapped to an in-depth physiological exploration of the mitral complex-dynamism and rheumatic interplay. This is further emphasized by outlining the current "aggressive" resection strategy in contemporary rheumatic MVr.
Project description:BackgroundRheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS) is a common valvular heart disease in developing countries. We sought to evaluate the early experience of patients with RMS undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR).MethodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 5 RMS patients accepted TMVR. All patients underwent computed tomography and echocardiography before having the procedure. After the preprocedural comprehensive evaluations, the surgeons planned to use the Prizvalve (a novel balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve system which is now under the clinical registration study) for TMVR. Clinical data were collected at baseline, before discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up.ResultsThe median age of the 5 RMS patients was 61 years (range 60-77 years); 60% were male, and the median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 13.3% (range 6.2-17.1%). TMVR was successful in all patients. Postoperative transesophageal echocardiography showed that 60.0% (n = 3) of the patients had no paravalvular leakage and 40.0% (n = 2) had trace paravalvular leakage. The median postoperative peak velocity decreased to 1.4 m/s (range 1.1-1.7 m/s), and the median pressure gradient decreased to 3 mmHg (range 2-3 mmHg). No deaths occurred at the 30-day follow-up, and all patients had an improvement of ≥1 on the New York Heart Association functional rating.ConclusionsOur early experience with TMVR in RMS patients suggests that it is a safe and feasible procedure. The early results of the procedure are acceptable and provide bright prospects and directions for the precision treatment of RMS.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT02917980).
Project description:ObjectiveTo further the understanding of the factors influencing outcome following rheumatic heart disease (RHD) related mitral valve surgery, which globally remains an important cause of heart disease and a particular problem in Indigenous Australians.MethodsThe Australian Cardiac Surgery Database was utilised to assess outcomes following mitral valve repair and replacement for RHD and non-RHD valve disease. The association with aetiology, demographics, comorbidities, preoperative status and operative procedure was evaluated.ResultsMitral valve repairs and replacements undertaken in Australia were analysed from 119 and 1078 RHD surgical procedures and 3279 and 2400 non-RHD procedures, respectively. RHD mitral valve repair, compared with replacement, resulted in a slightly shorter hospital stay and more reoperation for valve dysfunction, but no difference in 30-day survival. In unadjusted survival analysis to 5 years, RHD mitral valve repair and replacement were no different (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.7), non-RHD repair was superior to replacement (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0), RHD and non-RHD repair were no different (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.7), and RHD replacement was superior to non-RHD (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.9). None of these differences persisted in adjusted analyses and there was no difference in long-term survival for Indigenous Australians.ConclusionIn this large prospective cohort study we have demonstrated that adjusted long-term survival following RHD mitral valve repair surgery in Australia is no different to replacement and no different to non-RHD. Interpretation of valve surgery outcome requires careful consideration of patient factors that may also influence survival.
Project description:ObjectiveRheumatic mitral valve disease is often viewed as a historic disease in North America with limited contemporary data. We hypothesized that rheumatic pathology remains common and has worse short-term outcomes and higher resource utilization compared to other mitral valve pathologies.MethodAll patients undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement (2011-2019) were extracted from a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Resource utilization metrics included inflation-adjusted hospital costs. Patients were stratified by mitral valve pathology for univariate analysis.ResultOut of the 6625 mitral valve procedures, 835 (12.6%) were from rheumatic disease, a proportion that incrementally increased over time (+0.39% per year, p = .032). Among 19 hospitals, there was high variability in number of rheumatic mitral operations (median: 22, interquartile range [IQR]: 5-80) and rate of rheumatic repairs (median: 3%, IQR: 0%-6%). Rheumatic patients were younger (62 vs. 65, p < .0001), more often female (75% vs. 43%, p < .001) and with greater burden of heart failure, multi-valve disease, and lung disease, but less coronary disease. There were no differences in operative mortality (5.2% vs. 5.0%, p = .85) or major morbidity (22.2% vs. 21.8%, p = .83). However, resource utilization was higher for rheumatic patients, including more frequent transfusions (43% vs. 39%, p = .012), longer ICU (73 vs. 64 h, p < .0001) and postoperative length of stay (8 vs. 7 days, p < .0001).ConclusionsRheumatic mitral disease accounts for a meaningful (12%) and rising percentage of mitral valve operations in the region, with high variability among hospitals. Rheumatic mitral surgery yielded similar short-term outcomes compared to nonrheumatic pathology, but required greater resource utilization.
Project description:BackgroundRheumatic mitral valve (MV) disease is the major cause of congestive cardiac failure in children and young adults, particularly in developing countries. Mitral valve repair with minimum prosthetic material is the gold standard treatment for this condition. However, MV repair for rheumatic MV disease is known to be technically demanding.Case summaryA 27-year-old woman without a history of cardiac disease presented with dyspnoea on exertion. Echocardiography revealed rheumatic severe mitral stenosis and regurgitation, with thickening of the bileaflets, doming of the anterior leaflet, shortening of the posterior leaflet, fusions of the lateral and particularly the medial commissure, and enlargement of the mitral annulus. We successfully performed robot-assisted MV repair with bicommissural release, patch augmentation of the two leaflets, and implantation of an originally sized partial band.DiscussionRobotic MV repair can contribute to precise valve inspection and operative procedures. This approach seems feasible for complex rheumatic MV disease particularly in young patients.
Project description:Rheumatic mitral stenosis associated with left atrial myxoma has been reported previously. We reported an admitted rare case of rheumatic mitral regurgitation with left atrial myxoma. The discrimination between left atrial myxoma and thrombi presents a diagnostic challenge in the presence of rheumatic mitral valve disease.
Project description:The indications for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have been expanding; however, treatment protocol for patients with severe aortic stenosis with other significant valve disease is still controversial. Furthermore, there are few randomized data to guide therapy in multivalvular disease. We describe a successful percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy and TAVR simultaneously. A 3-year follow-up echocardiography showed preserved valve function.Learning objectiveA combination of percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy and transcatheter aortic valve replacement for multivalvular disease with severe mitral stenosis and aortic stenosis may be a treatment option. For multivalvular disease, heart team decisions can be valuable for an optimal management strategy.