Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
We determined whether various assessment tools detect neglect differently by administering a battery of assessments to people with stroke.Method
We conducted a case series study and administered five neglect assessments (paper-and-pencil, functional, virtual reality) to participants poststroke.Results
Twelve participants (6 men, 6 women) with stroke completed the assessment battery, which required approximately 2 hr to administer (over one to two sessions). All participants demonstrated neglect on three or more assessments. Functional assessments and the virtual reality assessment detected neglect more frequently than the paper-and-pencil assessments. Participants performed differently on the paper-and-pencil assessments and functional assessments.Conclusion
Because neglect is complex, detection may depend largely on the assessment administered.
SUBMITTER: Grattan ES
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5397095 | biostudies-literature | 2017 May/Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Grattan Emily S ES Woodbury Michelle L ML
The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 20170501 3
<h4>Objective</h4>We determined whether various assessment tools detect neglect differently by administering a battery of assessments to people with stroke.<h4>Method</h4>We conducted a case series study and administered five neglect assessments (paper-and-pencil, functional, virtual reality) to participants poststroke.<h4>Results</h4>Twelve participants (6 men, 6 women) with stroke completed the assessment battery, which required approximately 2 hr to administer (over one to two sessions). All ...[more]