Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A systemic review and an updated meta-analysis: minimally invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

ABSTRACT: The feasible of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains controversial when compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to summarise the available evidence to compare MIPD vs OPD. We systemically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for studies published through February 2016. The primary endpoint was postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF, grade B/C). A total of 27 studies involving 14,231 patients (2,377 MIPD and 11,854 OPD) were included. MIPD was associated with longer operative times (P?

SUBMITTER: Zhao Z 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5440387 | biostudies-literature | 2017 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Json Xml
altmetric image

Publications

A systemic review and an updated meta-analysis: minimally invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Zhao Zhanwei Z   Yin Zifang Z   Hang Zhenning Z   Ji Gang G   Feng Quanxin Q   Zhao Qingchuan Q  

Scientific reports 20170522 1

The feasible of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains controversial when compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to summarise the available evidence to compare MIPD vs OPD. We systemically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for studies published through February 2016. The primary endpoint was postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF, grade B/C). A total of 27 studies involving 14,231 patients (2,377 MIPD and 11,  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

Unknown Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
| S-EPMC8184540 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
| S-EPMC5701376 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
| S-EPMC4132100 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis.
| S-EPMC5506213 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Survival After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
| S-EPMC7396529 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
| S-EPMC7290695 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Efficacy of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis.
| S-EPMC6883181 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Postoperative short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
| S-EPMC7262946 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.
| S-EPMC4989430 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
| S-EPMC5574616 | biostudies-literature