Concordance between Research Sequencing and Clinical Pharmacogenetic Genotyping in the eMERGE-PGx Study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: There has been extensive debate about both the necessity of orthogonal confirmation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) results in Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-approved laboratories and return of research NGS results to participants enrolled in research studies. In eMERGE-PGx, subjects underwent research NGS using PGRNseq and orthogonal targeted genotyping in clinical laboratories, which prompted a comparison of genotyping results between platforms. Concordance (percentage agreement) was reported for 4077 samples tested across nine combinations of research and clinical laboratories. Retesting was possible on a subset of 1792 samples, and local laboratory directors determined sources of genotype discrepancy. Research NGS and orthogonal clinical genotyping had an overall per sa
SUBMITTER: Rasmussen-Torvik LJ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5500823 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA