Design and Validity of Randomized Controlled Dental Restorative Trials.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background: The evidence stemming from trials on restorative materials is shaped not only by trial findings, but also trial design and validity. We aimed to evaluate both aspects in randomized controlled dental restorative trials published from 2005-2015. Methods: Using systematic review methodology, we retrieved trials comparing restorative or adhesive dental materials. Two authors independently assessed design, risk of bias, registration status, and findings of trials. Descriptive and regression analyses were performed. Results: 114 studies on 15,321 restorations placed mainly in permanent teeth of 5232 patients were included. Per trial, the median number of patients was 37 (25th/75th percentiles: 30/51). Follow-up was 24 (20/48) months. Seventeen percent of trials reported on sample siz
SUBMITTER: Gostemeyer G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5503090 | biostudies-literature | 2016 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA