Dataset Information

Evidence base and practice variation in acute care processes for knee and hip arthroplasty surgeries.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Lack of evidence contributes to unnecessary variation in treatment costs and outcomes. This study aimed to identify from interventions historically used for total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA, THA): i) if routine use is supported by high-level evidence; ii) whether surgeon use aligns with the evidence.

Methods

Part 1: Systematic search of electronic library databases for systematic reviews and practice guidelines concerning seven acute-care interventions. Intervention-specific recommendations concerning routine use were extracted by assessors. Part 2: Prospective medical record audit of the acute-care received by 1900 patients involving 120 orthopaedic surgeons. Surgeon use per intervention was summarized using caterpillar plots. Surgeon-specific routine and non-routine use was defined as use in ≥ 90% and ≤ 10% of patients, respectively. Primary analysis included only surgeons contributing ≥ 10 patients.

Results

Continuous passive motion (TKA): Routine use not recommended; 85.7% of surgeons did not use it routinely. Tranexamic Acid: Routine use recommended; 26.9% of surgeons used it routinely. Cryotherapy: Routine use not recommended; 45.7% of surgeons used it routinely for TKA; 31.8% used it routinely for THA. Intra-articular drainage: Routine use not recommended for TKA, but possible benefits for THA; 5.7% of surgeons used it routinely for TKA, 0.0% used it routinely for THA. Antibiotic loaded bone cement: Routine use for TKA not supported, recommendations for use for THA are inconsistent; 90.0% of surgeons used it routinely for TKA, 100.0% used it routinely for THA. Patella resurfacing (TKA): No recommendation could be made; 57.1% of surgeons routinely resurfaced the patella. Indwelling urinary catheterisation: Routine use recommended; 59.6% of surgeons used it routinely.

Conclusion

Recommendations for routine use or not exist for some of the acute-care interventions examined. Surgeon practices vary widely even in the presence of high-level recommendations. It is unclear whether further evidence alone would lessen unwarranted practice variation.

SUBMITTER: Mayer M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5516983 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evidence base and practice variation in acute care processes for knee and hip arthroplasty surgeries.

Mayer Marcel M Naylor Justine J Harris Ian I Badge Helen H Adie Sam S Mills Kathryn K Descallar Joseph J

PloS one 20170719 7

<h4>Background</h4>Lack of evidence contributes to unnecessary variation in treatment costs and outcomes. This study aimed to identify from interventions historically used for total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA, THA): i) if routine use is supported by high-level evidence; ii) whether surgeon use aligns with the evidence.<h4>Methods</h4>Part 1: Systematic search of electronic library databases for systematic reviews and practice guidelines concerning seven acute-care interventions. Intervention- ...[more]

PMID: 28723917

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHigh-level evidence consistently indicates that resource-intensive facility-based rehabilitation does not provide better recovery compared to home programs for uncomplicated knee or hip arthroplasty patients and, therefore, could be reserved for those most impaired. This study aimed to determine if rehabilitation setting aligns with evidence regardless of insurance status.MethodsSub-study within a national, prospective study involving 19 Australian high-volume public and private arthroplasty centres. Individuals undergoing primary arthroplasty for osteoarthritis participated. The main outcome was the proportion participating in each rehabilitation setting, obtained via chart review and participant telephone follow-up at 35 and 90 days post-surgery, categorised as 'facility-based' (inpatient rehabilitation and/or ≥ four outpatient-based sessions, including day-hospital) or 'home-based' (domiciliary, monitored or unmonitored home program only). We compared characteristics of the study cohort and rehabilitation setting by insurance status (public or private) using parametric and non-parametric tests, analysing the knee and hip cohorts separately.ResultsAfter excluding ineligible participants (bilateral surgeries, self-funded insurance, participation in a concurrent rehabilitation trial, experience of a major acute complication potentially affecting their rehabilitation pathway), 1334 eligible participants remained. Complete data were available for 1302 (97%) [Knee: n = 610, mean age 68.7 (8.5) yr., 51.1% female; Hip: n = 692, mean age 65.5 (10.4) yr., 48.9% female]; 26% (158/610) of knee and 61% (423/692) of hip participants participated predominantly in home-based programs. A greater proportion of public recipients were obese and had greater pre-operative joint impairment, but participated more commonly in home programs [(Knee: 32.9% (79/240) vs 21.4% (79/370) (P = 0.001); Hip: 71.0% (176/248) vs 55.6% (247/444) (P < 0.001)], less commonly in inpatient rehabilitation [Knee: 7.5% (18/240) vs 56.0% (207/370) P (< 0.001); Hip: 4.4% (11/248) vs 33.1% (147/444) (P < 0.001], and had fewer outpatient treatments [Knee: median (IQR) 6 (3) vs 8 (6) (P < 0.001); Hip: 6 (4) vs 8 (6) (P < 0.001)].ConclusionsFacility-based programs remain the norm for most knee and many hip arthroplasty recipients with insurance status being a major determinant of care. Development and implementation of evidence-based guidelines may help resolve the evidence-practice gap, addressing unwarranted practice variation across the insurance sectors.

Project description:ObjectivesTo assess cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathways following total hip and knee arthroplasties. Secondary objectives were to report on quality of studies and identify research gaps for future work.DesignSystematic review of cost-utility analyses.Data sourcesOvid MEDLINE, Embase, the National Health Service Economic Evaluations Database and EconLit, January 2000 to August 2019.Eligibility criteriaEnglish-language peer-reviewed cost-utility analyses of enhanced recovery pathways, or components of one, compared with usual care, in patients having total hip or knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis.Data extraction and synthesisData extracted by three reviewers with disagreements resolved by a fourth. Study quality assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list, the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and Assessment of the Validation Status of Health-Economic decision models tools; for trial-based studies the Cochrane Collaboration's tool to assess risk of bias. No quantitative synthesis was undertaken.ResultsWe identified 17 studies: five trial-based and 12 model-based studies. Two analyses evaluated entire enhanced recovery pathways and reported them to be cost-effective compared with usual care. Ten pathway components were more effective and cost-saving compared with usual care, three were cost-effective, and two were not cost-effective. We had concerns around risk of bias for all included studies, particularly regarding the short time horizon of the trials and lack of reporting of model validation.ConclusionsConsistent results supported enhanced recovery pathways as a whole, prophylactic systemic antibiotics, antibiotic-impregnated cement and conventional ventilation for infection prevention. No other interventions were subject of more than one study. We found ample scope for future cost-effectiveness studies, particularly analyses of entire recovery pathways and comparison of incremental changes within pathways. A key limitation is that standard practices have changed over the period covered by the included studies.Prospero registration numberCRD42017059473.

Project description:ImportanceThe optimal pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis agent after total hip and total knee arthroplasty is uncertain and consensus is lacking. Quantifying the risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding and evaluating comparative effectiveness and safety of the thromboprophylaxis strategies can inform care.ObjectiveTo quantify risk factors for postoperative VTE and bleeding and compare patient outcomes among pharmacological thromboprophylaxis agents used after total hip and knee arthroplasty.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study used data from a large health care claims database. Participants included patients in the United States with hip or knee arthroplasty and continuous insurance enrollment 3 months prior to and following their surgical procedure. Patients were excluded if they received anticoagulation before surgery, received no postsurgical pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, or had multiple postsurgery thromboprophylactic agents. In a propensity-matched analysis, patients receiving a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) were matched with those receiving aspirin.ExposuresAspirin, apixaban, rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, or warfarin.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was 30-day cumulative incidence of postdischarge VTE. Other outcomes included postdischarge bleeding.ResultsAmong 29 264 patients included in the final cohort, 17 040 (58.2%) were female, 27 897 (95.2%) had inpatient admissions with median (IQR) length of stay of 2 (1-2) days, 10 948 (37.4%) underwent total hip arthroplasty, 18 316 (62.6%) underwent total knee arthroplasty; and median (IQR) age was 59 (55-63) years. At 30 days, cumulative incidence of VTE was 1.19% (95% CI, 1.06%-1.32%) and cumulative incidence of bleeding was 3.43% (95% CI, 3.22%-3.64%). In the multivariate analysis, leading risk factors associated with increased VTE risk included prior VTE history (odds ratio [OR], 5.94 [95% CI, 4.29-8.24]), a hereditary hypercoagulable state (OR, 2.64 [95% CI, 1.32-5.28]), knee arthroplasty (OR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.29-2.10]), and male sex (OR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.08-1.67]). In a propensity-matched cohort of 7844 DOAC-aspirin pairs, there was no significant difference in the risk of VTE in the first 30 days after the surgical procedure (OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.82-1.59]), but postoperative bleeding was more frequent in patients receiving DOACs (OR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.13-1.62]).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of patients who underwent total hip or total knee arthroplasty, underlying patient risk factors, but not choice of aspirin or DOAC, were associated with postsurgical VTE. Postoperative bleeding rates were lower in patients prescribed aspirin. These results suggest that thromboprophylaxis strategies should be patient-centric and tailored to individual risk of thrombosis and bleeding.

Dataset Information

Evidence base and practice variation in acute care processes for knee and hip arthroplasty surgeries.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Evidence base and practice variation in acute care processes for knee and hip arthroplasty surgeries.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets