Simulation based training.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Moorthy K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC552800 | biostudies-literature | 2005 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Simulation based training.
Moorthy K K Vincent C C Darzi A A
BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 20050301 7490
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundSimulation based training (SBT) has become an important tool in medical education, yet a comprehensive review of its effect in anesthesiology is currently lacking. This study was aimed to compare the effect of SBT versus non-simulation based training (NSBT) in anesthesia education.MethodsData were derived from PubMed, Ovid (EMBASE and MEDLINE), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and China Biology Medicine (CBM) from database inception up to June 2022. We included published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the impact of Simulation-Based Training (SBT) on anesthesiology training and compared it to Non-Simulation-Based Training (NSBT).Results25 eligible studies were included, with a total sample size of 1621 medical students. SBT was associated with improved theoretical scores [mean difference (MD):5.28, 95%CI 3.06 to 7.49, P < 0.01] and skill scores (MD: 7.63, 95% CI 5.7 to 9.57, P < 0.01) in comparison with NSBT. And SBT significantly improved teaching effects, including success rate, analytic skill in clinical setting, learning interest, learn efficiency and satisfaction survey. Also, a dramatic promotion was observed in the evaluation of non-technical ability consisting of cooperative ability, problem solving ability and situational awareness after trainees with SBT.ConclusionsSimulation-based training is an effective method for improving theoretical scores, skill scores, teaching effects and non-technical ability. Yet, further good-quality RCTs are required to confirm these changes translate to improved patient outcomes. Furthermore, it is important to carefully consider the cost-benefit effect to conduct simulation-based in anesthesiology education.
| S-EPMC10412876 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Simulation-based bronchoscopy training is increasingly used, but effectiveness remains uncertain. We sought to perform a comprehensive synthesis of published work on simulation-based bronchoscopy training.We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, and Scopus for eligible articles through May 11, 2011. We included all original studies involving health professionals that evaluated, in comparison with no intervention or an alternative instructional approach, simulation-based training for flexible or rigid bronchoscopy. Study selection and data abstraction were performed independently and in duplicate. We pooled results using random effects meta-analysis.From an initial pool of 10,903 articles, we identified 17 studies evaluating simulation-based bronchoscopy training. In comparison with no intervention, simulation training was associated with large benefits on skills and behaviors (pooled effect size, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.82-1.60]; n=8 studies) and moderate benefits on time (0.62 [95% CI, 0.12-1.13]; n=7). In comparison with clinical instruction, behaviors with real patients showed nonsignificant effects favoring simulation for time (0.61 [95% CI, -1.47 to 2.69]) and process (0.33 [95% CI, -1.46 to 2.11]) outcomes (n=2 studies each), although variation in training time might account for these differences. Four studies compared alternate simulation-based training approaches. Inductive analysis to inform instructional design suggested that longer or more structured training is more effective, authentic clinical context adds value, and animal models and plastic part-task models may be superior to more costly virtual-reality simulators.Simulation-based bronchoscopy training is effective in comparison with no intervention. Comparative effectiveness studies are few.
| S-EPMC3707173 | biostudies-other
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10332686 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Ultrasound is an imaging modality that is highly operator dependent. This article reviews the challenges in learning how to perform obstetric sonography, as well as the processes necessary to acquire expert performance skills in sonography. Simulation-based education and learning, and the value of medical simulation are also discussed. Ultrasound simulators are an effective means of teaching obstetric sonography, because it provides training, deliberate practice, and performance evaluation/feedback which allows continuous and critical self-evaluation. We review evidence that simulation can improve performance in obstetric ultrasound examination, review current simulators, and discuss the current problems/gaps in ultrasound simulation. Optical positioning ultrasound simulation is a novel high-fidelity simulation learning system, which addresses many of these problems/gaps and is introduced for the first time here.
| S-EPMC10544761 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of prior exposure to simulation-based training on medical students' performance in simulation-based training in asthma exacerbation.MethodsThird-year novice medical students, who had no prior experience in simulation education and completed diagnostics and internal medicine courses, were recruited in this prospective observational study and divided into the pre-exposure and unexposed groups. Each group received a four-hour asthma exacerbation simulation-based training. The pre-exposure group was exposed to a myocardial infarction simulation training two weeks prior to the asthma simulation training. The main outcome was the performance scores in clinical skills and abilities. Performance and task checklist completion were recorded during the training. In addition, the knowledge level was tested before and after the simulation training. Students' satisfaction was evaluated using a feedback questionnaire.ResultsIn a class of 203 third-year novice medical students, 101 (49.8%) and 102 (50.2%) were assigned to the unexposed and pre-exposure groups, respectively. Scores were higher in the post-simulation test compared with the pre-simulation test. Checklist completion was greater in the pre-exposure group compared with the unexposed group (p < 0.001). Performances in communication and medical humanistic care were better in the pre-exposure group than in the unexposed group (p < 0.001). There were no differences in medical history taking, physical examination, auxiliary examination interpretation and treatment formulation between the two groups (p > 0.001). Totally 73.21% and 26.13% of students strongly agreed and agreed, respectively, that asthma exacerbation simulation-based training was necessary and valuable.ConclusionsPrior exposure to simulation training can improve performance in medical students, including communication skills, medical humanistic care and checklist completion in subsequent asthma exacerbation simulation-based training.
| S-EPMC8973632 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionEffective team leadership is linked to better teamwork, which in turn is believed to improve patient care. Simulation-based training provides a mechanism to develop effective leadership behaviors. Traditionally, healthcare curricula have included leadership as a small component of broader teamwork training, with very few examples of leadership-focused curricula. The objective of this work is to describe a novel simulation-based team leadership curriculum that easily adapts to individual learners.MethodsWe created a simulation-based team leadership training for trauma team leaders in graduate medical education. Participants included second- and third-year emergency medicine and surgery residents. Training consisted of a single, four-hour session and included facilitated discussion of trauma leadership skills, a brief didactic session integrating leadership behaviors into Advanced Trauma Life Support®, and a series of simulations and debriefing sessions. The simulations contained adaptable components that facilitated individualized learning while delivering set curricular content. A survey evaluation was administered 7-24 months following the training to assess self-reported implementation of trained material.ResultsA total of 36 residents participated in the training and 23 (64%) responded to the survey. The majority of respondents (n = 22, 96%) felt the training was a valuable component of their residency education and all respondents reported ongoing use of at least one behavior learned during the training. The most commonly cited skills for ongoing use included the pre-arrival brief (n = 21, 91%) and prioritization (n = 21, 91%).ConclusionWe delivered a leadership-focused, simulation-based training that 1) adapted to learners' individual needs, and 2) was perceived to impact practice up to 24 months post-training. More work is needed to understand the impact of this training on learner knowledge and behavior, as well as patient outcomes.
| S-EPMC6526881 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionAdvances in knowledge regarding mechanical ventilation (MV), in particular lung-protective ventilation strategies, have been shown to reduce mortality. However, the translation of these advances in knowledge into better therapeutic performance in real-life clinical settings continues to lag. High-fidelity simulation with a mannequin allows students to interact in lifelike situations; this may be a valuable addition to traditional didactic teaching. The purpose of this study is to compare computer-based and mannequin-based approaches for training residents on MV.MethodsThis prospective randomized single-blind trial involved 50 residents. All participants attended the same didactic lecture on respiratory pathophysiology and were subsequently randomized into two groups: the mannequin group (n = 25) and the computer screen-based simulator group (n = 25). One week later, each underwent a training assessment using five different scenarios of acute respiratory failure of different etiologies. Later, both groups underwent further testing of patient management, using in situ high-fidelity simulation of a patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome.ResultsBaseline knowledge was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.72). Regarding the training assessment, no significant differences were detected between the groups. In the final assessment, the scores of only the mannequin group significantly improved between the training and final session in terms of either global rating score [3.0 (2.5-4.0) vs. 2.0 (2.0-3.0), P = 0.005] or percentage of key score (82% vs. 71%, P = 0.001).ConclusionsMannequin-based simulation has the potential to improve skills in managing MV.
| S-EPMC5768222 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundInexperienced operating assistants are often tasked with the important role of handling camera navigation during laparoscopic surgery. Incorrect handling can lead to poor visualization, increased operating time, and frustration for the operating surgeon-all of which can compromise patient safety. The objectives of this trial were to examine how to train laparoscopic camera navigation and to explore the transfer of skills to the operating room.Materials and methodsA randomized, single-center superiority trial with three groups: The first group practiced simulation-based camera navigation tasks (camera group), the second group practiced performing a simulation-based cholecystectomy (procedure group), and the third group received no training (control group). Participants were surgical novices without prior laparoscopic experience. The primary outcome was assessment of camera navigation skills during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The secondary outcome was technical skills after training, using a previously developed model for testing camera navigational skills. The exploratory outcome measured participants' motivation toward the task as an operating assistant.ResultsThirty-six participants were randomized. No significant difference was found in the primary outcome between the three groups (p = 0.279). The secondary outcome showed no significant difference between the interventions groups, total time 167 s (95% CI, 118-217) and 194 s (95% CI, 152-236) for the camera group and the procedure group, respectively (p = 0.369). Both interventions groups were significantly faster than the control group, 307 s (95% CI, 202-412), p = 0.018 and p = 0.045, respectively. On the exploratory outcome, the control group for two dimensions, interest/enjoyment (p = 0.030) and perceived choice (p = 0.033), had a higher score.ConclusionsSimulation-based training improves the technical skills required for camera navigation, regardless of practicing camera navigation or the procedure itself. Transfer to the clinical setting could, however, not be demonstrated. The control group demonstrated higher interest/enjoyment and perceived choice than the camera group.
| S-EPMC5411407 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPersonal protective equipment (PPE) is effective in preventing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection. Resident knowledge of proper use and effective training methods is unknown. We hypothesise that contamination decreases and knowledge increases after a formalised PPE educational session.MethodsParticipants included first year interns during their residency orientation in June 2020. Before training, participants took a knowledge test, donned PPE, performed a simulated resuscitation, and doffed. A standardised simulation-based PPE training of the donning and doffing protocol was conducted, and the process repeated. Topical non-toxic highlighter tracing fluid was applied to manikins prior to each simulation. After doffing, areas of contamination, defined as discrete fluorescent areas on participants' body, was evaluated by ultraviolet light. Donning and doffing were video recorded and asynchronously rated by two emergency medicine (EM) physicians using a modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol. The primary outcome was PPE training effectiveness defined by contamination and adherence to CDC sequence.ResultsForty-eight residents participated: 24 internal medicine, 12 general surgery, 6 EM, 3 neurology, and 3 psychiatry. Before training, 81% of residents were contaminated after doffing; 17% were contaminated after training (P<0.001). The most common contamination area was the wrist (50% pre-training vs. 10% post-training, P<0.001). Donning sequence adherence improved (52% vs. 98%, P<0.001), as did doffing (46% vs. 85%, P<0.001). Participant knowledge improved (62%-87%, P <0.001). Participant confidence (P<0.001) and preparedness (P<0.001) regarding using PPE increased with training.ConclusionA simulation-based training improved resident knowledge and performance using PPE.
| S-EPMC9753485 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundGood medical care relies on communication as much as technical expertise, yet physicians often overestimate the efficacy of their patient communication skills. Teaching communication skills can be cost- and time-intensive, and efforts have rarely focused on challenging situations, such as conveying the news of a patient's brain death to a family member.ObjectiveWe developed a resource-sensitive simulation program to teach residents how to diagnose brain death and how to show empathy in discussing the diagnosis with the patient's family.MethodsFrom 2015 to 2017, 3 cohorts of incoming neurology residents participated in the 3-day training exercise. The 2-hour preintervention assessment involved making the diagnosis of brain death and sharing the news with an actor portraying the patient's family member. The scoring via checklists consisted of 15 clinical skills, 9 apnea test-related skills, and 37 verbal skills related to family discussion. The 5-hour didactic intervention focused on technical aspects of the brain death examination and lessons in communication with role-playing. The 2-hour postintervention assessment repeated the brain death examination and family discussion simulations. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.ResultsA total of 18 residents (100%) were assessed, with significant differences between preintervention and postintervention testing across all areas, including clinical assessment (45%-76%, P < .001), apnea testing (57%-92%, P < .001), and verbal communication (46%-73%, P < .001).ConclusionsThe findings suggest a benefit in simulation training for brain death examination, apnea testing, and the subsequent family discussion regarding the patient's diagnosis.
| S-EPMC6194878 | biostudies-literature