Dataset Information

Risk Profiles for Falls among Older Adults: New Directions for Prevention.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To address whether neighborhood factors, together with older adults' levels of health and functioning, suggest new combinations of risk factors for falls and new directions for prevention. To explore the utility of Grade-of-Membership (GoM) analysis to conduct this descriptive analysis.

Method

This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study of 884 people aged ≥65 years from Alameda County, CA, Cook County, IL, Allegheny County, PA, and Wake and Durham counties, NC. Interviews focused on neighborhood characteristics, physical and cognitive function, walking, and falls and injuries. Four risk profiles (higher order interactions of individual and neighborhood factors) were derived from GoM analysis.

Results

Profiles 1 and 2 reflect previous results showing that frail older adults are likely to fall indoors (Profile 1); healthy older adults are likely to fall outdoors (Profile 2). Profile 3 identifies the falls risk for older with mild cognitive impairment living in moderately walkable neighborhoods. Profile 4 identifies the risk found for healthy older adults living in neighborhoods with low walkability.

Discussion

Neighborhood walkability, in combination with levels of health and functioning, is associated with both indoor and outdoor falls. Descriptive results suggest possible research hypotheses and new directions for prevention, based on individual and neighborhood factors.

SUBMITTER: Satariano WA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5539824 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Risk Profiles for Falls among Older Adults: New Directions for Prevention.

Satariano William A WA Wang Constance C Kealey Melissa E ME Kurtovich Elaine E Phelan Elizabeth A EA

Frontiers in public health 20170802

<h4>Objective</h4>To address whether neighborhood factors, together with older adults' levels of health and functioning, suggest new combinations of risk factors for falls and new directions for prevention. To explore the utility of Grade-of-Membership (GoM) analysis to conduct this descriptive analysis.<h4>Method</h4>This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study of 884 people aged ≥65 years from Alameda County, CA, Cook County, IL, Allegheny County, PA, and Wake and Durham counties, NC. Intervie ...[more]

PMID: 28824893

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceEmerging evidence suggests that mild cognitive impairment, which is a precursor to Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD), places older adults at increased risk for falls. However, the risk that an older adult develops dementia after experiencing a fall is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine the risk of new ADRD diagnosis after a fall in older adults.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study examined Medicare Fee-for-Service data from 2014 to 2015, with follow-up data available for at least 1 year after the index encounter. Participants included adults aged 66 years and older who experienced a traumatic injury that resulted in an emergency department (ED) or inpatient encounter and did not have a preexisting diagnosis of dementia. Data analysis was performed from August 2023 to July 2024.ExposuresExperiencing a fall compared with other mechanisms of injury, defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 external cause of injury codes.Main outcomes and measuresThe hazard of new ADRD diagnosis within 1 year of a fall, assessed by performing a Cox multivariable competing risk model that controlled for potential confounders while accounting for the competing risk of death.ResultsThe study included 2 453 655 older adult patients who experienced a traumatic injury; 1 522 656 (62.1%) were female; 124 396 (5.1%) were Black and 2 232 102 (91.0%) were White; and the mean (SD) age was 78.1 (8.1) years. The mechanism of injury was a fall in 1 228 847 incidents (50.1%). ADRD was more frequently diagnosed within 1 year of a fall compared with other injury mechanisms (10.6% [129 910 of 1 228 847] vs 6.1% [74 799 of 1 224 808]; P < .001). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of incident dementia diagnosis after a fall was 1.63 (95% CI, 1.61-1.64; P < .001). On multivariable Cox competing risk analysis, falling was independently associated with an increased risk of dementia diagnosis among older adults (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.20-1.21]; P < .001) after controlling for patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and injury characteristics, while accounting for the competing risk of death. Among the subset of older adults without a recent skilled nursing facility admission, the HR was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.26-1.28; P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, new ADRD diagnoses were more common after falls compared with other mechanisms of injury, with 10.6% of older adults being diagnosed with ADRD in the first year after a fall. To improve the early identification of ADRD, this study's findings suggest support for the implementation of cognitive screening in older adults who experience an injurious fall that results in an ED visit or hospital admission.

Project description:IntroductionOlder adults recently discharged from hospital have greater incidence of adverse events, functional decline, falls and subsequent readmission. Providing education to hospitalised patients on how to prevent falls at home could reduce postdischarge falls. There has been limited research investigating how older adults respond to tailored falls prevention education provided at hospital discharge. The aim of this study is to evaluate how providing tailored falls prevention education to older patients at the point of, and immediately after hospital discharge in addition to usual care, affects engagement in falls prevention strategies in the 6-months postdischarge period, including their capability and motivation to engage in falls prevention strategies.Methods and analysesThis prospective observational cohort study is a process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial, using an embedded mixed-method design. Participants (n=390) who have been enrolled in the trial are over the age of 60 years, scoring greater than 7/10 on the Abbreviated Mental Test Score. Participants are being discharged from hospital rehabilitation wards in Perth, Western Australia, and followed up for 6 months postdischarge. Primary outcome measures for the process evaluation are engagement in falls prevention strategies, including exercise, home modifications and receiving assistance with activities of daily living. Secondary outcomes will measure capability, motivation and opportunity to engage in falls prevention strategies, based on the constructs of the Capability Opportunity Motivation Behaviour system. Quantitative data are collected at baseline, then at 6 months postdischarge using structured phone interviews. Qualitative data are collected from a purposive sample of the cohort, using semistructured in-depth phone interviews. Quantitative data will be analysed using regression modelling and qualitative data will be analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis.Ethics and disseminationResults will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences worldwide. This study is approved by hospital and university Human Research Ethics Committees.

Project description:IntroductionOne-third of adults aged 65+ fall annually. Injuries from falls can be devastating for individuals and account for 1.5% of annual healthcare spending. With the growing ageing population, falls place increased strain on scarce health resources. Prevention strategies that target individuals at high risk for falls demonstrate the best value for money; however, limited efficiency (ie, cost-effectiveness) information for fall prevention interventions hinders the implementation of effective falls prevention programmes. Living systematic reviews provide a timely up-to-date evidence-based resource to inform clinical guidelines and health policy decisions. This protocol details the methodology for a living systematic review of the efficiency (ie, cost-effectiveness) of fall prevention interventions for older adults in three settings: community-dwelling, aged care and hospitals.Methods and analysisThis protocol used the reporting guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol. Peer-reviewed economic evaluations of controlled clinical trials or health state models will be included. Reports will be obtained through monthly systematic searches of CENTRAL (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), SCOPUS (Elsevier) and Web of Science (Clarivate) alongside snowballing and handsearching EconLit and the Tufts Cost Effectivness Analysis Registry. Screening, data extraction, quality assessment and risk of bias will be assessed by multiple reviewers. The primary outcomes will be the incremental cost-effectiveness (ie, incremental cost per fall prevented), incremental cost-utility (ie, incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained) or cost-benefit ratio. Additional outcomes will include falls and cost-related measures. All economic outcomes will be reported in a common year and currency. Results will be reported as a narrative synthesis; meta-analysis will be considered based on data quality, suitability and availability.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required as primary human data will not be collected. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and a dedicated website.Prospero registration numberCRD42024532485.

Dataset Information

Risk Profiles for Falls among Older Adults: New Directions for Prevention.

Objective

Method

Results

Discussion

Publications

Risk Profiles for Falls among Older Adults: New Directions for Prevention.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets