Project description:ObjectiveTo assess the incremental cost and cost-effectiveness of continuous and discontinuous regimens of bevacizumab (Avastin) and ranibizumab (Lucentis) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective.DesignA within-trial cost-utility analysis with a 2-year time horizon, based on a multicentre factorial, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.Setting23 hospital ophthalmology clinics.Participants610 patients aged ≥50 years with untreated nAMD in the study eye.Interventions0.5 mg ranibizumab or 1.25 mg bevacizumab given continuously (monthly) or discontinuously (as-needed) for 2 years.Main outcome measuresQuality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).ResultsTotal 2-year costs ranged from £3002/patient ($4700; 95% CI £2601 to £3403) for discontinuous bevacizumab to £18 590/patient ($29 106; 95% CI £18 258 to £18 922) for continuous ranibizumab. Ranibizumab was significantly more costly than bevacizumab for both continuous (+£14 989/patient ($23 468); 95% CI £14 522 to £15 456; p<0.001) and discontinuous treatment (+£8498 ($13 305); 95% CI £7700 to £9295; p<0.001), with negligible difference in QALYs. Continuous ranibizumab would only be cost-effective compared with continuous bevacizumab if the NHS were willing to pay £3.5 million ($5.5 million) per additional QALY gained. Patients receiving continuous bevacizumab accrued higher total costs (+£599 ($938); 95% CI £91 to £1107; p=0.021) than those receiving discontinuous bevacizumab, but also accrued non-significantly more QALYs (+0.020; 95% CI -0.032 to 0.071; p=0.452). Continuous bevacizumab therefore cost £30 220 ($47 316) per QALY gained versus discontinuous bevacizumab. However, bootstrapping demonstrated that if the NHS is willing to pay £20 000/QALY gained, there is a 37% chance that continuous bevacizumab is cost-effective versus discontinuous bevacizumab.ConclusionsRanibizumab is not cost-effective compared with bevacizumab, being substantially more costly and producing little or no QALY gain. Discontinuous bevacizumab is likely to be the most cost-effective of the four treatment strategies evaluated in this UK trial, although there is a 37% chance that continuous bevacizumab is cost-effective.Trial registration numberISRCTN92166560.

Project description:PurposeTo describe serum vascular endothelial growth factor (sVEGF) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) receiving anti-VEGF agents and associations between sVEGF and systemic serious adverse events (SSAEs).DesignExploratory analyses of a randomized controlled trial that enrolled 610 participants with nAMD and compared 2 anti-VEGF antibodies, ranibizumab and bevacizumab, and 2 treatment regimens, monthly vs. discontinuous, with 2 years' follow-up.ParticipantsAdults aged 50+ years with treatment-naïve nAMD and a visual acuity of ≥25 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/320) in the affected eye.MethodsIntravitreal injection of anti-VEGF antibodies.Main outcome measuressVEGF and occurrence of SSAE, with particular interest in arteriothromboembolic events (ATE) and immunologically mediated events (IME).ResultsOn average, sVEGF (measured at months 0, 1, 11, 12, 23, and 24) decreased from a geometric mean of 168 pg/mL at baseline to 64 pg/mL at month 24. The decrease was greater with bevacizumab than with ranibizumab and was dependent on time since last treatment; at month 24 sVEGF was 11% lower with bevacizumab if treated ≥3 months previously, 51% lower if treated 2 months previously, and 76% lower if treated the previous month, compared with ranibizumab. The hazard of experiencing an ATE increased with age (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.32-3.05; P = 0.001) and higher sVEGF (HR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.03-1.30, per 100 unit rise in sVEGF; P = 0.013). There was no association between sVEGF and the hazard of an IME (HR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.76-1.33; P = 0.942); however, the hazard of an IME was significantly increased by treatment with bevacizumab compared with ranibizumab (HR = 3.53; 95% CI = 1.35-9.22; P = 0.010). The hazard of an "other SSAE" (not categorized as ATE or IME) increased with age (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.14-2.01, P = 0.005) and decreased if an injection had been administered within the previous month (HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.45-1.03; P = 0.069).ConclusionsThe decrease in sVEGF is greater with bevacizumab than with ranibizumab, but this difference is eliminated when treatment is withheld for 3 months. Higher sVEGF increased the hazard of an ATE and bevacizumab increases the hazard of an IME compared with ranibizumab.

Project description:PurposeTo describe visual outcomes, frequency of treatment and monitoring visits, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs used in usual care in participants who exited a trial in which treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) was initiated with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.DesignMulticenter cohort study up to 7 years after trial exit.ParticipantsPatients enrolled in the Inhibition of VEGF in Age-related choroidal Neovascularisation (IVAN) trial; after excluding participants from 2 sites and who died or withdrew during the trial, 537 were included in this follow-up cohort.MethodsData were collected between May 26, 2016, and August 24, 2017. Distance visual acuity (DVA) (letters read) in both eyes and treatments for nAMD administered to either eye at all usual care visits were extracted from medical records of all participants until the point of data collection (duration of study eye monitoring).Main outcome measuresRate of change of DVA during active surveillance of the study eye (study eye monitoring), estimated using a multivariable linear random effects model. Other outcome measures were visit and treatment frequency and switches in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug.ResultsData were obtained for 99% (532/537) of eligible participants. The median duration of study eye monitoring after IVAN exit was 3.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.3-4.7), and median DVA was 58.0 letters (IQR, 34.0-73.0). Study eye DVA deteriorated by 4.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-4.9) letters per year. Injection rate did not influence the rate of change in DVA after adjusting for key covariates. After IVAN exit, 174 participants (32%) received no treatment; 332 of 358 (93%) were treated first with ranibizumab, 78 (23%) of whom switched to aflibercept. The DVA was similar among participants who switched or did not switch at the end of study monitoring.ConclusionsApproximately 5 years after the IVAN study finished, with unprecedented completeness of follow-up for such a trial, the trajectory of functional decline in the study eye was shown to be greater than that previously reported for incomplete trial cohorts. Anti-VEGF injection rates and treatment switches were not important factors in determining visual acuity outcomes.

Dataset Information

Ivan Myer Sievers

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets