Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Recently, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the procedure of choice in high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (AS). However, its value is still debated in operable AS cases. We performed this meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of TAVR to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in low-to-moderate surgical risk patients with AS.Methods
A systematic search of five authentic databases retrieved 11 eligible studies (20,056 patients). Relevant Data were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) or standardized mean differences (SMD), with their 95% confidence interval, using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and RevMan software for windows.Results
At one-year of follow-up, the pooled effect-estimates showed no significant difference
SUBMITTER: Elmaraezy A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5571502 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature