Directionality in Aesthetic Judgments and Performance Evaluation: Sport Judges and Laypeople Compared.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Left-to-right readers are assumed to demonstrate a left-to-right bias in aesthetic preferences and performance evaluation. Here we tested the hypothesis that such bias occurs in left-to-right reading laypeople and gymnastic judges (n = 48 each) when asked to select the more beautiful image from a picture pair showing gymnastic or non-gymnastic actions (Experiment 1) and to evaluate videos of gymnasts' balance beam performances (Experiment 2). Overall, laypeople demonstrated a stronger left-to-right bias than judges. Unlike judges, laypeople rated images with left-to-right trajectory as more beautiful than content-wise identical images with right-to-left trajectory (Experiment 1). Also, laypeople tended to award slightly more points to videos showing left-to-right as opposed to right-to-lef
SUBMITTER: Loffing F
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5723409 | biostudies-literature | 2017
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA