Dataset Information

Differential Covariance: A New Class of Methods to Estimate Sparse Connectivity from Neural Recordings.

ABSTRACT: With our ability to record more neurons simultaneously, making sense of these data is a challenge. Functional connectivity is one popular way to study the relationship of multiple neural signals. Correlation-based methods are a set of currently well-used techniques for functional connectivity estimation. However, due to explaining away and unobserved common inputs (Stevenson, Rebesco, Miller, & Körding, 2008 ), they produce spurious connections. The general linear model (GLM), which models spike trains as Poisson processes (Okatan, Wilson, & Brown, 2005 ; Truccolo, Eden, Fellows, Donoghue, & Brown, 2005 ; Pillow et al., 2008 ), avoids these confounds. We develop here a new class of methods by using differential signals based on simulated intracellular voltage recordings. It is equivalent to a regularized AR(2) model. We also expand the method to simulated local field potential recordings and calcium imaging. In all of our simulated data, the differential covariance-based methods achieved performance better than or similar to the GLM method and required fewer data samples. This new class of methods provides alternative ways to analyze neural signals.

SUBMITTER: Lin TW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5726979 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Differential Covariance: A New Class of Methods to Estimate Sparse Connectivity from Neural Recordings.

Lin Tiger W TW Das Anup A Krishnan Giri P GP Bazhenov Maxim M Sejnowski Terrence J TJ

Neural computation 20170804 10

With our ability to record more neurons simultaneously, making sense of these data is a challenge. Functional connectivity is one popular way to study the relationship of multiple neural signals. Correlation-based methods are a set of currently well-used techniques for functional connectivity estimation. However, due to explaining away and unobserved common inputs (Stevenson, Rebesco, Miller, & Körding, 2008 ), they produce spurious connections. The general linear model (GLM), which models spike ...[more]

PMID: 28777719

Similar Datasets

Project description:Inferring and understanding the underlying connectivity structure of a system solely from the observed activity of its constituent components is a challenge in many areas of science. In neuroscience, techniques for estimating connectivity are paramount when attempting to understand the network structure of neural systems from their recorded activity patterns. To date, no universally accepted method exists for the inference of effective connectivity, which describes how the activity of a neural node mechanistically affects the activity of other nodes. Here, focussing on purely excitatory networks of small to intermediate size and continuous node dynamics, we provide a systematic comparison of different approaches for estimating effective connectivity. Starting with the Hopf neuron model in conjunction with known ground truth structural connectivity, we reconstruct the system's connectivity matrix using a variety of algorithms. We show that, in sparse non-linear networks with delays, combining a lagged-cross-correlation (LCC) approach with a recently published derivative-based covariance analysis method provides the most reliable estimation of the known ground truth connectivity matrix. We outline how the parameters of the Hopf model, including those controlling the bifurcation, noise, and delay distribution, affect this result. We also show that in linear networks, LCC has comparable performance to a method based on transfer entropy, at a drastically lower computational cost. We highlight that LCC works best for small sparse networks, and show how performance decreases in larger and less sparse networks. Applying the method to linear dynamics without time delays, we find that it does not outperform derivative-based methods. We comment on this finding in light of recent theoretical results for such systems. Employing the Hopf model, we then use the estimated structural connectivity matrix as the basis for a forward simulation of the system dynamics, in order to recreate the observed node activity patterns. We show that, under certain conditions, the best method, LCC, results in higher trace-to-trace correlations than derivative-based methods for sparse noise-driven systems. Finally, we apply the LCC method to empirical biological data. Choosing a suitable threshold for binarization, we reconstruct the structural connectivity of a subset of the nervous system of the nematode C. elegans. We show that the computationally simple LCC method performs better than another recently published, computationally more expensive reservoir computing-based method. We apply different methods to this dataset and find that they all lead to similar performances. Our results show that a comparatively simple method can be used to reliably estimate directed effective connectivity in sparse neural systems in the presence of spatio-temporal delays and noise. We provide concrete suggestions for the estimation of effective connectivity in a scenario common in biological research, where only neuronal activity of a small set of neurons, but not connectivity or single-neuron and synapse dynamics, are known.

Project description:BACKGROUND: Measurements of auto and cross covariance functions are frequently used to investigate neural systems. In interpreting this data, it is commonly assumed that the largest contribution to the recordings comes from sources near the electrode. However, the potential recorded at an electrode represents the superimposition of the potentials generated by large numbers of active neural structures. This creates situations under which the measured auto and cross covariance functions are dominated by the activity in structures far from the electrode and in which the distance dependence of the cross-covariance function differs significantly from that describing the activity in the actual neural structures. METHODS: Direct application of electrostatics to calculate the theoretical auto and cross covariance functions that would be recorded from electrodes immersed in a large volume filled with active neural structures with specific statistical properties. RESULTS: It is demonstrated that the potentials recorded from a monopolar electrode surrounded by dipole sources in a uniform medium are predominantly due to activity in neural structures far from the electrode when neuronal correlations drop more slowly than 1/r3 or when the size of the neural system is much smaller than a known correlation distance. Recordings from quadrupolar sources are strongly dependent on distant neurons when correlations drop more slowly than 1/r or the size of the system is much smaller than the correlation distance. Differences between bipolar and monopolar recordings are discussed. It is also demonstrated that the cross covariance of the recorded in two spatially separated electrodes declines as a power-law function of the distance between them even when the electrical activity from different neuronal structures is uncorrelated. CONCLUSION: When extracellular electrophysiologic recordings are made from systems containing large numbers of neural structures, it is important to interpret measured auto and cross covariance functions cautiously in light of the long range nature of the electric fields. Using recording electrodes that are bipolar or quadrupolar minimizes or eliminates these effects and hence these electrodes are preferred when electrical recordings are made for the purpose of auto and cross correlation analysis of local electrical activity.

Dataset Information

Differential Covariance: A New Class of Methods to Estimate Sparse Connectivity from Neural Recordings.

Publications

Differential Covariance: A New Class of Methods to Estimate Sparse Connectivity from Neural Recordings.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets