Dataset Information

Effects of different anticoagulant drugs on the prevention of complications in patients after arthroplasty: A network meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

After arthroplasty treatment, some complications commonly occur, such as early revision, infection/dislocation, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study aims to use a network meta-analysis to compare effects of 9 anticoagulant drugs (edoxaban, dabigatan, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, heparin, bemiparin, ximelagatran, and enoxaparin) in preventing postoperative complications in arthroplasty patients.

Methods

After retrieving PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database from the inception to November 2016, randomized controlled trials were enrolled. The integration of direct and indirect evidences was performed to calculate odd ratios and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves. Nineteen eligible randomized controlled trials were included.

Results

The network meta-analysis results showed that compared with warfarin, edoxaban, apixaban, and rivaroxaban had a lower incidence rate in asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis, which indicated that edoxaban, apixaban, and rivaroxaban had better effects on prevention. Similarly, in comparison to enoxaparin, edoxaban and rivaroxaban had better effect; rivaroxaban was better than ximelagatran in preventive effects. Compared with apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatan, rivaroxaban, and enoxaparin had a higher incidence rate in clinically relevant non-major bleeding, which showed that preventive effects were relatively poor. In addition, the results of the surface under the cumulative ranking curves showed that rivaroxaban and bemiparin worked best on symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. In terms of bleeding, apixaban and warfarin had better preventive effects.

Conclusion

Our findings suggested that rivaroxaban may work better in terms of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, whereas apixaban had better preventive effects in bleeding.

SUBMITTER: Gao JH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5737997 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effects of different anticoagulant drugs on the prevention of complications in patients after arthroplasty: A network meta-analysis.

Gao Ji-Hai JH Chu Xiu-Cheng XC Wang Lin-Liang LL Ning Bo B Zhao Chuan-Xin CX

Medicine 20171001 40

<h4>Background</h4>After arthroplasty treatment, some complications commonly occur, such as early revision, infection/dislocation, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study aims to use a network meta-analysis to compare effects of 9 anticoagulant drugs (edoxaban, dabigatan, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, heparin, bemiparin, ximelagatran, and enoxaparin) in preventing postoperative complications in arthroplasty patients.<h4>Methods</h4>After retrieving PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library da ...[more]

PMID: 28984761

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective: A lack of clarity persists regarding the efficacy and risks associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing dialysis, primarily due to limited retrospective studies. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the existing data and propose a practical protocol for the clinical utilization of DOACs in ESRD patients with AF undergoing dialysis. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for clinical studies evaluating DOACs in ESRD patients with AF on dialysis published up to 2 February 2023. DOACs included warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The outcomes were mortality, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, any stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and minor bleeding. Results: Compared with placebo, apixaban (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.88-1.07), rivaroxaban (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76-1.10), and warfarin (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90-1.01) did not reduce mortality. Regarding direct comparisons of mortality, the comparisons of warfarin vs. apixaban (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.92-1.06), placebo vs. warfarin (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.99-1.11), and rivaroxaban vs. warfarin (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80-1.14) did not significantly reduce mortality. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, rivaroxaban (75.53%), warfarin (62.14%), and apixaban (45.6%) were the most effective interventions for managing mortality, and placebo (16.74%) was the worst. Conclusion: In conclusion, rivaroxaban demonstrated efficacy in reducing mortality and the incidence of ischemic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. Dabigatran is recommended for the prevention of hemorrhagic stroke. However, caution should be exercised due to the risk of major bleeding. Warfarin can effectively reduce minor bleeding but does not offer significant protection against gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding. Apixaban was not recommended for mortality reduction or for preventing ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes. Further research will be necessary to establish specific clinical protocols.

Project description:ObjectiveThis study was designed to evaluate the postoperative pain effect and clinical efficacy of different drugs combined with PKP or PVP in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) through a systematic review and network meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched five electronic databases, namely, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials online, for the treatment of OVCFs through March 2023 with keywords zoledronic acid (ZOL), teriparatide (TPTD or PTH 1-34), and calcitonin (CT) combined with PKP/PVP. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were the primary outcomes of the network meta-analysis, and the secondary outcome was the diagnostic marker bone mineral density (BMD).ResultsEighteen studies involving 2,374 patients were included in this study. The network meta-analysis revealed that, in terms of reducing VAS scores, compared with PVP surgery alone, PVP combined with TPTD was most likely to be the treatment associated with the greatest pain relief [MD = -4.99, 95% CI = (-7.45, -2.52)]. In terms of reducing the ODI dysfunction score, compared with PKP combined with Cal, PKP combined with ZOL had the highest probability of being the best treatment option [MD = -9.11, 95% CI = (-14.27, -3.95)]. In terms of protecting against bone density loss, compared with PKP surgery alone, treatment with PKP combined with ZOL had the best effect [MD = 0.39, 95% CI = (0.13,0.65)].ConclusionsBased on the network meta-analysis and SUCRA rankings, this study concluded that adding teriparatide has the advantage of reducing VAS pain scores compared with PVP alone and that adding zoledronate is a more effective treatment for reducing ODI scores compared with PKP combined with Cal and preserving BMD compared with PKP alone. However, additional high-quality studies are needed to verify our findings.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=358445, identifier CRD42022358445.

Project description:BackgroundGastroprotectant drugs are used for the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and might reduce its associated complications, but reliable estimates of the effects of gastroprotectants in different clinical settings are scarce. We aimed to examine the effects of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), prostaglandin analogues, and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in different clinical circumstances by doing meta-analyses of tabular data from all relevant unconfounded randomised trials of gastroprotectant drugs.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE and Embase from Jan 1, 1950, to Dec 31, 2015, to identify unconfounded, randomised trials of a gastroprotectant drug (defined as a PPI, prostaglandin analogue, or H2RA) versus control, or versus another gastroprotectant. Two independent researchers reviewed the search results and extracted the prespecified outcomes and key characteristics for each trial. We did meta-analyses of the effects of gastroprotectant drugs on ulcer development, bleeding, and mortality overall, according to the class of gastroprotectant, and according to the individual drug within a gastroprotectant class.FindingsWe identified comparisons of gastroprotectant versus control in 849 trials (142 485 participants): 580 prevention trials (110 626 participants), 233 healing trials (24 033 participants), and 36 trials for the treatment of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (7826 participants). Comparisons of one gastroprotectant drug versus another were available in 345 trials (64 905 participants), comprising 160 prevention trials (32 959 participants), 167 healing trials (28 306 participants), and 18 trials for treatment of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (3640 participants). The median number of patients in each trial was 78 (IQR 44·0-210·5) and the median duration was 1·4 months (0·9-2·8). In prevention trials, gastroprotectant drugs reduced development of endoscopic ulcers (odds ratio [OR] 0·27, 95% CI 0·25-0·29; p<0·0001), symptomatic ulcers (0·25, 0·22-0·29; p<0·0001), and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (0·40, 0·32-0·50; p<0·0001), but did not significantly reduce mortality (0·85, 0·69-1·04; p=0·11). Larger proportional reductions in upper gastrointestinal bleeding were observed for PPIs than for other gastroprotectant drugs (PPIs 0·21, 99% CI 0·12-0·36; prostaglandin analogues 0·63, 0·35-1·12; H2RAs 0·49, 0·30-0·80; phet=0·0005). Gastroprotectant drugs were effective in preventing bleeding irrespective of the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (phet=0·56). In healing trials, gastroprotectants increased endoscopic ulcer healing (3·49, 95% CI 3·28-3·72; p<0·0001), with PPIs more effective (5·22, 99% CI 4·00-6·80) than prostaglandin analogues (2·27, 1·91-2·70) and H2RAs (3·80, 3·44-4·20; phet<0·0001). In trials among patients with acute bleeding, gastroprotectants reduced further bleeding (OR 0·68, 95% CI 0·60-0·78; p<0·0001), blood transfusion (0·75, 0·65-0·88; p=0·0003), further endoscopic intervention (0·56, 0·45-0·70; p<0·0001), and surgery (0·72, 0·61-0·84; p<0·0001), but did not significantly reduce mortality (OR 0·90, 0·72-1·11; p=0·31). PPIs had larger protective effects than did H2RAs for further bleeding (phet=0·0107) and blood transfusion (phet=0·0130).InterpretationGastroprotectants, in particular PPIs, reduce the risk of peptic ulcer disease and its complications and promote healing of peptic ulcers in a wide range of clinical circumstances. However, this meta-analysis might have overestimated the benefits owing to small study bias.FundingUK Medical Research Council and the British Heart Foundation.

Project description:BackgroundIn the past decade, there has been a significant advancement in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, leading to the discovery of new drugs and changes in the treatment approach for patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer. Although several drugs are available for treating these patients, there is still no consensus on their selection, and there has been limited direct or indirect comparison among them.ObjectiveTo address this gap, a network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of different drugs used in the treatment of HER2-positive gastric cancer.MethodsBy searching through databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, we identified 16 randomized controlled trials that involved a total of 4485 patients and utilized 9 different intervention measures.ResultsBased on the current evidence, compared with chemotherapy alone, the hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab were [hazard ratio (HR): 2.61 95%confidence interval (CI) (1.51, 4.51)] and [hazard ratio (HR): 2.01 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.18, 3.42)], respectively. Compared with chemotherapy alone, the hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in gastric cancer patients treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan were [hazard ratio (HR): 1.7 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.13, 2.56)] and [hazard ratio (HR): 2.13 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.42, 3.22)], respectively. It is suggested that nivolumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan can effectively prolong overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival(PFS) in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer, while also reducing the risk of adverse events to some extent. Therefore, these two regimens, nivolumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan, are considered to be effective and safe options for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer.ConclusionsIn previous studies, trastuzumab-based chemotherapy has been a common treatment for HER2-positive gastric cancer. To a certain extent, our study provides a reliable direction for future treatment options for HER2-positive gastric cancer.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42023420941.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with diabetes are known to be at greater risk for complications after arthroplasty than are patients without diabetes. However, we do not know whether there are important differences in the risk of perioperative complications between patients with diabetes who are insulin-dependent (Type 1 or 2) and those who are not insulin-dependent.Questions/purposesThe purpose of our study was to compare (1) medical complications (including death), (2) surgical complications, and (3) readmissions within 30 days between patients with insulin-dependent and noninsulin-dependent diabetes, and with patients who do not have diabetes.MethodsA total of 43,299 patients undergoing THA or TKA between 2005 and 2011 were selected from the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's (ACS-NSQIP®) database. Generalized linear models were used to assess the relationship between diabetes status and outcomes (no diabetes [n=36,574], insulin dependent [n=1552], and noninsulin dependent [n=5173]). Multivariate models were established adjusting for confounders including age, sex, race, BMI, smoking, steroid use, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anesthesia type. Post hoc comparisons between patient groups were made using a Bonferroni correction.ResultsPatients who were insulin dependent had increased odds of experiencing a medical complication (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0; p<0.001), as did patients who were noninsulin dependent (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4; p<0.001). An increased likelihood of 30-day mortality was found only for patients who were insulin dependent (OR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.6-8.5; p=0.007). However, neither diabetic state was associated with surgical complications. Finally, readmission was found to be independently associated with insulin-dependent diabetes (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; p=0.023).ConclusionsPatients with insulin-dependent diabetes are most likely to have a medical complication or be readmitted within 30 days after total joint replacement. However, patients who are insulin dependent or noninsulin dependent are no more likely than patients without diabetes to have a surgical complication. Physicians and hospitals should keep these issues in mind when counseling patients and generating risk-adjusted outcome reports.Level of evidenceLevel III, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Project description:ObjectiveTo do an indirect comparison analysis of apixaban against dabigatran etexilate (2 doses) and rivaroxaban (1 dose), as well as of rivaroxaban against dabigatranetexilate (2 doses), for their relative efficacy and safety against each other, with particular focus on the secondary prevention population for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. A secondary objective was to do the same analysis in the primary prevention cohort.DesignIndirect treatment comparisons of phase III clinical trials of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, with a focus on the secondary prevention cohorts. A secondary analysis was done on the primary prevention cohort.Data sourcesMedline and Central (up to June 2012), clinical trials registers, conference proceedings, and websites of regulatory agencies.Study selectionRandomised controlled trials of rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or apixaban compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.ResultsIn the secondary prevention (previous stroke) subgroup, when apixaban was compared with dabigatran (110 mg and 150 mg twice daily) for efficacy and safety endpoints, the only significant difference seen was less myocardial infarction (hazard ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.95) with apixaban compared with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily. No significant differences were seen in efficacy and most safety endpoints between apixaban or dabigatran 150 mg twice daily versus rivaroxaban. Less haemorrhagic stroke (hazard ratio 0.15, 0.03 to 0.66), vascular death (0.64, 0.42 to 0.99), major bleeding (0.68, 0.47 to 0.99), and intracranial bleeding (0.27, 0.10 to 0.73) were seen with dabigatran 110 mg twice daily versus rivaroxaban. In the primary prevention (no previous stroke) subgroup, apixaban was superior to dabigatran 110 mg twice daily for disabling or fatal stroke (hazard ratio 0.59, 0.36 to 0.97). Compared with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, apixaban was associated with more stroke (hazard ratio 1.45, 1.01 to 2.08) and with less major bleeding (0.75, 0.60 to 0.94), gastrointestinal bleeding (0.61, 0.42 to 0.89), and other location bleeding (0.74, 0.58 to 0.94). Compared with rivaroxaban, dabigatran 110 mg twice daily was associated with more myocardial infarction events. No significant differences were seen for the main efficacy and safety endpoints between dabigatran 150 mg twice daily and rivaroxaban, or in efficacy endpoints between apixaban and rivaroxaban. Apixaban was associated with less major bleeding (hazard ratio 0.61, 0.48 to 0.78) than rivaroxaban.ConclusionsFor secondary prevention, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran had broadly similar efficacy for the main endpoints, although the endpoints of haemorrhagic stroke, vascular death, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding were less common with dabigatran 110 mg twice daily than with rivaroxaban. For primary prevention, the three drugs showed some differences in relation to efficacy and bleeding. These results are hypothesis generating and should be confirmed in a head to head randomised trial.

Dataset Information

Effects of different anticoagulant drugs on the prevention of complications in patients after arthroplasty: A network meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Effects of different anticoagulant drugs on the prevention of complications in patients after arthroplasty: A network meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets