Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Tularemia vaccine: Safety, reactogenicity, "Take" skin reactions, and antibody responses following vaccination with a new lot of the Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain - A phase 2 randomized clinical Trial.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Tularemia is caused by Francisella tularensis, a gram-negative bacterium that has been weaponized as an aerosol. For protection of personnel conducting biodefense research, the United States Army required clinical evaluation of a new lot of tularemia live vaccine strain manufactured in accordance with Current Good Manufacturing Practices.

Methods

A phase 2 randomized clinical trial compared the new lot (DVC-LVS) to the existing vaccine that has been in use for decades (USAMRIID-LVS). The vaccines were delivered by scarification to 228 participants. Safety, reactogenicity, take and/or antibody levels were assessed on days 0, 1, 2, 8, 14, 28, 56, and 180.

Principal results

Both vaccines were safe and had acceptable reactogenicity profiles during six months of follow-up. There were no serious or grade 3 and 4 laboratory adverse events. Moderate systemic reactogenicity (mostly headache or feeling tired) was reported by ∼23% of participants receiving either vaccine. Injection site reactogenicity was mostly mild itchiness and pain. The frequencies of vaccine take skin reactions were 73% (95% CI, 64, 81) for DVC-LVS and 80% (95% CI, 71, 87) for USAMRIID-LVS. The 90% CI for the difference in proportions was -6.9% (-16.4, 2.6). The rates of seroconversion measured by microagglutination assay on days 28 or 56 were 94% (95% CI, 88, 98; n=98/104) for DVC-LVS and 94% (95% CI, 87, 97; n=103/110) for USAMRIID-LVS (p=1.00). Day 14 sera revealed more rapid seroconversion for DVC-LVS relative to USAMRIID-LVS: 82% (95% CI, 73, 89) versus 55% (95% CI, 45, 65), respectively (p<0.0001).

Major conclusions

The DVC-LVS vaccine had similar safety, reactogenicity, take and antibody responses compared to the older USAMRIID vaccine, and was superior for early (day 14) antibody production. Vaccination take was not a sensitive surrogate for seroconversion in a multi-center study where personnel at five research clinics performed assessments. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01150695.

SUBMITTER: Mulligan MJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5800773 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Tularemia vaccine: Safety, reactogenicity, "Take" skin reactions, and antibody responses following vaccination with a new lot of the Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain - A phase 2 randomized clinical Trial.

Mulligan Mark J MJ   Stapleton Jack T JT   Keitel Wendy A WA   Frey Sharon E SE   Chen Wilbur H WH   Rouphael Nadine N   Edupuganti Srilatha S   Beck Allison A   Winokur Patricia L PL   El Sahly Hana M HM   Patel Shital M SM   Atmar Robert L RL   Graham Irene I   Anderson Edwin E   El-Kamary Samer S SS   Pasetti Marcela F MF   Sztein Marcelo B MB   Hill Heather H   Goll Johannes B JB  

Vaccine 20170724 36


<h4>Background</h4>Tularemia is caused by Francisella tularensis, a gram-negative bacterium that has been weaponized as an aerosol. For protection of personnel conducting biodefense research, the United States Army required clinical evaluation of a new lot of tularemia live vaccine strain manufactured in accordance with Current Good Manufacturing Practices.<h4>Methods</h4>A phase 2 randomized clinical trial compared the new lot (DVC-LVS) to the existing vaccine that has been in use for decades (  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2020-06-30 | GSE149809 | GEO
| S-EPMC4285279 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3294612 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3827231 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7563297 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5204066 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8386241 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4207810 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2849404 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4462183 | biostudies-literature